J Korean Med Sci.  1998 Oct;13(5):533-540. 10.3346/jkms.1998.13.5.533.

Surgical options of hypertensive intracerebral hematoma: stereotactic endoscopic removal versus stereotactic catheter drainage

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. kimmyhy1@blue.nownuri.net

Abstract

The authors analyzed the difference between two surgical procedures, stereotactic endoscopic removal (SER) and stereotactic catheter drainage (SCD), in 18 patients of ganglionic intracerebral hematoma (ICH). Ten patients underwent SCD and eight SER within 24 hours of insult. The mean age was 53.3 (33-81) years and male to female ratio was 11:7. The mean volume of hematoma was 34.4 (23-105) ml. All patients had major neurological deficits without signs of transtentorial herniation. Mean follow-up was 8 (6-10) months. Under local anesthesia, Otzuki's cannula was placed through a burr hole. ICH was removed with suction and forceps under endoscopic guidance. Hemostasis was performed with Nd-YAG laser. For SCD, we used silicone catheter and urokinase. The hematoma was drained in 3-5 days in SER, whereas 7-10 days in SCD. Postoperative rebleeding occurred in one case of SER. Mortality rate was 13% in SER, 10% in SCD. The patients who gained most from these treatments were those who had been admitted with an impaired level of consciousness. The whole procedure can be done under direct vision in SER, so SER might replace SCD with similar mortality.


MeSH Terms

Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Catheterization
Comparative Study
Drainage/methods*
Endoscopy/methods*
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hematoma/surgery*
Hematoma/pathology
Human
Male
Middle Age
Prognosis
Stereotaxic Techniques*
Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr