Neurospine.  2025 Mar;22(1):40-47. 10.14245/ns.2448902.451.

Open Versus Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery in the Treatment of Single-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An AO Spine Global Cross-Sectional Study

Affiliations
  • 1Operative Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
  • 2Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
  • 3Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College, Karur, India
  • 4Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Engineering, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, Coimbatore, India
  • 5Department of Spine Surgery, Orthopaedic Research Group, Coimbatore, India
  • 6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
  • 7Department of Spine Surgery, Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences, New York, NY, USA
  • 8Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Clínico Regional de Concepción, Concepción, Chile
  • 9Faculty of Medicine, University of Concepción, Concepción, Chile
  • 10USC Spine Centre, Department of Neurological Surgery and Orthopaedics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
  • 11Edinburgh Spinal Surgery Outcomes Study Group, Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK
  • 12Spinal Surgery Division, Department of Traumatology, University Hospital Centre Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia
  • 13Department of Anatomy and Physiology, University of Applied Health Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia
  • 14Department of Orthopaedics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

Abstract


Objective
This study aims to assess global trends in the use of open surgery versus minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for the treatment of single-level L4–5 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS).
Methods
A cross-sectional online survey issued by the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Degenerative was conducted among AO Spine members between July and September 2023. Participants were presented with 3 clinical cases of L4–5 grade 1 DLS, each with varying degrees of stenosis and instability. The survey captured surgeon demographics and preferences for open versus MIS approaches. Statistical analysis, including chi-square tests and logistic regression, was performed to explore associations between surgical choices and surgeon demographics.
Results
A total of 943 surgeons responded, with 479 completing the survey. Open surgery was the preferred approach in all 3 cases (58.8%, 57.3%, and 42.4%, respectively), particularly in cases involving central and bilateral foraminal stenosis. MIS was the second most common choice, particularly for unilateral foraminal stenosis with mild instability (38.8%). Surgeons’ preferences varied significantly by region, age, and fellowship training, with younger and fellowship-trained surgeons more likely to prefer MIS.
Conclusion
The study highlights the continued predominance of open surgery for DLS, especially in complex cases, despite the growing acceptance of MIS. Significant regional and demographic variations in surgical preferences suggest the need for tailored guidelines and standardized training protocols to optimize patient outcomes. Future research should focus on the long-term efficacy of these approaches and the impact of evolving technologies on surgical decision-making.

Keyword

Spondylolisthesis; Open surgery; Minimally invasive spine surgery; Fusion; Indirect decompression; Survey
Full Text Links
  • NS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr