Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.  2025 Feb;29(1):88-94. 10.14701/ahbps.24-170.

Anesthesia management for total robotic liver transplantation: Inaugural case series in Europe

• Duarte A
• Katerenchuk V
• Poeira R
• Rocha P
• Pissarra F
• Canas M
• Dias S
• Andrade D
• Marques HP
• Cadilha S
• Pinto JS

• KMID: 2565412
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.24-170

Abstract

Robotic liver transplantation represents a cutting-edge technique that may surpass traditional open surgery. Nonetheless, it introduces unique anesthetic challenges, including extended pneumoperitoneum, restricted patient access, and a risk of undetected blood loss. This article describes an anesthetic approach and patient outcomes for the first four total robotic liver transplants performed at a tertiary university hospital in Portugal, along with inaugural procedures of their kind in Europe. We retrospectively analyzed surgical and anesthetic data from four patients who underwent total robotic liver transplantation from February to April 2024. Data encompassed clinical profile, preoperative assessment, surgical and anesthesia details, postoperative course, and outcomes. Patients’ age ranged from 51 to 69 years. Their cirrhosis was primarily due to alcohol use, hepatitis C virus infection, hepatocellular carcinoma, or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. General anesthesia was administered. Hemodynamic monitoring and goal-directed fluid therapy were conducted using a PiCCO system. Blood loss varied from 1,000 to 5,000 mL. Blood products were transfused as needed. All donor livers underwent hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion before transplantation. After surgery, two patients were immediately extubated, while two required extended ventilation. Hospital stays ranged from 10 to 40 days. The 30-day survival rate was 100%. This initial case series affirmed the feasibility and safety of total robotic liver transplantation for carefully selected patients, yielding favorable short-term results. Anesthetic management can rely on proactive strategies, acute situational awareness, and effective multidisciplinary collaboration.

Keyword

Liver transplantation; Minimally invasive surgical procedures; Robotic surgical procedures; Transplantation

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Complexities in anesthetic management during robotic liver transplantation: navigating limited access and space with precision monitoring.

• 

  Fig. 2 Surgical ports for robotic liver transplantation.

• 

  Fig. 3 Orchestrating anesthesia for robotic liver transplantation: A tri-phasic blueprint from preoperative planning to postoperative recovery. ICU, intensive care unit.

Reference

References

1. Ashrafian H, Clancy O, Grover V, Darzi A. 2017; The evolution of robotic surgery: surgical and anaesthetic aspects. Br J Anaesth. 119:i72–i84. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aex383. PMID: 29161400.

2. Finotti M, D'Amico F, Mulligan D, Testa G. 2023; A narrative review of the current and future role of robotic surgery in liver surgery and transplantation. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 12:56–68. DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-21-115. PMID: 36860258. PMCID: PMC9944521.

3. Wong DJ, Wong MJ, Choi GH, Wu YM, Lai PB, Goh BKP. 2019; Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open hepatectomy. ANZ J Surg. 89:165–170. DOI: 10.1111/ans.14690. PMID: 29943881.

4. Hackl F, Nazemian R, Saeed A, Cheah YL, Kaufman MD. 2023; Anesthesia and enhanced recovery for robotic living donor hepatectomy - A narrative review. J Liver Transplant. 10:100148. DOI: 10.1016/j.liver.2023.100148.

5. Martucci G, Burgio G, Spada M, Arcadipane AF. 2013; Anesthetic management of totally robotic right lobe living-donor hepatectomy: new tools ask for perioperative care. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 17:1974–1977.

6. Khan AS, Scherer M, Panni R, Cullinan D, Martens G, Kangarga I, et al. 2024; Total robotic liver transplant: the final frontier of minimally invasive surgery. Am J Transplant. 24:1467–1472. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.03.030. PMID: 38556089.

7. Pinto-Marques H, Sobra M, Magistri P, Gomes da Silva S, Guerrini GP, Mega R, et al. Full robotic whole graft liver transplantation: a step into the future. Ann Surg. 2024; https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000006420 [in press]. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006420. PMID: 38953528.

8. Horné F, Drefs M, Schirren MJ, Koch DT, Cepele G, Jacobi SJ, et al. 2022; Hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) prior to liver transplantation mitigates post-reperfusion syndrome and perioperative electrolyte shifts. J Clin Med. 11:7381. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11247381. PMID: 36555997. PMCID: PMC9786550.

9. Giulianotti PC, Bianco FM, Daskalaki D, Gonzalez-Ciccarelli LF, Kim J, Benedetti E. 2016; Robotic liver surgery: technical aspects and review of the literature. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 5:311–321. DOI: 10.21037/hbsn.2015.10.05. PMID: 27500143. PMCID: PMC4960413.

10. Chen PD, Wu CY, Hu RH, Ho CM, Lee PH, Lai HS, et al. 2016; Robotic liver donor right hepatectomy: a pure, minimally invasive approach. Liver Transpl. 22:1509–1518. DOI: 10.1002/lt.24522. PMID: 27509325.

11. Cherqui D, Ciria R, Kwon CHD, Kim KH, Broering D, Wakabayashi G, et al. 2021; Expert consensus guidelines on minimally invasive donor hepatectomy for living donor liver transplantation from innovation to implementation: a joint initiative from the International Laparoscopic Liver Society (ILLS) and the Asian-Pacific Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (A-PHPBA). Ann Surg. 273:96–108. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004475. PMID: 33332874.