Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.  2025 Feb;29(1):5-10. 10.14701/ahbps.24-192.

Robotic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Can they be compared? A narrative review and personal considerations disproving low-level evidence

• Tebala GD
• Bianchi PP
• Bond-Smith G
• Coratti A
• Panaro F
• Pernazza G
• Cavaliere D

• KMID: 2565401
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.24-192

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard for the treatment of symptomatic gallstones, acute cholecystitis, and acute gallstone pancreatitis. In recent years, the development and diffusion of robotic surgery have provided surgeons with the opportunity to apply this innovative approach to cholecystectomy, yielding interesting results. However, as with any new surgical technique, robotic cholecystectomy (RC) has met with skepticism within the surgical community. Beyond the understandable concerns regarding increased costs, some authors have claimed that RC is associated with a higher complication rate compared to LC. We reviewed the existing literature on this subject, discussing the limitations and strengths of the most significant publications and critically analyzing them. The analysis of the literature indicates that RC is safe and effective, with no definitive evidence of its inferiority compared to LC. Some of the published papers are of low quality and biased, even with significant sample sizes. Furthermore, we believe that comparing an established technique like LC with a new and not yet standardized one such as RC is somewhat illogical. RC represents a significant advance in minimally invasive surgery and should be viewed as an opportunity to familiarize oneself with the robotic device and to enhance the surgeon’s skills in preparation for more complex robotic operations. The robotic approach can be beneficial in selected cases of cholecystectomy where fine dissection is required. With further reductions in costs, RC could become the future gold standard for benign gallbladder disorders.

Keyword

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Robotics; Cholecystectomy

Reference

References

1. Kalata S, Thumma JR, Norton EC, Dimick JB, Sheetz KH. 2023; Comparative safety of robotic-assisted vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA Surg. 158:1303–1310. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.4389. PMID: 37728932. PMCID: PMC10512167.

2. Linkedin. c2023. Update from Michel Gagner [internet]. Linkedin;Available from: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7110400838497357824?updateEntityUrn=urn%3Ali%3Afs_feedUpdate%3A%28V2%2Curn%3Ali%3Aactivity%3A7110400838497357824%29. cited 2024 Jan 20.

3. Matsui Y, Hirooka S, Yamaki S, Kotsuka M, Kosaka H, Yamamoto T, et al. 2019; Assessment of clinical outcome of cholecystectomy according to age in preparation for the "Silver Tsunami". Am J Surg. 218:567–570. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.01.021. PMID: 30728100.

4. Veen EJ, Bik M, Janssen-Heijnen ML, De Jongh M, Roukema AJ. 2008; Outcome measurement in laparoscopic cholecystectomy by using a prospective complication registry: results of an audit. Int J Qual Health Care. 20:144–151. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm073. PMID: 18218669.

5. Cillara N, Podda M, Cicalò E, Sotgiu G, Provenzano M, Fransvea P, et al. DeDiLaCo Study Collaborative Group. 2023; A prospective cohort analysis of the prevalence and predictive factors of delayed discharge after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Italy: The DeDiLaCo Study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 33:463–473. DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001207. PMID: 37526464. PMCID: PMC10545073.

6. Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM). c2009. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine: Levels of Evidence (March 2009) [Internet]. CEBM;https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levels-of-evidence/ocebm-levels-of-evidence. cited 2024 Oct 12.

7. Sugrue M, Sahebally SM, Ansaloni L, Zielinski MD. 2015; Grading operative findings at laparoscopic cholecystectomy- a new scoring system. World J Emerg Surg. 10:14. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-015-0005-x. PMID: 25870652. PMCID: PMC4394404.

8. Campbell S, Lee SH, Liu Y, Wren SM. 2023; A retrospective study of laparoscopic, robotic-assisted, and open emergent/urgent cholecystectomy based on the PINC AI Healthcare Database 2017-2020. World J Emerg Surg. 18:55. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00521-8. PMID: 38037087. PMCID: PMC10687827.

9. Delgado LM, Pompeu BF, Pasqualotto E, Magalhães CM, Oliveira AFM, Kato BK, et al. 2024; Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg. 18:242. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01989-5. PMID: 38837047.

10. Aguayo E, Dobaria V, Nakhla M, Seo YJ, Hadaya J, Cho NY, et al. 2020; National trends and outcomes of inpatient robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery. 168:625–630. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.06.018. PMID: 32762874.

11. Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Giovannini I, Murazio M, D'Acapito F, Ardito F, et al. 2008; Advantages of multidisciplinary management of bile duct injuries occurring during cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 195:763–769. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.05.046. PMID: 18367147.

12. Fischer JE. 2009; Is damage to the common bile duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy an inherent risk of the operation? Am J Surg. 197:829–832. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.03.003. PMID: 19497408.

13. Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Giovannini I, Ardito F, D'Acapito F, Vellone M, et al. 2005; Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of an Italian national survey on 56 591 cholecystectomies. Arch Surg. 140:986–992. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.140.10.986. PMID: 16230550.

14. Gantschnigg A, Koch OO, Singhartinger F, Tschann P, Hitzl W, Emmanuel K, et al. 2023; Short-term outcomes and costs analysis of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy-a retrospective single-center analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 408:299. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03037-6. PMID: 37552295. PMCID: PMC10409838.

15. Rifai AO, Rembetski EM, Stutts LC, Mazurek ZD, Yeh JL, Rifai K, et al. 2023; Retrospective analysis of operative time and time to discharge for laparoscopic vs robotic approaches to appendectomy and cholecystectomy. J Robot Surg. 17:2187–2193. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01632-9. PMID: 37271758. PMCID: PMC10492745.

16. Kane WJ, Charles EJ, Mehaffey JH, Hawkins RB, Meneses KB, Tache-Leon CA, et al. 2020; Robotic compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a propensity matched analysis. Surgery. 167:432–435. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.07.020. PMID: 31492434. PMCID: PMC6980975.

17. Willuth E, Hardon SF, Lang F, Haney CM, Felinska EA, Kowalewski KF, et al. 2022; Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy is superior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the initial training for surgical novices in an ex vivo porcine model: a randomized crossover study. Surg Endosc. 36:1064–1079. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08373-6. PMID: 33638104. PMCID: PMC8758618.

18. Stefanova I, Alkhatib O, Sheel A, Alabraba E, Alibrahim M, Arshad A, et al. 2024; Safety of robotic cholecystectomy as index training procedure: the UK experience. Surg Endosc. 38:4880–4886. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11006-3. PMID: 38955837.

19. Breitenstein S, Nocito A, Puhan M, Held U, Weber M, Clavien PA. 2008; Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a case-matched control study. Ann Surg. 247:987–993. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318172501f. PMID: 18520226.

20. Litynski GS. 1998; Erich Mühe and the rejection of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (1985): a surgeon ahead of his time. Jsls. 2:341–346.