Korean Circ J.  2025 Jan;55(1):1-4. 10.4070/kcj.2024.0264.

Is Any ABCDE Stress Echocardiography Score Equivalent to Stress-Induced Ischaemia? Reply With a Modified 2-Stage Approach

• Miaris N

• KMID: 2564711
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2024.0264

Abstract

Stress echocardiography has evolved from the sole assessment of regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMAs) to the ABCDE protocol, as recommended by the recent clinical consensus statement from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, reflecting the need for a more systematic patient assessment. Steps A, B, C, D, and E assess RWMAs, lung B-lines, left ventricular contractile reserve, coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) in middistal left anterior descending artery, and heart rate reserve, respectively. Impairment of CFVR is considered as the earliest abnormality in the ischaemic cascade. While mostly steps A and D have been studied for their relation to obstructive and non-obstructive coronary artery disease, the diagnostic accuracy of steps B, C, and E for chronic coronary syndromes (CCSs) remains unknown, particularly in the context of negative steps A and D. Additionally, while ABCDE steps have been studied for their prognostic significance, there is no evidence of patients management based on this protocol in order to change the estimated risk. These concepts could be depicted in a 2-stage approach. A negative stage 1 (no stress-induced RWMAs as assessed in step A and normal CFVR as assessed in step D) imply good prognosis and noncoronary causes of symptoms should be considered, whereas guidelines for CCSs should be followed in a positive stage 1. Stage 2 includes steps B, C, and E, for further risk stratification or symptoms assessment, but it lacks evidence-based risk-modifying management and is mainly useful when stage 1 is negative and a cardiac origin of symptoms is still suspected.

Keyword

Stress echocardiography; Coronary artery disease; Myocardial ischemia

Figure

• 

  Figure 1 A modified 2-stage application of the ABCDE stress echocardiography markers. Stress-induced ischaemia is defined as a positive stage 1 with relevant guidelines-based management. Stage 2 provides mainly further risk stratification and symptoms assessment, not necessarily related to CCSs. Positive steps A, B, C, D, and E, as described by Ciampi et al.3) CAD = coronary artery disease; CCS = chronic coronary syndrome; CFVR = coronary flow velocity reserve; EGC = electrocardiography; ESV = end-systolic volume; HRR = heart rate reserve; LAD = left anterior descending artery; LVCR = left ventricular contractile reserve; RWMA = regional wall motion abnormality; SBP = systolic blood pressure; WMSI = wall motion score index.

Reference

1. Picano E, Pierard L, Peteiro J, et al. The clinical use of stress echocardiography in chronic coronary syndromes and beyond coronary artery disease: a clinical consensus statement from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging of the ESC. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024; 25:e65–e90. PMID: 37798126.

2. Takeuchi M, Lodato JA, Furlong KT, Lang RM, Yoshikawa J. Feasibility of measuring coronary flow velocity and reserve in the left anterior descending coronary artery by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography in a relatively obese American population. Echocardiography. 2005; 22:225–232. PMID: 15725157.

3. Ciampi Q, Zagatina A, Cortigiani L, et al. Prognostic value of stress echocardiography assessed by the ABCDE protocol. Eur Heart J. 2021; 42:3869–3878. PMID: 34449837.

4. Ciampi Q, Zagatina A, Cortigiani L, et al. Functional, anatomical, and prognostic correlates of coronary flow velocity reserve during stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 74:2278–2291. PMID: 31672185.

5. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020; 41:407–477. PMID: 31504439.

6. Pellikka PA, Arruda-Olson A, Chaudhry FA, et al. Guidelines for performance, interpretation, and application of stress echocardiography in ischemic heart disease: from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020; 33:1–41.e8. PMID: 31740370.

7. Gaibazzi N, Ciampi Q, Cortigiani L, et al. Multiple phenotypes of chronic coronary syndromes identified by ABCDE stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2024; 37:477–485. PMID: 38092306.

8. Miaris N, Kasinos N, Zachos P, Destounis A, Theodosis-Georgilas A. Insights from the ABCDE phenotypes of chronic coronary syndromes. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2024; 37:652.

9. Writing Committee Members. Gulati M, Levy PD, et al. 2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021; 78:e187–e285. PMID: 34756653.