Intest Res.  2025 Jan;23(1):56-64. 10.5217/ir.2024.00009.

The prevalence of pouch fistulas in ulcerative colitis following restorative proctocolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology, Northern Hospital, Epping, Australia
  • 2Department of Gastroenterology, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
  • 3Department of Gastroenterology, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
  • 4Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
  • 5Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia
  • 6Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

Abstract

Background/Aims
One complication of restorative proctocolectomy with ileo-anal pouch anastomosis is fistula formation in the pouch. Fistulas can be associated with significant morbidity and pouch failure. We conducted a systematic review with meta- analysis to try and understand the prevalence of pouch fistulas in patients with ulcerative colitis following restorative proctocolectomy.
Methods
The Embase, Embase Classic, and PubMed databases were searched between January 1979 and April 2022. Studies were included if there were cross-sectional, case-controlled, population-based or cohort studies reporting on prevalence of pouch fistulas in ulcerative colitis. Studies had to report the number of patients with pouch fistulas using either clinical, endoscopic, or radiological diagnosis in an adult population.
Results
Thirty-three studies screened met the inclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence of developing at least 1 fistula was 0.05 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04–0.07). The pooled prevalence of pouch failure in patients with pouch fistula was found to be 0.24 (95% CI, 0.19–0.30). The pooled prevalence of developing a pouch fistula at 3 years, 5 years and more than 5 years was 0.04 (95% CI, 0.02–0.07), 0.05 (95% CI, 0.02–0.07), and 0.05 (95% CI, 0.02–0.10), respectively.
Conclusions
This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to report the prevalence of pouch fistula. It also provides a pooled prevalence of pouch failure in these patients. These results can help to shape future guidelines, power future studies, and help counsel patients.

Keyword

Ulcerative colitis; Fistula; Restorative proctocolectomy; Pouch

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) diagram.

  • Fig. 2. Forest plot of studies reporting the prevalence of at least 1 fistula in patients with a pouch.

  • Fig. 3. Forest plot of studies reporting the prevalence of pouch-vaginal fistulas in patients with a pouch.

  • Fig. 4. Forest plot of studies reporting the prevalence of anal-pouch fistulas in patients with a pouch.

  • Fig. 5. Forest plot of studies reporting the prevalence of pouch failure in patients with a pouch fistula.


Reference

1. Sofo L, Caprino P, Sacchetti F, Bossola M. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: a narrative review. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016; 8:556–563.
2. Freeha K, Bo S. Complications related to J-pouch surgery. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2018; 14:571–576.
3. Wei Y, Gong JF, Zhu WM. Endoscopic closure instead of surgery to close an ileal pouch fistula with the over-the-scope clip system. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2017; 9:95–98.
4. Wasmuth HH, Tranø G, Wibe A, Endreseth BH, Rydning A, Myrvold HE. Failed pelvic pouch substituted by continent ileostomy. Colorectal Dis. 2010; 12(7 Online):e109–e113.
5. Allen N, Garforth E, Heath R, Rooney P. PTU-120 A review of patients in a single centre with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and an assessment of those patients who require on going medical therapy. Gut. 2012; 61(Suppl 2):A234.
6. Arai K, Koganei K, Kimura H, et al. Incidence and outcome of complications following restorative proctocolectomy. Am J Surg. 2005; 190:39–42.
7. Carcamo L, Miranda P, Zúñiga A, et al. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis: outcomes, functional results, and quality of life in patients with more than 10-year follow-up. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020; 35:747–753.
8. Cho W, Cho YB, Kim JY, et al. Outcome of total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. J Korean Surg Soc. 2012; 83:135–140.
9. Davies M, Hawley PR. Ten years experience of one-stage restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007; 22:1255–1260.
10. Dayton MT, Larsen KR, Christiansen DD. Similar functional results and complications after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with indeterminate vs ulcerative colitis. Arch Surg. 2002; 137:690–695.
11. ElHak NG, ElGeidie AA, El Hemaly M, Monier A. P179 Outcome of pouch surgery for ulcerative colitis in 124 Egyptian patients. J Crohns Colitis. 2014; 8(Supplement_1):S137.
12. Hahnloser D, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG, Larson DR, Crownhart BS, Dozois RR. Results at up to 20 years after ileal pouchanal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg. 2007; 94:333–340.
13. Heimann TM, Swaminathan S, Slater GI, Kurtz RJ. Perianal fistula after ileoanal pouch in patients with ulcerative colitis: a review of 475 patients operated on at a major IBD center. Dis Colon Rectum. 2022; 65:76–82.
14. Helavirta I, Lehto K, Huhtala H, Hyöty M, Collin P, Aitola P. Pouch failures following restorative proctocolectomy in ulcerative colitis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020; 35:2027–2033.
15. Ho KS, Chang CC, Baig MK, et al. Ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis is feasible for septuagenarians. Colorectal Dis. 2006; 8:235–238.
16. Ide S, Araki T, Okita Y, et al. Outcome and functional prognosis of pelvic sepsis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis. Surg Today. 2017; 47:301–306.
17. Ikeuchi H, Uchino M, Matsuoka H, et al. Surgery for ulcerative colitis in 1,000 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010; 25:959–965.
18. Johnson E, Carlsen E, Nazir M, Nygaard K. Morbidity and functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. Eur J Surg. 2001; 167:40–45.
19. Kjaer MD, Kjeldsen J, Qvist N. Poor outcomes of complicated pouch-related fistulas after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery. Scand J Surg. 2016; 105:163–167.
20. Körsgen S, Keighley MR. Causes of failure and life expectancy of the ileoanal pouch. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1997; 12:4–8.
21. Krausz MM, Duek SD. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: twenty years follow-up in 174 patients. Isr Med Assoc J. 2005; 7:23–27.
22. Kuwabara H, Kimura H, Kunisaki R, et al. Postoperative complications, bowel function, and prognosis in restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a single-center observational study of 320 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022; 37:563–572.
23. Lavryk OA, Stocchi L, Hull TL, et al. Impact of preoperative duration of ulcerative colitis on long-term outcomes of restorative proctocolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020; 35:41–49.
24. Lepistö A, Luukkonen P, Järvinen HJ. Cumulative failure rate of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and quality of life after failure. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002; 45:1289–1294.
25. Lightner AL, Mathis KL, Dozois EJ, et al. Results at up to 30 years after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017; 23:781–790.
26. Lim MH, Lord AR, Simms LA, et al. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: an Australian institution’s experience. Ann Coloproctol. 2021; 37:318–325.
27. Lorenzo G, Maurizio C, Maria LP, et al. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis 20 years later: is it still a good surgical option for patients with ulcerative colitis? Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016; 31:1835–1843.
28. Macaluso FS, Rossi F, Orlando A, et al. P372 The long term course of patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis. 2017; (suppl_1):11:S267.
29. Mennigen R, Senninger N, Bruewer M, Rijcken E. Pouch function and quality of life after successful management of pouchrelated septic complications in patients with ulcerative colitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012; 397:37–44.
30. Parra RS, Feitosa MS, Pereira FC, Rodrigues RS, Féres O, Ribeiro da Rocha JJ. P300 Long-term surgical outcomes following restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis in a tertiary IBD centre in Brazil. J Crohns Colitis. 2019; 13(Suppl_1):S249–S250.
31. Ryoo SB, Oh HK, Han EC, et al. Complications after ileal pouchanal anastomosis in Korean patients with ulcerative colitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20:7488–7496.
32. Shimada N, Ohge H, Watadani Y, et al. Undesired permanent ileostomy after ileal-pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis, which was associated with pouch fistula. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020; 63:e349–e350.
33. Tan KK, Ravindran P, Young CJ, Solomon MJ. The extent of inflammation is a predictor for pouch-related complications in ileal pouches in patients with ulcerative or indeterminate colitis. Colorectal Dis. 2014; 16:620–625.
34. Teixeira MG, Ponte AC, Sousa M, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 2003; 58:193–198.
35. Tulchinsky H, Dotan I, Alper A, et al. Comprehensive pouch clinic concept for follow-up of patients after ileal pouch anal anastomosis: report of 3 years’ experience in a tertiary referral center. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008; 14:1125–1132.
36. Villamil I, Abreu Y, Suleiman W, et al. Outcomes of patients with ulcerative colitis and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis at the University of Puerto Rico Center for inflammatory bowel diseases. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011; 106:S474.
37. Zárate CA, Zúñiga DA, Pinedo MG, López KF, Molina PME, Viviani GP. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: complications and long term functional results. Rev Med Chil. 2008; 136:467–474.
38. Zittan E, Ma GW, Wong-Chong N, et al. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: a Canadian institution’s experience. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017; 32:281–285.
39. Pellino G, Celentano V, Vinci D, et al. Ileoanal pouch-related fistulae: a systematic review with meta-analysis on incidence, treatment options and outcomes. Dig Liver Dis. 2023; 55:342–349.
40. Ng KS, Gonsalves SJ, Sagar PM. Ileal-anal pouches: a review of its history, indications, and complications. World J Gastroenterol. 2019; 25:4320–4342.
41. Yadav A, Foromera J, Falchuk KR, Feuerstein JD. Biologics and immunomodulators for treating Crohn’s disease developing after surgery for an initial diagnosis of ulcerative colitis: a review of current literature. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018; 53:813–817.
Full Text Links
  • IR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr