Ann Surg Treat Res.  2025 Feb;108(2):79-85. 10.4174/astr.2025.108.2.79.

Can proximal gastrectomy be an alternative to total gastrectomy due to its nutritional advantage? A retrospective cohort study

• Aydoğan O
• Coşkun M
• Şekerci UU
• Cartı EB

• KMID: 2564246
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2025.108.2.79

Abstract

Purpose
This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of proximal gastrectomy (PG) compared to total gastrectomy (TG) in patients with proximal stomach cancer, focusing on nutritional advantages and overall survival.
Methods
A retrospective review was conducted on 87 patients who underwent gastrectomy for stomach cancer at Adnan Menderes University from January 2016 to January 2023. Among them, 21 patients underwent PG and 32 patients underwent TG. Clinical parameters, nutritional status, postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms, and survival rates were compared between the 2 groups. Statistical analyses included the chi-square test, Student t-test, and Mann-Whitney U-test.
Results
The PG group showed significantly less weight loss at 12 months (6.9 ± 5.2 kg vs. 17.9 ± 4.0 kg, P < 0.001) and higher albumin levels at both 6 and 12 months, postoperatively (P < 0.001). The reflux index was higher in the PG group (9.4 ± 2.4 vs. 5.2 ± 1.6, P < 0.001), but there was no significant difference in overall Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale scores (P = 0.266). Disease-specific and overall survival were significantly better in the PG group (P = 0.004 and P = 0.003, respectively).
Conclusion
PG offers significant nutritional advantages and improved survival outcomes compared to TG despite higher rates of reflux. These findings suggest that PG can be a viable, function-preserving alternative to TG for patients with proximal stomach cancer. Further large-scale, prospective studies are needed to confirm these results and ensure oncological safety.

Keyword

Nutritional status; Gastrectomy; Weight loss

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 The Kaplan-Meier curves of patients undergoing proximal gastrectomy (PG) and total gastrectomy (TG). (A) The relationship between operation type and disease-free survival (log-rank test, P = 0.027). (B) The relationship between operation type and disease-specific survival (log-rank test, P = 0.050). (C) The relationship between operation type and the log-rank test overall survival (P = 0.013).

Reference

1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015; 136:E359–E386. PMID: 25220842.

2. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015; 65:87–108. PMID: 25651787.

3. Deans C, Yeo MS, Soe MY, Shabbir A, Ti TK, So JB. Cancer of the gastric cardia is rising in incidence in an Asian population and is associated with adverse outcome. World J Surg. 2011; 35:617–624. PMID: 21203759.

4. Carr JS, Zafar SF, Saba N, Khuri FR, El-Rayes BF. Risk factors for rising incidence of esophageal and gastric cardia adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2013; 44:143–151. PMID: 23435833.

5. Steevens J, Botterweck AA, Dirx MJ, van den Brandt PA, Schouten LJ. Trends in incidence of oesophageal and stomach cancer subtypes in Europe. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010; 22:669–678. PMID: 19474750.

6. Bolton JS, Conway WC 2nd. Postgastrectomy syndromes. Surg Clin North Am. 2011; 91:1105–1122. PMID: 21889032.

7. Carvajal SH, Mulvihill SJ. Postgastrectomy syndromes: dumping and diarrhea. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1994; 23:261–279. PMID: 8070912.

8. An JY, Youn HG, Choi MG, Noh JH, Sohn TS, Kim S. The difficult choice between total and proximal gastrectomy in proximal early gastric cancer. Am J Surg. 2008; 196:587–591. PMID: 18519129.

9. Ronellenfitsch U, Najmeh S, Andalib A, Perera RM, Rousseau MC, Mulder DS, et al. Functional outcomes and quality of life after proximal gastrectomy with esophagogastrostomy using a narrow gastric conduit. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015; 22:772–779. PMID: 25212836.

10. Hu Y, Kim HI, Hyung WJ, Song KJ, Lee JH, Kim YM, et al. Vitamin B(12) deficiency after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an analysis of clinical patterns and risk factors. Ann Surg. 2013; 258:970–975. PMID: 24096753.

11. Takiguchi N, Takahashi M, Ikeda M, Inagawa S, Ueda S, Nobuoka T, et al. Long-term quality-of-life comparison of total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy by postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale (PGSAS-45): a nationwide multi-institutional study. Gastric Cancer. 2015; 18:407–416. PMID: 24801198.

12. Hsu CP, Chen CY, Hsieh YH, Hsia JY, Shai SE, Kao CH. Esophageal reflux after total or proximal gastrectomy in patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997; 92:1347–1350. PMID: 9260804.

13. Zelnick R, Auguste LJ, Wise L. Nutritional effects of postgastrectomy reconstruction: a clinical evaluation. J Surg Oncol. 1989; 40:219–221. PMID: 2927133.

14. Kiyama T, Mizutani T, Okuda T, Fujita I, Tokunaga A, Tajiri T, et al. Postoperative changes in body composition after gastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005; 9:313–319. PMID: 15749590.

15. Svedlund J, Sjodin I, Dotevall G. GSRS: a clinical rating scale for gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and peptic ulcer disease. Dig Dis Sci. 1988; 33:129–134. PMID: 3123181.

16. Yoo CH, Sohn BH, Han WK, Pae WK. Long-term results of proximal and total gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the upper third of the stomach. Cancer Res Treat. 2004; 36:50–55. PMID: 20396565.

17. Harrison LE, Karpeh MS, Brennan MF. Total gastrectomy is not necessary for proximal gastric cancer. Surgery. 1998; 123:127–130. PMID: 9481396.

18. Kondoh Y, Okamoto Y, Morita M, Nabeshima K, Nakamura K, Soeda J, et al. Clinical outcome of proximal gastrectomy in patients with early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Tokai J Exp Clin Med. 2007; 32:48–53. PMID: 21319057.

19. Zhou Y, Pan J, Sheng Y, Liu H, Fan Z. Surgical treatment effects in cancer of the cardia and esophagogastric junction. Chin Ger J Clin Oncol. 2007; 6:P220–P221.

20. Kim JH, Park SS, Kim J, Boo YJ, Kim SJ, Mok YJ, et al. Surgical outcomes for gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. World J Surg. 2006; 30:1870–1878. PMID: 16957826.

21. Shiraishi N, Adachi Y, Kitano S, Kakisako K, Inomata M, Yasuda K. Clinical outcome of proximal versus total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer. World J Surg. 2002; 26:1150–1154. PMID: 12209245.

22. Kwag SJ, Jung SH, Lee YJ, Jung CY, Park ST, Choi SK, et al. The risk factors of reflux complication after gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer. J Korean Surg Soc. 2010; 79:246–252.

23. Watanabe M, Iwatsuki M, Iwagami S, Ishimoto T, Baba Y, Baba H. Prognostic nutritional index predicts outcomes of gastrectomy in the elderly. World J Surg. 2012; 36:1632–1639. PMID: 22407085.

24. Ryan AM, Healy LA, Power DG, Rowley SP, Reynolds JV. Short-term nutritional implications of total gastrectomy for malignancy, and the impact of parenteral nutritional support. Clin Nutr. 2007; 26:718–727. PMID: 17949863.

25. Kalmár K, Németh J, Kelemen D, Agoston E, Horváth OP. Postprandial gastrointestinal hormone production is different, depending on the type of reconstruction fol lowing total gastrectomy. Ann Surg. 2006; 243:465–471. PMID: 16552196.

26. Kosuga T, Ichikawa D, Komatsu S, Okamoto K, Konishi H, Shiozaki A, et al. Feasibility and nutritional benefits of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in the upper stomach. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015; 22(Suppl 3):S929–S935. PMID: 25986867.