J Korean Med Sci.  2025 Jan;40(2):e6. 10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e6.

Impact of Government Healthcare Policy Changes on Consumption and Human Movements During COVID-19: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis in Korea

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Preventive Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
  • 2Artificial Intelligence and Big-Data Convergence Center, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea

Abstract

Background
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has altered daily behavioral patterns based on government healthcare policies, including consumption and movement patterns. We aimed to examine the extent to which changes in the government's healthcare policy have affected people's lives, primarily focusing on changes in consumption and population movements.
Methods
We collected consumption data using weekly credit card transaction data from the Hana Card Corporation and population mobility data using mobile phone data from SK Telecom in Seoul, South Korea. Interrupted time-series analysis was used to calculate the relative risk ratio and perform the intervention effects when government healthcare policy changes.
Results
We found that leisure and outside movements were the most immediately affected by changes in government healthcare policies. It took over 2 years and 11 months, respectively, for these sectors to return to their pre-COVID-19 routines.
Conclusion
Enhancing healthcare policies presents advantages and disadvantages. Although such policies help prevent the spread of COVID-19, they also reduce consumption and mobility, extending the time needed to return to pre-COVID-19 levels. Government healthcare policymakers should consider not only disease prevention but also the impact of these policies on social behaviors, economic activity, and mobility.

Keyword

COVID-19; Economics; Health Policy; Interrupted Time Series Analysis; Social Mobility; Outside Movements; Korea

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Timeline of healthcare policy changes in South Korea.COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019.

  • Fig. 2 High intervention effects of consumption on the sixth healthcare policy (2020–2023) in South Korea. (A) Leisure. (B) Shopping. (C) Health. (D) Food. (E) Trips. (F) Education.The red dotted line indicates the starting point of the sixth healthcare policy to prevent COVID-19. The blue line represented the interrupted time series before and after the red dotted line.

  • Fig. 3 High intervention effects of human mobility on the fifth healthcare policy (2019–2023) in South Korea. (A) Inside movement. (B) Outside movement.The red dotted line indicates the starting point of the fifth healthcare policy to prevent COVID-19. The blue line represented the interrupted time series before and after the red dotted line.


Reference

1. Yan B, Zhang X, Wu L, Zhu H, Chen B. Why do countries respond differently to COVID-19? A comparative study of Sweden, China, France, and Japan. Am Rev Public Adm. 2020; 50(6-7):762–769.
2. Jang WM, Jang DH, Lee JY. Social distancing and transmission-reducing practices during the 2019 coronavirus disease and 2015 Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus outbreaks in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2020; 35(23):e220. PMID: 32537955.
3. Ferguson NM, Laydon D, Nedjati Gilani G, Imai N, Ainslie K, Baguelin M, et al. Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID-19 mortality and healthcare demand. Updated 2020. Accessed February, 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/77482 .
4. Park IN, Yum HK. Stepwise strategy of social distancing in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2020; 35(28):e264. PMID: 32686376.
5. Liu K. COVID-19 and the Chinese economy: impacts, policy responses and implications. Int Rev Appl Econ. 2021; 35(2):308–330.
6. D’Ambrosio C, Rohde N. The distribution of economic insecurity: Italy and the U.S. over the great recession. Rev Income Wealth. 2014; 60(S1):S33–S52.
7. Cohen MJ. Does the COVID-19 outbreak mark the onset of a sustainable consumption transition? Sustain: Sci, Pract, Policy. 2020; 16(1):1–3.
8. Gordon-Wilson S. Consumption practices during the COVID-19 crisis. Int J Consum Stud. 2022; 46(2):575–588. PMID: 34220342.
9. Mertzanis C, Papastathopoulos A, Koutra C, Marashdeh H. COVID-19, mobility, leisure, and travel around the world. J Leis Res. 2023; 54(2):227–249.
10. Hall MC, Prayag G, Fieger P, Dyason D. Beyond panic buying: consumption displacement and COVID-19. J Serv Manag. 2021; 32(1):113–128.
11. Hu T, Wang S, She B, Zhang M, Huang X, Cui Y, et al. Human mobility data in the COVID-19 pandemic: characteristics, applications, and challenges. Int J Digit Earth. 2021; 14(9):1126–1147.
12. Meloni S, Perra N, Arenas A, Gómez S, Moreno Y, Vespignani A. Modeling human mobility responses to the large-scale spreading of infectious diseases. Sci Rep. 2011; 1(1):62. PMID: 22355581.
13. Watts A, Au NH, Thomas-Bachli A, Forsyth J, Mayah O, Popescu S, et al. Potential for inter-state spread of COVID-19 from Arizona, USA: analysis of mobile device location and commercial flight data. J Travel Med. 2020; 27(8):taaa136. PMID: 32822473.
14. Kraemer MUG, Yang CH, Gutierrez B, Wu CH, Klein B, Pigott DM, et al. The effect of human mobility and control measures on the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Science. 2020; 368(6490):493–497. PMID: 32213647.
15. Pepe E, Bajardi P, Gauvin L, Privitera F, Lake B, Cattuto C, et al. COVID-19 outbreak response, a dataset to assess mobility changes in Italy following national lockdown. Sci Data. 2020; 7(1):230. PMID: 32641758.
16. Abouk R, Heydari B. The immediate effect of COVID-19 policies on social-distancing behavior in the United States. Public Health Rep. 2021; 136(2):245–252. PMID: 33400622.
17. De Oliveira Neto L, Elsangedy HM, de Oliveira Tavares VD, Teixeira CV, Behm DG, Da Silva-Grigoletto ME. Training in home-training at home during the COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic: physical exercise and behavior-based approach. Braz J Exerc Physiol. 2020; 19(2):9–19.
18. Sheiner L, Yilla K. The ABCs of the post-COVID economic recovery. Updated 2020. Accessed July, 2024. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-abcs-of-the-post-covid-economic-recovery/ .
19. Park C, Park J. COVID-19 and the Korean economy: when, how, and what changes? Asian Soc Innov Policy. 2020; 9(2):187–206.
20. Rozario NL, Moore CG, McWilliams A. Interrupted time series power calculation using DO Loop simulations. Accessed February, 2024. http://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings17/1339-2017.pdf .
21. Abbas J, Mubeen R, Iorember PT, Raza S, Mamirkulova G. Exploring the impact of COVID-19 on tourism: transformational potential and implications for a sustainable recovery of the travel and leisure industry. Curr Res Behav Sci. 2021; 2:100033. PMID: 38620720.
22. Lee CC, Chen MP. Ecological footprint, tourism development, and country risk: International evidence. J Clean Prod. 2021; 279:123671.
23. Siksna I, Uturyte L, Karu K, Vanhalst J. The COVID-19 Pandemic and Food Consumption Patterns. Copenhagen, Denmark: Nordic Council of Ministers;2021. p. 1–28.
24. Ben Hassen T, El Bilali H, Allahyari MS. Impact of COVID-19 on food behavior and consumption in Qatar. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2020; 12(17):1–18.
25. Bartsch SM, Ferguson MC, McKinnell JA, O’Shea KJ, Wedlock PT, Siegmund SS, et al. The potential health care costs and resource use associated with COVID-19 in the United States. Health Aff (Millwood). 2020; 39(6):927–935. PMID: 32324428.
26. Choi YJ, Sohn J, Kim TH. Changes in expenditures of the National Health Insurance of Korea during the COVID-19 pandemic and the financial implications thereof. Yonsei Med J. 2023; 64(1):71–75. PMID: 36579382.
27. Jang SY, Seon JY, Yoon SJ, Park SY, Lee SH, Oh IH. Comorbidities and factors determining medical expenses and length of stay for admitted COVID-19 patients in Korea. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021; 14:2021–2033. PMID: 34040465.
28. Daniel SJ. Education and the COVID-19 pandemic. Prospects. 2020; 49(1-2):91–96. PMID: 32313309.
29. KOSIS. Shadow education participation rate by school level (Korean, author’s translation). Accessed February, 2024. https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1PE301&vw_cd=MT_ZTITLE&list_id=O153&seqNo=&lang_mode=ko&language=kor&obj_var_id=&itm_id=&conn_path=MT_ZTITLE .
30. OECD. Private spending on education. Accessed February, 2024. https://data.oecd.org/eduresource/private-spending-on-education.htm .
31. Chakraborty I, Maity P. COVID-19 outbreak: migration, effects on society, global environment and prevention. Sci Total Environ. 2020; 728:138882. PMID: 32335410.
32. Ryu S, Ali ST, Jang C, Kim B, Cowling BJ. Effect of nonpharmaceutical interventions on transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, South Korea, 2020. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020; 26(10):2406–2410. PMID: 32487283.
33. Park YJ, Choe YJ, Park O, Park SY, Kim YM, Kim J, et al. Contact tracing during coronavirus disease outbreak, South Korea, 2020. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020; 26(10):2465–2468. PMID: 32673193.
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr