Korean J Dermatol.
2024 Dec;62(10):541-549.
Hazards of Tattoo Procedures Performed by Non-Medical Personnel:
1st Policy Forum of the Korean Dermatological Research Foundation
- Affiliations
-
- 1Department of Dermatology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea
- 2Cleanup Dermatology Clinic, Daegu, Korea
- 3Department of Dermatology, Myongji Hospital, Goyang, Korea
- 4Department of Dermatology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- 5Doctors Dermatology Clinic, Seoul, Korea
- 6Yonsei Star Skin & Laser Clinic, Seoul, Korea
- 7Korean Dermatological Association, Seoul, Korea
- 8Department of Dermatology, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Korea
- 9Department of Dermatology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- 10Department of Dermatology, Eunpyeong St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
Abstract
- Tattooing is an invasive procedure that involves the introduction of permanent pigments into the dermis, and is categorized as a medical procedure in Korea. Despite the medical, cosmetic, and aesthetic purposes of tattooing, legislative proposals to allow non-medical personnel to perform tattooing have consistently been rejected on public health grounds, prioritizing health and safety considerations. Professional organizations have maintained a consistent position, highlighting the risks of allowing non-medical individuals to perform tattooing. These risks include procedural complications, use of unsafe practices, and inadequate legal frameworks to ensure accountability.
Addressing such issues requires careful consideration beyond economic or convenience factors, with an emphasis on public health policies. To address these concerns, the Korean Dermatological Research Foundation convened its 1st Policy Forum on October 6, 2024. The forum discussed the safety aspects, medical complications, and legal implications of tattooing performed by non-medical personnel. These findings highlight the significant risks and regulatory gaps associated with such practices, underscoring the need for a comprehensive review and stringent regulations to protect public health.