J Yeungnam Med Sci.  2025;42(1):18. 10.12701/jyms.2025.42.18.

Complete or incomplete revascularization in patients with left main culprit lesion acute myocardial infarction with multivessel disease: a retrospective observational study

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea
  • 2Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, St.Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea
  • 3Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Seoul, Korea
  • 4Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea
  • 5Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
  • 6Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea
  • 7Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
  • 8Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan Universtiy College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 9Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
  • 10Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea
  • 11Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, Korea
  • 12Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
  • 13Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wonkwang University Hospital, Iksan, Korea
  • 14Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea

Abstract

Background
Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better.
Methods
We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year.
Results
After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different.
Conclusion
There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Keyword

Acute myocardial infarction; Complete revascularization; Left main; Multivessel disease
Full Text Links
  • JYMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr