Int J Arrhythm.  2024 Dec;25(4):20. 10.1186/s42444-024-00126-5.

A single‑center outcome of choosing catheter ablation as the initial treatment in tachycardia–bradycardia syndrome and a new predictive factor for pacemaker implantation

• Kim H
• Kim J
• Kim J
• Park S
• Park K
• On Y

• KMID: 2563879
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.1186/s42444-024-00126-5

Abstract

Background
The relationship between sinus node dysfunction and atrial fibrillation (AF) has been well known. The reversibility of sinus node dysfunction is indeed a critical factor in determining the treatment strategy in patients with tachycardia–bradycardia syndrome (TBS). We aimed to assess the clinical outcome of choosing catheter abla‑ tion as the initial treatment in tachycardia–bradycardia syndrome and predictive factors leading to the implantation of a permanent pacemaker (PPM) in these patients.
Methods
Patients with TBS who had been taken AF catheter ablation from 2012 to 2021 were reviewed, and 113 patients were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether a “sinus pause episode of more than 3 s unrelated to tachyarrhythmia” coexists (Group I, n = 20) or not (Group II, n = 93).
Results
Compared to Group II, baseline characteristics showed that Group I was comprised of more female gender (p = 0.043), with hypertension (p = 0.033), and with enlarged left atrium (p = 0.003). An average three-year follow-up found that eight patients (8/113, 7%) were implanted PPM (5/20, 25% in Group I vs. 3/93, 3.2% in Group II, p = 0.001). Using a multivariate model, a “sinus pause episode unrelated to tachyarrhythmia” was strongly associated with PPM implantation after catheter ablation in patients with TBS (HR 6.765, 95% CI 1.355–33.763, p = 0.020). Only four out of 113 patients (3.5%) progressed to persistent or permanent AF.
Conclusions
After catheter ablation as the initial treatment in TBS, only 7% underwent PPM implantation, and an iso‑ lated sinus pause was a predictive factor for requiring PPM implantation. In addition, even in patients who undergo catheter ablation with subsequent PPM implantation, we can expect to improve the clinical outcome associated with a reduced AF burden.

Keyword

Atrial fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Tachycardia–bradycardia syndrome; Sinus node dysfunction; Pacemaker