Clin Should Elbow.  2024 Dec;27(4):464-478. 10.5397/cise.2024.00304.

Outcomes of lateralized reverse total shoulder arthroplasty versus latissimus dorsi transfer for external rotation deficit: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
  • 2Cooper Medical School, Rowan University, Camden, NJ, USA
  • 3College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
  • 4College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
  • 5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
  • 6Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt, France

Abstract

Background
To compare clinical outcomes following lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) versus RSA with latissimus dorsi transfer (LDT) in patients with poor preoperative active external rotation (ER).
Methods
We performed a systematic review per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We queried PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to identify articles reporting clinical outcomes of RSA with LDT or lateralized RSA alone performed in patients with preoperative ER ≤0°. Our primary outcomes were active ER, active forward elevation (FE), Constant score, and the incidence of complications.
Results
We included 12 RSA with LDT studies with 188 shoulders and 4 lateralized RSA without transfer studies with 250 shoulders. Mean preoperative ER in RSA with LDT was –14°, while mean preoperative ER in lateralized RSA alone was –11°. Lateralized RSA alone was associated with superior postoperative ER (28° vs. 22°, P=0.010) and Constant score (69 vs. 65, P=0.014), but similar postoperative FE (P=0.590). Pre- to postoperative improvement in ER and FE was similar between cohorts. RSA with LDT had a higher incidence of nerve-related complications (2.1% vs. 0%) and dislocation (2.8% vs. 0.8%) compared to lateralized RSA alone.
Conclusions
Both RSA with LDT and lateralized RSA are reliable options to restore ER in patients with significantly limited preoperative ER. Our analysis suggests that lateralized RSA alone is superior to RSA with LDT in patients with either a medialized or lateralized implant design and confers a lower risk of complications, particularly nerve injury and dislocation. However, the addition of an LDT may still be indicated in certain patient populations with very severe ER loss. Level of evidence: IV.

Keyword

Lateralization; Tendon transfer; Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; Shoulder replacement; Combined loss of active elevation and external rotation
Full Text Links
  • CISE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr