Acute Crit Care.  2024 Nov;39(4):554-564. 10.4266/acc.2024.00808.

Effects of closed- versus open-system intensive care units on mortality rates in patients with cancer requiring emergent surgical intervention for acute abdominal complications: a single-center retrospective study in Korea

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Critical Care Medicine, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
  • 2Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Uijeongbu, Korea
  • 3Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea

Abstract

Background
In this study, we aimed to compare the in-hospital mortality of patients with cancer who experienced acute abdominal complications that required emergent surgery in open (treatment decisions made by the primary attending physician of the patient's admission department) versus closed (treatment decisions made by intensive care unit [ICU] intensivists) ICUs.
Methods
This retrospective, single-center study enrolled patients with cancer admitted to the ICU before or after emergency surgery between November 2020 and September 2023. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were conducted to explore the associations between patient characteristics in the open and closed ICUs and in-hospital mortality.
Results
Among the 100 patients (open ICU, 49; closed ICU, 51), 23 died during hospitalization. The closed ICU group had higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores, vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation, and preoperative lactate levels and a shorter duration from diagnosis to ICU admission, surgery, and antibiotic administration than the open ICU group. Univariate analysis linked in-hospital mortality and APACHE II score, postoperative lactate levels, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), and mechanical ventilation. Multivariate analysis revealed that in-hospital mortality rate increased with CRRT use and was lower in the closed ICU.
Conclusions
Compared to an open ICU, a closed ICU was an independent factor in reducing in-hospital mortality through prompt and appropriate treatment.

Keyword

acute care surgery; continuous renal replacement therapy; intensive care unit; mortality; patients with cancer

Figure

  • Figure 1. Flowchart of the participant selection process. ICU: intensive care unit.

  • Figure 2. Forest plot of the odds ratios (ORs) for in-hospital mortality of patients with cancer requiring emergent surgery for acute abdominal complications. Treatment in the closed intensive care unit (ICU) was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality compared with the open-type ICU (P=0.025), and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) was associated with increased mortality (P=0.032). Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, postoperative lactate level, and time from diagnosis to operation were not significantly associated with in-hospital mortality.

  • Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis based on the type of intensive care unit (ICU) for patients with cancer requiring emergent surgical intervention for acute abdominal complications. Cumulative survival rate was significantly higher in the closed ICU group than in the open ICU group (P=0.033). The log-rank test was applied to compare survival curves.


Cited by  1 articles

The efficacy of intensivist-led closed-system intensive care units in improving outcomes for cancer patients requiring emergent surgical intervention
Eun Young Kim
Acute Crit Care. 2024;39(4):640-642.    doi: 10.4266/acc.2024.01256.


Reference

1. De Angelis R, Sant M, Coleman MP, Francisci S, Baili P, Pierannunzio D, et al. Cancer survival in Europe 1999-2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE: 5-a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15:23–34.
Article
2. van der Zee EN, Termorshuizen F, Benoit DD, de Keizer NF, Bakker J, Kompanje EJ, et al. One-year mortality of cancer patients with an unplanned ICU admission: a cohort analysis between 2008 and 2017 in the Netherlands. J Intensive Care Med. 2022; 37:1165–73.
Article
3. Azoulay E, Schellongowski P, Darmon M, Bauer PR, Benoit D, Depuydt P, et al. The Intensive Care Medicine research agenda on critically ill oncology and hematology patients. Intensive Care Med. 2017; 43:1366–82.
Article
4. Soares M, Caruso P, Silva E, Teles JM, Lobo SM, Friedman G, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with cancer requiring admission to intensive care units: a prospective multicenter study. Crit Care Med. 2010; 38:9–15.
Article
5. Bos MM, de Keizer NF, Meynaar IA, Bakhshi-Raiez F, de Jonge E. Outcomes of cancer patients after unplanned admission to general intensive care units. Acta Oncol. 2012; 51:897–905.
Article
6. Donovan AL, Aldrich JM, Gross AK, Barchas DM, Thornton KC, Schell-Chaple HM, et al. Interprofessional care and teamwork in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018; 46:980–90.
Article
7. Penoyer DA. Nurse staffing and patient outcomes in critical care: a concise review. Crit Care Med. 2010; 38:1521–8.
Article
8. Banerjee R, Naessens JM, Seferian EG, Gajic O, Moriarty JP, Johnson MG, et al. Economic implications of nighttime attending intensivist coverage in a medical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2011; 39:1257–62.
Article
9. van der Sluis FJ, Slagt C, Liebman B, Beute J, Mulder JW, Engel AF. The impact of open versus closed format ICU admission practices on the outcome of high risk surgical patients: a cohort analysis. BMC Surg. 2011; 11:18.
Article
10. Gajic O, Afessa B, Hanson AC, Krpata T, Yilmaz M, Mohamed SF, et al. Effect of 24-hour mandatory versus on-demand critical care specialist presence on quality of care and family and provider satisfaction in the intensive care unit of a teaching hospital. Crit Care Med. 2008; 36:36–44.
Article
11. Nawaz FA, Deo N, Surani S, Maynard W, Gibbs ML, Kashyap R. Critical care practices in the world: results of the global intensive care unit need assessment survey 2020. World J Crit Care Med. 2022; 11:169–77.
Article
12. Sakr Y, Moreira CL, Rhodes A, Ferguson ND, Kleinpell R, Pickkers P, et al. The impact of hospital and ICU organizational factors on outcome in critically ill patients: results from the Extended Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care study. Crit Care Med. 2015; 43:519–26.
13. Yang Q, Du JL, Shao F. Mortality rate and other clinical features observed in Open vs closed format intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98:e16261.
14. Hackner D, Shufelt CL, Balfe DD, Lewis MI, Elsayegh A, Braunstein GD, et al. Do faculty intensivists have better outcomes when caring for patients directly in a closed ICU versus consulting in an open ICU? Hosp Pract (1995). 2009; 37:40–50.
Article
15. Mayumi T, Yoshida M, Tazuma S, Furukawa A, Nishii O, Shigematsu K, et al. The practice guidelines for primary care of acute abdomen 2015. Jpn J Radiol. 2016; 34:80–115.
Article
16. Amin MB, Edge SB, Greene FL, Byrd DR, Brookland RK, Washington MK, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th ed. Springer;2017.
17. Gharipour A, Razavi R, Gharipour M, Modarres R, Nezafati P, Mirkheshti N. The incidence and outcome of severe hyperlactatemia in critically ill patients. Intern Emerg Med. 2021; 16:115–23.
Article
18. Kelly FE, Fong K, Hirsch N, Nolan JP. Intensive care medicine is 60 years old: the history and future of the intensive care unit. Clin Med (Lond). 2014; 14:376–9.
Article
19. Oh TK, Song IA. Trained intensivist coverage and survival outcomes in critically ill patients: a nationwide cohort study in South Korea. Ann Intensive Care. 2023; 13:4.
Article
20. Cullati S, Hudelson P, Ricou B, Nendaz M, Perneger TV, Escher M. Internists' and intensivists' roles in intensive care admission decisions: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018; 18:620.
Article
21. Coccolini F, Improta M, Sartelli M, Rasa K, Sawyer R, Coimbra R, et al. Acute abdomen in the immunocompromised patient: WSES, SIS-E, WSIS, AAST, and GAIS guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. 2021; 16:40.
Article
22. Kang MK, Oh SY, Lee H, Ryu HG. Pre and postoperative lactate levels and lactate clearance in predicting in-hospital mortality after surgery for gastrointestinal perforation. BMC Surg. 2022; 22:93.
Article
23. Oedorf K, Day DE, Lior Y, Novack V, Sanchez LD, Wolfe RE, et al. Serum lactate predicts adverse outcomes in emergency department patients with and without infection. West J Emerg Med. 2017; 18:258–66.
Article
24. Spiegelberg J, Lederer AK, Claus S, Runkel M, Utzolino S, Fichtner-Feigl S, et al. Severe hyperlactatemia in unselected surgical patients: retrospective analysis of prognostic outcome factors. BMC Surg. 2022; 22:312.
Article
25. Freire Jorge P, Wieringa N, de Felice E, van der Horst IC, Oude Lansink A, Nijsten MW. The association of early combined lactate and glucose levels with subsequent renal and liver dysfunction and hospital mortality in critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2017; 21:218.
Article
26. Wiggans MG, Starkie T, Shahtahmassebi G, Woolley T, Birt D, Erasmus P, et al. Serum arterial lactate concentration predicts mortality and organ dysfunction following liver resection. Perioper Med (Lond). 2013; 2:21.
Article
27. Jung YT, Jeon J, Park JY, Kim MJ, Lee SH, Lee JG. Addition of lactic acid levels improves the accuracy of quick sequential organ failure assessment in predicting mortality in surgical patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a retrospective study. World J Emerg Surg. 2018; 13:14.
Article
28. White KC, Serpa-Neto A, Hurford R, Clement P, Laupland KB, See E, et al. Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit: incidence, patient characteristics, timing, trajectory, treatment, and associated outcomes. A multicenter, observational study. Intensive Care Med. 2023; 49:1079–89.
Article
29. Wang Z, Zhang L, Xu F, Han D, Lyu J. The association between continuous renal replacement therapy as treatment for sepsis-associated acute kidney injury and trend of lactate trajectory as risk factor of 28-day mortality in intensive care units. BMC Emerg Med. 2022; 22:32.
Article
30. Kim DW, Jang GS, Jung KS, Jung HJ, Kim HJ, Rhee H, et al. Hospital mortality and prognostic factors in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury and cancer undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy. Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2022; 41:717–29.
Article
31. Druml W, Zajic P, Schellongowski P, Fellinger T, Metnitz B, Posch M, et al. Association of acute kidney injury receiving kidney replacement therapy with prognosis of critically ill patients with and without cancer: a retrospective study. Crit Care Med. 2021; 49:1932–42.
Article
32. Lavanchy JL, Dubuis JB, Osterwalder A, Winterhalder S, Haltmeier T, Candinas D, et al. Impact of inter-hospital transfer on outcomes in patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery: a tertiary referral center's perspective. World J Surg. 2021; 45:2703–11.
Article
33. Kokotovic D, Jensen TK. Acute abdominal pain and emergency laparotomy: bundles of care to improve patient outcomes. Br J Surg. 2023; 110:1594–6.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ACC
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr