Pediatr Emerg Med J.  2025 Jan;12(1):10-19. 10.22470/pemj.2024.01109.

A novel simulation-based Pediatric Respiratory Distress Educational Curriculum (PReDEC) for emergency medicine residents

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
  • 2Departments of Pediatrics and Anesthesia, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
  • 3Division of Medical Simulation, Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
  • 4Department of Emergency Medicine, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
  • 5Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
  • 6Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA

Abstract

Purpose
It is important for emergency physicians to be able to evaluate and manage pediatric respiratory distress, which is rare in general emergency departments. Despite this importance, the emergency departments show inconsistency in pediatric readiness, while emergency medicine (EM) residents express discomfort in caring for critically ill children due to limited exposure during their residency training. The purpose of this study was to meet this educational need by developing and implementing a curriculum to prepare EM residents to provide safe care for pediatric respiratory distress.
Methods
We prospectively assessed 20 senior EM residents after undergoing a 3-hour simulation-based curriculum at Indiana University School of Medicine. The curriculum was developed using the Kern’s methodology by content experts. Pre- and post-curriculum confidence, knowledge, competency, and situational awareness were assessed using the 5-point Likert scale, multiple-choice questions, checklists of a pediatric acute respiratory distress scenario, and a novel modified video version of the situational awareness global assessment technique, respectively.
Results
From the pre- to post-intervention phases, the confidence improved from 3.2 ± 0.4 to 3.9 ± 0.2 on the Likert scale (P < 0.001). The knowledge improved from 50.3% ± 12.9% to 75.3% ± 10.6% on the multiple-choice questions (P < 0.001). The competency improved from 46.8% ± 16.0% to 73.6% ± 10.6% (P < 0.001) with significant improvements in 7 of the 14 checklist items. The situational awareness raised both data perception (P < 0.001) and comprehension (P = 0.004) with no significant improvements in data extrapolation (P = 0.120).
Conclusion
Preliminary findings suggest that a 3-hour simulation-based curriculum for EM residents, including implementation of a novel situational awareness assessment tool, can improve learner’s confidence, knowledge, competency, and situational awareness of pediatric respiratory distress.

Keyword

Airway Management; Awareness; Ergonomics; Pediatric Emergency Medicine; Respiratory Insufficiency; Simulation Training; Surveys and Questionnaires

Figure

  • Fig. 1. The initial assessment of intubated hypoxia in pediatric patients. Modified from Pacheco et al. (20) with permission of Elsevier. ABCs: airway, breathing, and circulation, ETT: endotracheal tube, POCUS: point-of-care ultrasound.


Reference

References

1. Sakles JC, Laurin EG, Rantapaa AA, Panacek EA. Airway management in the emergency department: a one-year study of 610 tracheal intubations. Ann Emerg Med. 1998; 31:325–32.
2. Losek JD, Olson LR, Dobson JV, Glaeser PW. Tracheal intubation practice and maintaining skill competency: survey of pediatric emergency department medical directors. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008; 24:294–9.
3. Cha WC, Shin SD, Cho JS, Song KJ, Singer AJ, Kwak YH. The association between crowding and mortality in admitted pediatric patients from mixed adult-pediatric emergency departments in Korea. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011; 27:1136–41.
4. Whitfill T, Auerbach M, Scherzer DJ, Shi J, Xiang H, Stanley RM. Emergency care for children in the United States: epidemiology and trends over time. J Emerg Med. 2018; 55:423–34.
5. Gausche-Hill M, Ely M, Schmuhl P, Telford R, Remick KE, Edgerton EA, et al. A national assessment of pediatric readiness of emergency departments. JAMA Pediatr. 2015; 169:527–34.
6. Li J, Roosevelt G, McCabe K, Preotle J, Pereira F, Takayesu JK, et al. Critically ill pediatric case exposure during emergency medicine residency. J Emerg Med. 2020; 59:278–85.
7. Abulebda K, Lutfi R, Whitfill T, Abu-Sultaneh S, Leeper KJ, Weinstein E, et al. A collaborative in situ simulation-based pediatric readiness improvement program for community emergency departments. Acad Emerg Med. 2018; 25:177–85.
8. Fernandez Castelao E, Russo SG, Cremer S, Strack M, Kaminski L, Eich C, et al. Positive impact of crisis resource management training on no-flow time and team member verbalisations during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomised controlled trial. Resuscitation. 2011; 82:1338–43.
9. Yee J, Fuenning C, George R, Hejal R, Haines N, Dunn D, et al. Mechanical ventilation boot camp: a simulation-based pilot study. Crit Care Res Pract. 2016; 2016:4670672.
10. Abulebda K, Thomas A, Whitfill T, Montgomery EE, Auerbach MA. Simulation training for community emergency preparedness. Pediatr Ann. 2021; 50:e19–24.
11. Mustafa M, Lutfi R, Alsaedi H, Castelluccio P, Pearson KJ, Montgomery EE, et al. Improvement of pediatric advanced airway management in general emergency departments after a collaborative intervention program. Respir Care. 2021; 66:1866–75.
12. Cooney RR, Murano T, Ring H, Starr R, Beeson MS, Edgar L. The Emergency Medicine Milestones 2.0: setting the stage for 2025 and beyond. AEM Educ Train. 2021; 5:e10640.
13. Abu-Sultaneh S, Whitfill T, Rowan CM, Friedman ML, Pearson KJ, Berrens ZJ, et al. Improving simulated pediatric airway management in community emergency departments using a collaborative program with a pediatric academic medical center. Respir Care. 2019; 64:1073–81.
14. Ryan MS. Simulation of respiratory distress for the pediatrics clerkship. MedEdPORTAL. 2012; 8:9138.
15. Kern DE. A six-step approach to curriculum development. In: Thomas PA, Kern DE, Hughes MT, editors. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach. 2nd ed. The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2009. p. 5-9.
16. Hein GE. Constructivist learning theory. Paper presented at: CECA (International Committee of Museum Educators) Conference; October 15-22, 1991; Jerusalem, Israel. CECA; 1991. 10 p.
17. Rudolph JW, Simon R, Rivard P, Dufresne RL, Raemer DB. Debriefing with good judgment: combining rigorous feedback with genuine inquiry. Anesthesiol Clin. 2007; 25:361–76.
18. Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med. 2004; 79(10 Suppl):S70–81.
19. Khemani RG, Smith LS, Zimmerman JJ, Erickson S, Ericsson KA; Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference Group. Pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: definition, incidence, and epidemiology: proceedings from the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015; 16(5 Suppl 1):S23–40.
20. Pacheco GS, Mendelson J, Gaspers M. Pediatric ventilator management in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2018; 36:401–13.
21. Ber R, Alroy G. Twenty years of experience using trigger films as a teaching tool. Acad Med. 2001; 76:656–8.
22. Calder LA, Bhandari A, Mastoras G, Day K, Momtahan K, Falconer M, et al. Healthcare providers’ perceptions of a situational awareness display for emergency department resuscitation: a simulation qualitative study. Int J Qual Health Care. 2018; 30:16–22.
23. Coolen E, Draaisma J, Loeffen J. Measuring situation awareness and team effectiveness in pediatric acute care by using the situation global assessment technique. Eur J Pediatr. 2019; 178:837–50.
24. Jonsson K, Brulin C, Härgestam M, Lindkvist M, Hultin M. Do team and task performance improve after training situation awareness? A randomized controlled study of interprofessional intensive care teams. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021; 29:73.
25. Cooper S, Porter J, Peach L. Measuring situation awareness in emergency settings: a systematic review of tools and outcomes. Open Access Emerg Med. 2013; 6:1–7.
26. Endsley MR. Direct measurement of situation awareness: validity and use of SAGAT. In: Endsley MR, Garland DJ, editors. Situation awareness analysis and measurement. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2000. p. 147-73.
27. Vygotsky LS. Interaction between learning and development. In: Gauvain M, Cole M, editors. Readings on the development of children. 2nd ed. W. H. Freeman and Company; 1997. p. 34-41.
28. Ng C, Primiani N, Orchanian-Cheff A. Rapid cycle deliberate practice in healthcare simulation: a scoping review. Med Sci Educ. 2021; 31:2105–20.
29. Rosenman ED, Dixon AJ, Webb JM, Brolliar S, Golden SJ, Jones KA, et al. A simulation-based approach to measuring team situational awareness in emergency medicine: a multicenter, observational study. Acad Emerg Med. 2018; 25:196–204.
Full Text Links
  • PEMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr