J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg.  2024 Dec;26(4):373-382. 10.7461/jcen.2024.E2024.04.006.

Safety and effectiveness of Neuroform Atlas stent-assisted coil embolization for ruptured intracranial aneurysms

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Republic of Korea

Abstract


Objective
The treatment outcomes of ruptured intracranial aneurysms using the Neuroform Atlas stent were evaluated.
Methods
This study represents a retrospective review that included patients who underwent endovascular treatment for ruptured aneurysms at a single institution. Between January 2018 and September 2022, endovascular treatments including simple coiling or Neuroform Atlas stent-assisted coil embolization were performed in 191 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms.
Results
Intraprocedural rupture was observed in 11 (8.7%) patients in the Simple Coiling (SC) group, which was slightly higher than that in 4 (6.3%) patients in the Neuroform Atlas stent-assisted coiling (NASAC) group (p=0.241). However, Thromboembolic event (TEE) was slightly more prevalent in the NASAC group, with 4 (6.3%) cases as compared to the 5 (3.9%) cases in the SC group (p=0.235). The retreatment rate was slightly higher in the SC group, with 19 (26.4%) patients as compared to the 10 patients (22.2%) in the NASAC group (p=0.342).
Conclusions
The use of the Neuroform Atlas stent (NAS) for ruptured aneurysms might be safe and effective.

Keyword

Aneurysmal subarachnoid Hemorrhage; Endovascular aneurysm repair; Neuroform Atlas stent; Stent-assisted coil embolization

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Flow diagram of patient selection


Reference

1. Benitez RP, Silva MT, Klem J, Veznedaroglu E, Rosenwasser RH. Endovascular occlusion of wide-necked aneurysms with a new intracranial microstent (Neuroform) and detachable coils. Neurosurgery. 2004; Jun. 54(6):1359–67. Discussion 68.
Article
2. Bodily KD, Cloft HJ, Lanzino G, Fiorella DJ, White PM, Kallmes DF. Stent-assisted coiling in acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a qualitative, systematic review of the literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011; Aug. 32(7):1232–6.
Article
3. Cho WS, Kim JE, Park SQ, Ko JK, Kim DW, Park JC, et al. Korean Clinical Practice Guidelines for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2018; Mar. 61(2):127–66.
Article
4. Choi HH, Cho YD, Han MH, Cho WS, Kim JE, Lee JJ, et al. Antiplatelet Premedication-Free Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization in Acutely Ruptured Aneurysms. World Neurosurg. 2018; Jun. 114:e1152–e60.
Article
5. Committee for Guidelines for Management of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage JSoSfCS. Evidence-based guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. English Edition. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2012; 52(6):355–429.
6. Delgado Almandoz JE, Kadkhodayan Y, Crandall BM, Scholz JM, Fease JL, Anderson RE, et al. Diagnostic yield of delayed neurovascular imaging in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, negative initial CT and catheter angiograms, and a negative 7 day repeat catheter angiogram. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014; Oct. 6(8):637–42.
Article
7. Edwards NJ, Jones WH, Sanzgiri A, Corona J, Dannenbaum M, Chen PR. Antiplatelet therapy for the prevention of peri-coiling thromboembolism in high-risk patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2017; Dec. 127(6):1326–32.
Article
8. Hochholzer W, Trenk D, Frundi D, Blanke P, Fischer B, Andris K, et al. Time dependence of platelet inhibition after a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel in a large, unselected cohort of candidates for percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2005; May. 111(20):2560–4.
Article
9. Jankowitz BT, Hanel R, Jadhav AP, Loy DN, Frei D, Siddiqui AH, et al. Neuroform Atlas Stent System for the treatment of intracranial aneurysm: primary results of the Atlas Humanitarian Device Exemption cohort. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019; Aug. 11(8):801–6.
Article
10. Kim S, Choi JH, Kang M, Cha JK, Huh JT. Safety and efficacy of intravenous tirofiban as antiplatelet premedication for stent-assisted coiling in acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016; Mar. 37(3):508–14.
Article
11. Kung DK, Policeni BA, Capuano AW, Rossen JD, Jabbour PM, Torner JC, et al. Risk of ventriculostomy-related hemorrhage in patients with acutely ruptured aneurysms treated using stent-assisted coiling. J Neurosurg. 2011; Apr. 114(4):1021–7.
Article
12. Liang XD, Wang ZL, Li TX, He YK, Bai WX, Wang YY, et al. Safety and efficacy of a new prophylactic tirofiban protocol without oral intraoperative antiplatelet therapy for endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016; Nov. 8(11):1148–53.
Article
13. Limaye K, Zanaty M, Hudson J, Nakagawa D, Al Kasab S, Alvarez C, et al. The Safety and Efficacy of Continuous Tirofiban as a Monoantiplatelet Therapy in the Management of Ruptured Aneurysms Treated Using Stent-Assisted Coiling or Flow Diversion and Requiring Ventricular Drainage. Neurosurgery. 2019; Dec. 85(6):E1037–E42.
Article
14. Ma Y, Jia C, Zhang T, Feng Y, Chen X, Zhao W. Safety and efficacy of intravenous tirofiban for stent-assisted coiling in acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A single center experience. Interv Neuroradiol. 2022; Aug. 28(4):476–81.
Article
15. Muto M, Giurazza F, Ambrosanio G, Vassallo P, Briganti F, Tecame M, et al. Stent-assisted coiling in ruptured cerebral aneurysms: multi-center experience in acute phase. Radiol Med. 2017; Jan. 122(1):43–52.
Article
16. Phan K, Huo YR, Jia F, Phan S, Rao PJ, Mobbs RJ, et al. Meta-analysis of stent-assisted coiling versus coiling-only for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. J Clin Neurosci. 2016; Sep. 31:15–22.
Article
17. Russo R, Bradac GB, Castellan L, Gallesio I, Garbossa D, Iannucci G, et al. Neuroform Atlas stent-assisted coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A multicenter study. J Neuroradiol. 2021; Nov. 48(6):479–85.
Article
18. Sayin B, Karaman A, Balci S, Akmangit I, Daglioglu E, Arat A. Dual stenting with new-generation stents for aneurysm embolization in acute subarachnoid hemorrhage. World Neurosurg. 2021; Oct. 154:e102–e8.
Article
19. Steiner T, Juvela S, Unterberg A, Jung C, Forsting M, Rinkel G, et al. European Stroke Organization guidelines for the management of intracranial aneurysms and subarachnoid haemorrhage. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013; 35(2):93–112.
Article
20. Tahtinen OI, Vanninen RL, Manninen HI, Rautio R, Haapanen A, Niskakangas T, et al. Wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: Treatment with stent-assisted coil embolization during acute (<72 hours) subarachnoid hemorrhage--experience in 61 consecutive patients. Radiology. 2009; Oct. 253(1):199–208.
Article
21. Taylor RA, Callison RC, Martin CO, Hayakawa M, Chaloupka JC. Acutely ruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms treated with stent-assisted coiling: Complications and outcomes in 42 consecutive patients. J Neurointerv Surg. 2010; Mar. 2(1):23–30.
Article
22. Yang H, Sun Y, Jiang Y, Lv X, Zhao Y, Li Y, et al. Comparison of Stent-Assisted Coiling vs Coiling Alone in 563 Intracranial Aneurysms: Safety and Efficacy at a High-Volume Center. Neurosurgery. 2015; Aug. 77(2):241–7. Discussion 7.
23. Yi HJ, Shin DS, Kim BT, Lee DH, Sung JH. Comparison of Neuroform Atlas stent-assisted coiling and coiling alone in ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A propensity score matching analysis. Neurosurgery. 2023; Mar. 92(3):607–14.
Article
24. Zhang X, Zuo Q, Tang H, Xue G, Yang P, Zhao R, et al. Stent-assisted coiling versus non stent-assisted coiling for the management of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A meta-analysis and systematic review. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019; May. 11(5):489–96.
Full Text Links
  • JCEN
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr