J Minim Invasive Spine Surg Tech.  2023 Jul;8(Suppl 1):S29-S38. 10.21182/jmisst.2023.00801.

Comparison of Postoperative Bone Healing in Patients With Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Microscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
  • 2Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract


Objective
Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar discectomy and microscopic lumbar discectomy are typical surgical treatments for spinal disease that are performed in different environment. This study investigated differences in bone healing at the postoperative laminecrtomy site between 2 surgical treatments performed in different environments.
Methods
From January 2018 to June 2021, 66 patients who underwent laminectomy at Department of Neurosurgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were matched for sex, age, body mass index, bone mineral density, and follow-up duration at a 1:2 matching ratio and were divided into the UBE group (22 patients) and the microscopic discectomy group (44 patients). We investigated the site of laminectomy shown on preoperative and postoperative x-ray images using ImageJ software. The factors related to bone healing were also investigated.
Results
The average bone healing area was 69.59 mm2 in the UBE group and 44.56 mm2 in the microscopic discectomy group, constituting a significant difference (p = 0.022). The remaining laminectomy area was significantly lower in the UBE group than in the microscopic discectomy group (13.91 mm2 vs. 53.84 mm2, p < 0.001). The bone recovery ratio in the UBE group was 85.42%, compared to 51.33% in the microscopic discectomy group, which was a significant difference (p < 0.001). The primary laminectomy area, bone healing during 6 months, and clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the 2 groups.
Conclusion
Compared with the microscopic discectomy group, the UBE group had a larger bone healing area and a higher bone recovery ratio for patients with lumbar discectomy. These findings suggest that preserving normal structures is more feasible during UBE than during microscopic surgery.

Keyword

Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy; Bone healing; Laminectomy area; Microscopic open surgery
Full Text Links
  • JMISST
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr