Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol.  2024 Nov;17(4):346-354. 10.21053/ceo.2024.00109.

Long-Term Assessment of Speech and Swallowing Function in Laryngopharyngeal Cancer Patients After J-Flap Reconstruction

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
  • 2Voice Center, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
  • 3School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
  • 4Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan

Abstract


Objectives
. A novel J-shaped anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap reconstruction technique was developed to simultaneously restore swallowing and speech functions in patients following total laryngopharyngectomy. This study aimed to assess the outcomes and surgical complications in patients who underwent J-flap reconstruction over time.
Methods
. Patients who underwent J-shaped ALT flap phonatory tube reconstruction were enrolled. Surgical morbidities and outcomes were evaluated every 3 months post-surgery for a period of 12 months or until death.
Results
. Of the 36 patients, 13 underwent circumferential pharyngeal wall resection (circumferential defect [CD] group), and 23 underwent partial resection (partial defect [PD] group). After 12 months, 97% of the patients were able to resume oral intake without the need for a nasogastric tube, and 50% achieved fluent speech using the reconstructed phonatory tube. The CD group experienced a higher rate of delayed healing than the PD group (30.8% vs. 0%, p=0.012). Additionally, the PD group showed significantly higher percentages of individuals consuming solid food at both the 3- and 12-month intervals than the CD group (81.0% vs. 23.1% and 78.9% vs. 40%, respectively).
Conclusions
. This study investigated the progression of speech and swallowing functions over time after reconstruction of the voice tube with a J-flap. Using a J-shaped ALT flap phonatory tube effectively restored both speech and swallowing functions, providing long-term benefits, regardless of whether the defect was circumferential or partial.

Keyword

Laryngopharyngeal Neoplasms; Surgical Flaps; Speech Disorders; Swallowing Disorders; Quality of Life; Laryngectomy; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures

Figure

  • Fig. 1. (A) The J-designed anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap comprises two parts: a trapezoidal section (TS) for pharyngeal reconstruction and a phonatory tube section (PS) distally for phonatory tube (PT) creation. (B) The PS is longitudinally tubularized to form the PT, and a catheter is inserted to maintain the tract’s patency during the healing process. (C, D) In cases of partial resection of the pharyngeal wall, the TS flap was anastomosed side-to-side with the residual pharyngeal wall.

  • Fig. 2. (A) The design of the trapezoidal section (TS) for esophageal reconstruction is based on defects in the pharyngeal wall. In the circumferential defect group, the TS flap was rolled into a tube and joined to both the distal and proximal stumps. (B) In the partial defect group, the TS flap was sutured in two places, with each edge of the TS flap being separately attached to the remaining pharyngeal wall. PT, phonatory tube.

  • Fig. 3. Post-surgical view of the patient’s stoma, showing the opening of the phonatory tube positioned on the left side of the stoma (arrow).

  • Fig. 4. (A) The proportion of fluent speakers who use phonatory tube speech between two groups over a period of up to 2 years. (B) Comparison of postoperative morbidity between the circumferential defect (CD) and partial defect (PD) groups. The incidence of delayed healing and esophageal fistula is higher in patients with a circumferential defect. (C) The proportion of patients consuming a regular oral diet without limitations or the need for special preparation, among all patients and within the PD and CD groups, up to 2 years. a)Delayed healing: delayed healing at the neopharynx anastomosis, as indicated by an esophagogram conducted two weeks after surgery that revealed barium leakage. b)Esophageal fistula: leakage from the esophagus requiring surgical repair within 1 year after surgery. *P<0.05.


Reference

1. Koh HK, Tan NC, Tan BK, Ooi AS. Comparison of outcomes of fasciocutaneous free flaps and jejunal free flaps in pharyngolaryngoesophageal reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Plast Surg. 2019; Jun. 82(6):646–52.
Article
2. Disa JJ, Pusic AL, Hidalgo DA, Cordeiro PG. Microvascular reconstruction of the hypopharynx: defect classification, treatment algorithm, and functional outcome based on 165 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003; Feb. 111(2):652–63.
Article
3. Sharp DA, Theile DR, Cook R, Coman WB. Long-term functional speech and swallowing outcomes following pharyngolaryngectomy with free jejunal flap reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2010; Jun. 64(6):743–6.
Article
4. Perez-Smith D, Wagels M, Theile DR. Jejunal free flap reconstruction of the pharyngolaryngectomy defect: 368 consecutive cases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013; Jan. 66(1):9–15.
Article
5. Wong CH, Wei FC. Anterolateral thigh flap. Head Neck. 2010; Apr. 32(4):529–40.
Article
6. Wei FC, Jain V, Celik N, Chen HC, Chuang DC, Lin CH. Have we found an ideal soft-tissue flap? An experience with 672 anterolateral thigh flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002; Jun. 109(7):2219–30.
Article
7. Yu P, Hanasono MM, Skoracki RJ, Baumann DP, Lewin JS, Weber RS, et al. Pharyngoesophageal reconstruction with the anterolateral thigh flap after total laryngopharyngectomy. Cancer. 2010; Apr. 116(7):1718–24.
Article
8. Yu P, Lewin JS, Reece GP, Robb GL. Comparison of clinical and functional outcomes and hospital costs following pharyngoesophageal reconstruction with the anterolateral thigh free flap versus the jejunal flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; Mar. 117(3):968–74.
Article
9. Yu P, Robb GL. Pharyngoesophageal reconstruction with the anterolateral thigh flap: a clinical and functional outcomes study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; Dec. 116(7):1845–55.
Article
10. Hsieh YH, Fang TJ, Huang SF, Kang CJ, Liao CT, Hung SY, et al. Synchronous reconstruction of esophageal defect and voice with J-flap after laryngopharyngectomy: indications and outcomes. Oral Oncol. 2020; Nov. 110:104947.
Article
11. Lu YA, Pei YC, Chuang HF, Lin LY, Hsin LJ, Kang CJ, et al. Speech performance after anterolateral thigh phonatory tube reconstruction for total laryngectomy. Laryngoscope. 2021; Jun. 131(6):1349–57.
Article
12. Tsao CK, Marchi F, Kang CJ, Sampieri C, Lu YA, Huang SF, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of vocal outcomes and quality of life after total laryngectomy and voice restoration with j-flap and tracheoesophageal puncture. Cancers (Basel). 2022; Jan. 14(3):544.
Article
13. Singer S, Arraras JI, Chie WC, Fisher SE, Galalae R, Hammerlid E, et al. Performance of the EORTC questionnaire for the assessment of quality of life in head and neck cancer patients EORTC QLQ-H&N35: a methodological review. Qual Life Res. 2013; Oct. 22(8):1927–41.
Article
14. Wong CH, Wei FC. Microsurgical free flap in head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck. 2010; Sep. 32(9):1236–45.
Article
15. Reece GP, Bengtson BP, Schusterman MA. Reconstruction of the pharynx and cervical esophagus using free jejunal transfer. Clin Plast Surg. 1994; Jan. 21(1):125–36.
Article
16. Nagel TH, Hayden RE. Advantages and limitations of free and pedicled flaps in reconstruction of pharyngoesophageal defects. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014; Oct. 22(5):407–13.
Article
17. Huang TC, Hsu YC, Chen HC, Chang SC, Chen HH. Functional outcome analysis after anterolateral thigh flap reconstruction of pharyngoesophageal defect. Ann Plast Surg. 2015; Aug. 75(2):174–9.
Article
18. Chen HC, Tang YB, Chang MH. Reconstruction of the voice after laryngectomy. Clin Plast Surg. 2001; Apr. 28(2):389–402.
Article
19. Chen HC, Mardini S, Yang CW. Voice reconstruction using the free ileocolon flap versus the pneumatic artificial larynx: a comparison of patients’ preference and experience following laryngectomy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006; Dec. 59(12):1269–75.
Article
20. McAuliffe MJ, Ward EC, Bassett L, Perkins K. Functional speech outcomes after laryngectomy and pharyngolaryngectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000; Jun. 126(6):705–9.
Article
21. Ward EC, Bishop B, Frisby J, Stevens M. Swallowing outcomes following laryngectomy and pharyngolaryngectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002; Feb. 128(2):181–6.
Article
22. Ward EC, Koh SK, Frisby J, Hodge R. Differential modes of alaryngeal communication and long-term voice outcomes following pharyngolaryngectomy and laryngectomy. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2003; Jan-Feb. 55(1):39–49.
Article
23. Lewin JS, Baumgart LM, Barrow MP, Hutcheson KA. Device life of the tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis revisited. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017; Jan. 143(1):65–71.
Article
24. Deschler DG, Herr MW, Kmiecik JR, Sethi R, Bunting G. Tracheoesophageal voice after total laryngopharyngectomy reconstruction: jejunum versus radial forearm free flap. Laryngoscope. 2015; Dec. 125(12):2715–21.
Article
25. Chen WF, Chang KP, Chen CH, Shyu VB, Kao HK. Outcomes of anterolateral thigh flap reconstruction for salvage laryngopharyngectomy for hypopharyngeal cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. PLoS One. 2013; Jan. 8(1):e53985.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CEO
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr