1. Cunha GR, Baskin L. Development of human male and female urogenital tracts. Differentiation. 2018; 103:1–4.
Article
2. Bombard DS 2nd, Mousa SA. Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome: complications, diagnosis and possible treatment options: a review. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014; 30:618–23.
Article
3. Koff AK. Development of the vagina in the human fetus. Contrib Embryol. 1933; 24:59–91.
4. Sultan C, Biason-Lauber A, Philibert P. Mayer-Rokitansky- Kuster-Hauser syndrome: recent clinical and genetic findings. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2009; 25:8–11.
Article
5. McQuillan SK, Grover SR. Systematic review of sexual function and satisfaction following the management of vaginal agenesis. Int Urogynecol J. 2014; 25:1313–20.
Article
6. Hensle TW, Reiley EA. Vaginal replacement in children and young adults. J Urol. 1998; 159:1035–8.
Article
7. Kölle A, Taran FA, Rall K, Schöller D, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY. Neovagina creation methods and their potential impact on subsequent uterus transplantation: a review. BJOG. 2019; 126:1328–35.
Article
8. Callens N, De Cuypere G, De Sutter P, Monstrey S, Weyers S, Hoebeke P, et al. An update on surgical and nonsurgical treatments for vaginal hypoplasia. Hum Reprod Update. 2014; 20:775–801.
Article
9. McQuillan SK, Grover SR. Dilation and surgical management in vaginal agenesis: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2014; 25:299–311.
Article
10. Dias MTPM, Bilhar APM, Rios LC, Costa BA, Lima EM Júnior, Alves APNN, et al. Neovaginoplasty using nile tilapia fish skin as a new biologic graft in patients with mayer-rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020; 27:966–72.
Article
11. Torres ATS, Lopes BB, Silva AM, Dias MTPM, Bruno ZV, Nunes APN, et al. Neovaginoplasty with tilapia fish skin: a series of eleven cases. Int Urogynecol J. 2022; 33:2185–93.
Article
12. Rathod S, Samal SK. Secondary vaginal atresia treated with vaginoplasty using amnion graft: a case report. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014; 8:OD05–6.
Article
13. Kathpalia SK. Creating neovagina using amnion. Med J Armed Forces India. 2016; 72(Suppl 1):S120–2.
Article
14. Sharma D, Dahiya K, Chechi K, Sirohiwal D. Vaginoplasty with amnion grafting: an experience. J Gynecol Surg. 2008; 24:61–6.
Article
15. Avsar AF, Tas EE, Keskin HL, Yeğin GF. Vaginoplasty using human amniotic membranes a report of five patients. J Reprod Med. 2016; 61:483–8.
16. Fotopoulou C, Sehouli J, Gehrmann N, Schoenborn I, Lichtenegger W. Functional and anatomic results of amnion vaginoplasty in young women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2010; 94:317–23.
Article
17. Nisolle M, Donnez J. Vaginoplasty using amniotic membranes in cases of vaginal agenesis or after vaginectomy. J Gynecol Surg. 1992; 8:25–30.
Article
18. Bleggi-Torres LF, Werner B, Piazza MJ. Ultrastructural study of the neovagina following the utilization of human amniotic membrane for treatment of congenital absence of the vagina. Braz J Med Biol Res. 1997; 30:861–4.
Article
19. McINDOE A. The treatment of congenital absence and obliterative conditions of the vagina. Br J Plast Surg. 1950; 2:254–67.
20. Anis TH, Gheit SA, Saied HS, Al kherbash SA. Arabic translation of female sexual function index and validation in an Egyptian population. J Sex Med. 2011; 8:3370–8.
Article
21. Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, et al. The female sexual function index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000; 26:191–208.
Article
22. Wiegel M, Meston C, Rosen R. The female sexual function index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. J Sex Marital Ther. 2005; 31:1–20.
Article
23. Herlin M, Bay Bjørn AM, Jørgensen LK, Trolle B, Petersen MB. Treatment of vaginal agenesis in Mayer-Rokitansky- Küster-Hauser syndrome in Denmark: a nationwide comparative study of anatomical outcome and complications. Fertil Steril. 2018; 110:746–53.
24. Cao L, Wang Y, Li Y, Xu H. Prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic peritoneal vaginoplasty with laparoscopic sigmoid vaginoplasty for treating congenital vaginal agenesis. Int Urogynecol J. 2013; 24:1173–9.
Article
25. ACOG Committee on Adolescent Health Care. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 355: vaginal agenesis: diagnosis, management, and routine care. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 108:1605–9.
26. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology ACOG Committee Opinion. Nonsurgical diagnosis and management of vaginal agenesis. Number 274, July 2002. Committee on Adolescent Health Care. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002; 79:167–70.
27. Committee Opinion: No. 562: Müllerian agenesis: diagnosis, management, and treatment. Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 121:1134–7.
28. Eskandarlou M, Azimi M, Rabiee S, Seif Rabiee MA. The healing effect of amniotic membrane in burn patients. World J Plast Surg. 2016; 5:39–44.
29. Schmiedova I, Dembickaja A, Kiselakova L, Nowakova B, Slama P. Using of amniotic membrane derivatives for the treatment of chronic wounds. Membranes (Basel). 2021; 11:941.
Article
30. Akle CA, Adinolfi M, Welsh KI, Leibowitz S, McColl I. Immunogenicity of human amniotic epithelial cells after transplantation into volunteers. Lancet. 1981; 2:1003–5.
Article
31. Zare-Bidaki M, Sadrinia S, Erfani S, Afkar E, Ghanbarzade N. Antimicrobial properties of amniotic and chorionic membranes: a comparative study of two human fetal sacs. J Reprod Infertil. 2017; 18:218–24.
32. Vatsa R, Bharti J, Roy KK, Kumar S, Sharma JB, Singh N, et al. Evaluation of amnion in creation of neovagina in women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2017; 108:341–5.
Article