Ann Liver Transplant.  2021 May;1(1):29-47. 10.52604/alt.21.0005.

Selection criteria of living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma developed in Korean transplant centers

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

With accumulated experience on living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), several major Korean transplant centers presented institutional or multicenter selection criteria of LDLT for HCC based on their own experience. This study intended to review the selection criteria of LDLT for HCC developed in the major Korean LT centers. Extended criteria for primary liver transplantation (LT) were developed in Asan Medical Center (AMC) in 2008, the Catholic University of Korea in 2012, Samsung Medical Center in 2014, National Cancer Center Korea in 2016, the model to predict tumor recurrence after LDLT (MoRAL) in three centers in 2016, A-P 200 criteria in Pusan National University in 2016, patient selection by tumor markers in LT for advanced HCC in eight centers, composite criteria using clinical and PET factors in two centers in 2019, tumor size and number, AFP, PIVKA-II, PET (SNAPP) score in AMC in 2021, and quantitative prognostic prediction using AFP-PIVKA-II-tumor volume (ADV) score in AMC in 2021. The criteria for salvage LT were developed from a multicenter study involving three centers in 2014 and from AMC in 2020. Posttransplant prognostic prediction models for early or non-viable HCC were developed in AMC for super-selection criteria in 2011 and pretransplant treatment-induced complete tumor necrosis in 2017. The importance of tumor biology in HCC treatment has been emphasized more than before. The expression of serum tumor markers is a surrogate biomarker reflecting the tumor biology. Pretransplant radiological assessment of HCC combined with tumor marker expression or PET finding will provide reliable information that will assist the decision to perform LDLT in patients with HCC of various stages.

Keyword

Hepatocellular carcinoma; Tumor marker; Tumor biology; Prognosis; Prediction

Figure

  • Figure 1 Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence and patient survival curves for 206 surviving patients after application of the Asan Medical Center criteria based on explant pathology. (A) Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence curves showed 1‐year, 3‐year, and 5‐year recurrence rates of 5.8%, 13%, and 15%, respectively, within the criteria and 43.3%, 73.6%, and 73.6%, respectively, beyond the criteria (p<0.001). (B) The overall patient survival curves showed 1-year, 3‐year, and 5‐year survival rates of 94.3%, 87.5%, and 81.6%, respectively, within the criteria and 71.9%, 37.2%, and 20.7%, respectively, beyond the criteria (p<0.001) [10].

  • Figure 2 Disease-free and overall survival comparison based on the Milan criteria and Catholic Medical Center (CMC) criteria. (A) Disease-free survival. (B) Overall patient survival [11].

  • Figure 3 Disease-free survival curves according to the Samsung Medical Center (SMC) criteria based on (A) radiological and (B) pathological findings [12].

  • Figure 4 Overall and disease-free survival rates according to the National Cancer Center Korea (NCCK) criteria with preoperative imaging findings (A) and explant pathology (B) [13].

  • Figure 5 The cumulative risk of tumor recurrence according to the Milan criteria (MC) and the model to predict tumor recurrence after living donor liver transplantation (MoRAL) score using a cut off of 314.8. The risk of recurrence decreased in the following order: beyond MC/high MoRAL score >within MC/high MoRAL score >beyond MC/low MoRAL >within MC/low MoRAL score (p<0.001). The patients within MC with high MoRAL score experienced higher recurrence than the patients beyond MC with low MoRAL score (hazard ratio=2.56, p=0.035) [15].

  • Figure 6 Overall survival and disease-free survival according to the A-P 200 criteria. (A) The 3-year overall survival rates for patients who were within and patients who exceeded the A-P 200 criteria were 89.2% and 90.3%, respectively (p=0.92). (B) The 3-year disease-free survival rates for the patients who were within and patients who exceeded the A-P 200 criteria were 90.0% and 43.6%, respectively (p<0.001) [16].

  • Figure 7 Recurrence‐free survival after liver transplantation (LT) in subgroups with far advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. (A) Comparison of tumor markers in only patients with tumor size ≥10 cm. (B) Comparison of tumor markers in only patients with 10 or more tumors. (C) Comparison of tumor markers in only patients with macrovascular invasion. (D) Comparison of macrovascular invasion for all patients with far advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. There were significant differences between the low‐risk (AFP+PIVKA‐II ≤300) and high‐risk (AFP+PIVKA‐II>300) patients in all subgroups. The presence of macrovascular invasion was not as effective as the sum of AFP+PIVKA‐II to predict tumor recurrence in the far advanced group [17].

  • Figure 8 Kaplan-Meier survival curves according to each patient selection criteria. In comparison with other criteria (A–E), the composite criteria exhibited the highest predictive value for recurrence-free survival (RFS) (F) [18].

  • Figure 9 Kaplan‐Meier probability of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence within 5 years for living donor liver transplant recipients in the development and validation groups [19].

  • Figure 10 Tumor recurrence and patient survival according to the pretransplant ADV scores in the treatment-naïve (TN) and pretransplant-treated (PT) groups. (A) Tumor recurrence (left) and overall patient survival (right) curves according to the pretransplant ADV scores in the TN group. (B) Tumor recurrence (left) and overall patient survival (right) curves according to the explant ADV scores in the TN group [20].

  • Figure 11 Tumor recurrence and patient survival curves according to the pretransplant ADV score with a cutoff of 5log. (A) Tumor recurrence. (B) Overall patient survival [20].

  • Figure 12 Prognostic prediction diagrams according to the ADV scores. Diagrams showing the probability of tumor recurrence (A) and overall patient survival (B) at posttransplant 5 years according to the prediction model using pretransplant ADV scores [20].

  • Figure 13 Survival analyses of patients after salvage liver transplantation according to the number of risk factors (tumor recurrence within 8 months after liver resection, serum AFP levels >200 ng/mL at transplantation, beyond the Milan criteria at transplantation). (A) Recurrence‐free survival was significantly decreased with an increasing number of risk factors (p<0.001) except between the subgroups with 1 and 2 risk factors (not significant). (B) The overall survival did not differ between subgroups with 1, 2 or 3 risk factors; however, the survival for all these subgroups was significantly decreased in comparison to the survival of the subgroup with no risk factors (p<0.001) [22].

  • Figure 14 Posttransplant disease-free survival (DFS) curves according to (A) the duration of disease-free survival period after hepatectomy and (B) the interval between hepatectomy and living donor liver transplantation [23].

  • Figure 15 Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in 125 patients who underwent salvage living donor liver transplantation. The patients were also stratified by 1log intervals of pretransplant ADV scores (A, B) and by pretransplant ADV score cutoffs of 4.0 log and 6.0 log (C, D) [23].

  • Figure 16 Disease-free survival (DFS) in (A, B) 86 patients within the Milan criteria (C, D) and in 39 patients beyond the Milan criteria stratified according to 1log intervals of explant ADV scores (A, C) and by two explant ADV score cutoffs of 4.0 log and 6.0 log (B, D) [23].

  • Figure 17 Cumulative tumor recurrence rates in patients with incidentally diagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma (iHCC) and untreated small pretransplant known hepatocellular carcinoma (pkHCC) ≤2.0 cm in size (p=0.27) [24].

  • Figure 18 Comparison of tumor recurrence and patient survival curves after hepatic resection (HR) and liver transplantation (LT). (A) Comparison of the tumor recurrence curves showed p<0.001 between the HR groups and p=0.019 between the LT groups. (B) Comparison of the patient survival curves showed p<0.001 between the HR groups and p=0.11 between the LT groups [25].


Cited by  1 articles

Twenty-year longitudinal follow-up after liver transplantation: a single-center experience with 251 consecutive patients
Minjae Kim, Shin Hwang, Chul-Soo Ahn, Deok-Bog Moon, Tae-Yong Ha, Gi-Won Song, Dong-Hwan Jung, Gil-Chun Park, Ki-Hun Kim, Jung-Man Namgoong, Woo-Hyoung Kang, Young-In Yoon, Hwui-Dong Cho, Byeong-Gon Na, Sang Hoon Kim, Sung-Gyu Lee
Korean J Transplant. 2022;36(1):45-53.    doi: 10.4285/kjt.21.0031.


Reference

References

1. Forner A, Llovet JM, Bruix J. 2012; Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 379:1245–1255. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61347-0.
2. Yuen MF, Hou JL, Chutaputti A. Asia Pacific Working Party on Prevention of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. 2009; Hepatocellular carcinoma in the Asia pacific region. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 24:346–353. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.05784.x. PMID: 19220670.
3. Llovet JM, Bruix J. 2008; Novel advancements in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma in 2008. J Hepatol. 48 Suppl 1:S20–S37. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.01.022. PMID: 18304676.
4. Omata M, Cheng AL, Kokudo N, Kudo M, Lee JM, Jia J, et al. 2017; Asia-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update. Hepatol Int. 11:317–370. DOI: 10.1007/s12072-017-9799-9. PMID: 28620797. PMCID: PMC5491694.
5. Song TJ, Ip EW, Fong Y. 2004; Hepatocellular carcinoma: current surgical management. Gastroenterology. 127(5 Suppl 1):S248–S260. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.09.039. PMID: 15508091.
6. Sapisochin G, Bruix J. 2017; Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: outcomes and novel surgical approaches. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 14:203–217. DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.193. PMID: 28053342.
7. de Villa V, Lo CM. 2007; Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in Asia. Oncologist. 12:1321–1331. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.12-11-1321. PMID: 18055852.
8. Hwang S, Lee SG, Belghiti J. 2010; Liver transplantation for HCC: its role: Eastern and Western perspectives. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 17:443–448. DOI: 10.1007/s00534-009-0241-0. PMID: 19885638.
9. Kang SH, Hwang S, Ahn CS, Kim KH, Moon DB, Ha TY, et al. 2020; Changes in the indications for living donor liver transplantation: single-institution experience of 3,145 cases over 10 years. Korean J Transplant. 34:47–54.
10. Lee SG, Hwang S, Moon DB, Ahn CS, Kim KH, Sung KB, et al. 2008; Expanded indication criteria of living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma at one large-volume center. Liver Transpl. 14:935–945. DOI: 10.1002/lt.21445. PMID: 18581465.
11. Choi HJ, Kim DG, Na GH, Hong TH, You YK. 2012; Extended criteria for living donor liver transplantation in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Transplant Proc. 44:399–402. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.01.019. PMID: 22410027.
12. Kim JM, Kwon CH, Joh JW, Park JB, Lee JH, Kim GS, et al. 2014; Expanded criteria for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Transplant Proc. 46:726–729. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.11.037. PMID: 24767334.
13. Lee SD, Lee B, Kim SH, Joo J, Kim SK, Kim YK, et al. 2016; Proposal of new expanded selection criteria using total tumor size and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose - positron emission tomography/computed tomography for living donor liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: the National Cancer Center Korea criteria. World J Transplant. 6:411–422. DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i2.411. PMID: 27358787. PMCID: PMC4919746.
14. Lee SD, Kim SH, Kim YK, Kim C, Kim SK, Han SS, et al. 2013; (18)F-FDG-PET/CT predicts early tumor recurrence in living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Transpl Int. 26:50–60. DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2012.01572.x. PMID: 23106431.
15. Lee JH, Cho Y, Kim HY, Cho EJ, Lee DH, Yu SJ, et al. 2016; Serum tumor markers provide refined prognostication in selecting liver transplantation candidate for hepatocellular carcinoma patients beyond the Milan criteria. Ann Surg. 263:842–850. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001578. PMID: 26779979.
16. Yang K, Lee TB, Choi BH, Park YM, Ryu JH, Joo DJ, et al. 2016; Development and applicability of the A-P 200 criteria for liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Transplant Proc. 48:3317–3322. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.08.050. PMID: 27931576.
17. Lee HW, Song GW, Lee SG, Kim JM, Joh JW, Han DH, et al. 2018; Patient selection by tumor markers in liver transplantation for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transpl. 24:1243–1251. DOI: 10.1002/lt.25056. PMID: 29575509.
18. Kang YK, Choi JY, Paeng JC, Kim YI, Kwon HW, Cheon GJ, et al. 2019; Composite criteria using clinical and FDG PET/CT factors for predicting recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after living donor liver transplantation. Eur Radiol. 29:6009–6017. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06239-z. PMID: 31115626.
19. Kim SH, Moon DB, Park GC, Lee SG, Hwang S, Ahn CS, et al. 2021; Preoperative prediction score of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence in living donor liver transplantation: validation of SNAPP score developed at Asan Medical Center. Am J Transplant. 21:604–613. DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16227.
20. Hwang S, Song GW, Ahn CS, Kim KH, Moon DB, Ha TY, et al. 2021; Quantitative prognostic prediction using ADV score for hepatocellular carcinoma following living donor liver transplantation. J Gastrointest Surg. [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-021-04939-w.
21. Mazzaferro V, Sposito C, Zhou J, Pinna AD, De Carlis L, Fan J, et al. 2018; Metroticket 2.0 model for analysis of competing risks of death after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 154:128–139. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.09.025. PMID: 28989060.
22. Lee S, Hyuck David Kwon C, Man Kim J, Joh JW, Woon Paik S, Kim BW, et al. 2014; Time of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver resection and alpha-fetoprotein are important prognostic factors for salvage liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 20:1057–1063. DOI: 10.1002/lt.23919. PMID: 24862741.
23. Hwang S, Song GW, Ahn CS, Kim KH, Moon DB, Ha TY, et al. 2020; Salvage living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after hepatectomy: quantitative prediction using ADV score. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.863. PMID: 33175453.
24. Hwang S, Ahn CS, Kim KH, Moon DB, Ha TY, Song GW, et al. 2011; Super-selection of a subgroup of hepatocellular carcinoma patients at minimal risk of recurrence for liver transplantation. J Gastrointest Surg. 15:971–981. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-011-1467-0. PMID: 21547706.
25. Kang WH, Hwang S, Song GW, Lee YJ, Kim KH, Ahn CS, et al. 2017; Prognostic effect of transarterial chemoembolization-induced complete pathological response in patients undergoing liver resection and transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transpl. 23:781–790. DOI: 10.1002/lt.24752. PMID: 28240808.
26. Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R, Andreola S, Pulvirenti A, Bozzetti F, et al. 1996; Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 334:693–699. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199603143341104. PMID: 8594428.
27. Broelsch CE, Frilling A, Malago M. 2005; Should we expand the criteria for liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma--yes, of course! J Hepatol. 43:569–573. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.07.016. PMID: 16120470.
28. Hiatt JR, Carmody IC, Busuttil RW. 2005; Should we expand the criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma with living-donor liver transplantation?--no, never. J Hepatol. 43:573–577. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.07.017. PMID: 16112768.
29. Hwang S, Song GW, Lee YJ, Kim KH, Ahn CS, Moon DB, et al. 2016; Multiplication of tumor volume by two tumor markers is a post-resection prognostic predictor for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 20:1807–1820. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-016-3187-y. PMID: 27311982.
30. Toso C, Asthana S, Bigam DL, Shapiro AM, Kneteman NM. 2009; Reassessing selection criteria prior to liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma utilizing the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database. Hepatology. 49:832–838. DOI: 10.1002/hep.22693. PMID: 19152426.
31. Fujiki M, Takada Y, Ogura Y, Oike F, Kaido T, Teramukai S, et al. 2009; Significance of des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin in selection criteria for living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Transplant. 9:2362–2371. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02783.x. PMID: 19656125.
32. Shimamura T, Akamatsu N, Fujiyoshi M, Kawaguchi A, Morita S, Kawasaki S, et al. Japanese Liver Transplantation Society. 2019; Expanded living-donor liver transplantation criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma based on the Japanese nationwide survey: the 5-5-500 rule - a retrospective study. Transpl Int. 32:356–368. DOI: 10.1111/tri.13391. PMID: 30556935.
33. Lencioni R, Llovet JM. 2010; Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Liver Dis. 30:52–60. DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1247132. PMID: 20175033.
34. Galizia MS, Töre HG, Chalian H, Yaghmai V. 2011; Evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma size using two-dimensional and volumetric analysis: effect on liver transplantation eligibility. Acad Radiol. 18:1555–1560. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.08.011. PMID: 21962475.
35. Botea F, Marconi M, Lutman F, Balzarini L, Roncalli M, Montorsi M, et al. 2010; Radiological estimation of size in colorectal liver metastases: is it reliable? Comparison with post-resectional measurements. Updates Surg. 62:21–26. DOI: 10.1007/s13304-010-0004-0. PMID: 20845097.
36. Kim HD, Shim JH, Kim GA, Shin YM, Yu E, Lee SG, et al. 2015; Optimal methods for measuring eligibility for liver transplant in hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing transarterial chemoembolization. J Hepatol. 62:1076–1084. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.12.013. PMID: 25529626.
37. Yang SH, Suh KS, Lee HW, Cho EH, Cho JY, Cho YB, et al. 2006; The role of (18)F-FDG-PET imaging for the selection of liver transplantation candidates among hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Liver Transpl. 12:1655–1660. DOI: 10.1002/lt.20861. PMID: 16964589.
38. Lee JW, Paeng JC, Kang KW, Kwon HW, Suh KS, Chung JK, et al. 2009; Prediction of tumor recurrence by 18F-FDG PET in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 50:682–687. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.060574. PMID: 19372474.
39. Lin CY, Liao CW, Chu LY, Yen KY, Jeng LB, Hsu CN, et al. 2017; Predictive value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for vascular invasion in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation. Clin Nucl Med. 42:e183–e187. DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000001545. PMID: 28114226.
40. Mazzaferro V, Llovet JM, Miceli R, Bhoori S, Schiavo M, Mariani L, et al. Metroticket Investigator Study Group. 2009; Predicting survival after liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria: a retrospective, exploratory analysis. Lancet Oncol. 10:35–43. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70284-5.
41. Cho HD, Hwang S, Lee YJ, Park KM, Kim KH, Kim JC, et al. 2016; Changes in the types of liver diseases requiring hepatic resection: a single-institution experience of 9016 cases over a 10-year period. Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 20:49–52. DOI: 10.14701/kjhbps.2016.20.2.49. PMID: 27212990. PMCID: PMC4874044.
Full Text Links
  • ALT
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr