Ann Lab Med.  2024 Nov;44(6):472-477. 10.3343/alm.2024.0084.

Customized Quality Assessment of Healthcare Data

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, Konyang University, Daejeon, Korea
  • 2Konyang Medical Data Research group-KYMERA, Konyang University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
  • 3Healthcare Data Verification Center, Konyang University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
  • 4Department of Otorhinolaryngology– Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, Konyang University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea


Figure

  • Fig. 1 Three stages of quality management direction for customized healthcare data.


Reference

References

1. Hong L, Luo M, Wang R, Lu P, Lu W, Lu L. 2018; Big data in health care: applications and challenges. 2:175–97. DOI: 10.2478/dim-2018-0014.
2. Nikiforova A. 2020; Definition and evaluation of data quality: user-oriented data object-driven approach to data quality assessment. Balt J Mod Comput. 3:391–432. DOI: 10.22364/bjmc.2020.8.3.02.
3. Dasu T, Johnson T. Shewart WA, Wilks SS, editors. 2003. Data quality: techniques and algorithms. Exploratory data mining and data cleaning. John Wiley & Sons;New York: p. 139–88. DOI: 10.1002/0471448354.ch5.
4. Bernardi FA, Alves D, Crepaldi N, Yamada DB, Lima VC, Rijo R. 2023; Data quality in health research: integrative literature review. J Med Internet Res. 25:e41446. DOI: 10.2196/41446. PMID: 37906223. PMCID: PMC10646672. PMID: 559cc8a2d8ac424e8bbb7575a56326fc.
5. Kim J, Kim H, Son K, Song Y, Yoon J, Lim H, et al. 2014; Medical utilization of big data. Inf Sci Manag. 32:18–26. DOI: 10.3139/9783446441774.002.
6. WHO. 2003. Improving data quality: a guide for developing countries. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/206974.
7. National Information Society Agency (NIA). 2024. Big data platform and center data quality management guideline v3.1. https://aihub.or.kr/aihubnews/qlityguidance/view.do?pageIndex=1&nttSn=10269&currMenu=&topMenu=&searchCondition=&searchKeyword=.
8. Cho EJ, Jeong TD, Kim S, Park HD, Yun YM, Chun S, et al. 2023; A new strategy for evaluating the quality of laboratory results for big data research: using external quality assessment survey data (2010-2020). Ann Lab Med. 43:425–33. DOI: 10.3343/alm.2023.43.5.425. PMID: 37080743. PMCID: PMC10151270.
9. Kim S, Cho EJ, Jeong TD, Park HD, Yun YM, Lee K, et al. 2023; Proposed model for evaluating real-world laboratory results for big data research. Ann Lab Med. 43:104–7. DOI: 10.3343/alm.2023.43.1.104. PMID: 36045065. PMCID: PMC9467825.
10. Bae SH, Lim IH. 2012; A study on 3G networked pulse measurement system using optical sensor. J Kor Inst Electron Commun Sci. 7:1555–60.
11. Hinrichs H. 2002. Datenqualitätsmanagement in data warehouse-systemen. Doctoral dissertation. Universität Oldenburg;DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-56687-5_15.
12. Hwang P, Lee W, Ryu K, Jung W, Shim S, Kim JY, et al. Research for Data Quality Dimensions of Medical Data. In : 2023 Fall Academic Conference of the Korean Society of Medical Informatics; Nov 30, 2023; Gyeonggi-do, Korea. https://www.kosmi.org/bbs/download.php?bo_table=sub4_2&wr_id=86&no=4. Updated on Feb 2024. DOI: 10.1007/3-540-33173-5_2.
13. Lee JH, Shin J. 2024; AI performance based on learning-data labeling accuracy. J Ind Converg. 22:177–83. DOI: 10.22678/JIC.2024.22.1.177.
14. Moges HT, Dejaeger K, Lemahieu W, Baesens B. 2012; A multidimensional analysis of data quality for credit risk management: new insights and challenges. Inf Manag. 50:43–58. DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2012.10.001.
15. Keller S, Korkmaz G, Orr M, Schroeder A, Shipp S. 2017; The evolution of data quality: understanding the transdisciplinary origins of data quality concepts and approaches. Annu Rev Stat Appl. 4:85–108. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-statistics-060116-054114.
Full Text Links
  • ALM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr