Clin Endosc.  2024 Sep;57(5):581-587. 10.5946/ce.2024.001.

Painless colonoscopy: fact or fiction?

• Sinonquel P
• Jans A
• Bisschops R

• KMID: 2559206
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2024.001

Abstract

Although colonoscopy is a routinely performed procedure, it is not devoid of challenges, such as the potential for perforation and considerable patient discomfort, leading to patients postponing the procedure with several healthcare risks. This review delves into preprocedural and procedural solutions, and emerging technologies aimed at addressing the drawbacks of colonoscopies. Insufflation and sedation techniques, together with various other methods, have been explored to increase patient satisfaction, and thereby, the quality of endoscopy. Recent advances in this field include the prevention of loop formation, encompassing the use of variable-stiffness endoscopes, computer-guided scopes, magnetic endoscopic imaging, robotics, and capsule endoscopy. An autonomous endoscope that relies on self-propulsion to completely avoid looping is a potentially groundbreaking technology for the next generation of endoscopes. Nevertheless, critical techniques need to be refined to ensure the development of effective and efficient endoscopes.

Keyword

Colonoscopy; Endoscopy; Patient comfort

Reference

1. Morgan E, Arnold M, Gini A, et al. Global burden of colorectal cancer in 2020 and 2040: incidence and mortality estimates from GLOBOCAN. Gut. 2023; 72:338–344.

2. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68:394–424.

3. Flugelman AA, Stein N, Segol O, et al. Delayed colonoscopy following a positive fecal test result and cancer mortality. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2019; 3:pkz024.

4. Zorzi M, Battagello J, Selby K, et al. Non-compliance with colonoscopy after a positive faecal immunochemical test doubles the risk of dying from colorectal cancer. Gut. 2022; 71:561–567.

5. Gingold-Belfer R, Leibovitzh H, Boltin D, et al. The compliance rate for the second diagnostic evaluation after a positive fecal occult blood test: a systematic review and meta-analysis. United European Gastroenterol J. 2019; 7:424–448.

6. Mendivil J, Appierto M, Aceituno S, et al. Economic evaluations of screening strategies for the early detection of colorectal cancer in the average-risk population: a systematic literature review. PLoS One. 2019; 14:e0227251.

7. Mendivil J, Appierto M, Aceituno S, et al. Economic evaluations of screening strategies for the early detection of colorectal cancer in the average-risk population: a systematic literature review. PLoS One. 2019; 14:e0227251.

8. Anderson ML, Pasha TM, Leighton JA. Endoscopic perforation of the colon: lessons from a 10-year study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000; 95:3418–3422.

9. Newcomer MK, Brazer SR. Complications of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and their management. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1994; 4:551–570.

10. Patel S, Vargo JJ, Khandwala F, et al. Deep sedation occurs frequently during elective endoscopy with meperidine and midazolam. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005; 100:2689–2695.

11. Liu H, Waxman DA, Main R, et al. Utilization of anesthesia services during outpatient endoscopies and colonoscopies and associated spending in 2003-2009. JAMA. 2012; 307:1178–1184.

12. McQuaid KR, Laine L. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials of moderate sedation for routine endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67:910–923.

13. Wadhwa V, Issa D, Garg S, et al. Similar risk of cardiopulmonary adverse events between propofol and traditional anesthesia for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 15:194–206.

14. Wang D, Chen C, Chen J, et al. The use of propofol as a sedative agent in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e53311.

15. Zhan Y, Liang S, Yang Z, et al. Efficacy and safety of subanesthetic doses of esketamine combined with propofol in painless gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. BMC Gastroenterol. 2022; 22:391.

16. Carter HG. Explosion in the colon during electrodesiccation of polyps. Am J Surg. 1952; 84:514–517.

17. Hussein AM, Bartram CI, Williams CB. Carbon dioxide insufflation for more comfortable colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1984; 30:68–70.

18. Kaminski MF, Thomas-Gibson S, Bugajski M, et al. Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy. 2017; 49:378–397.

19. Janssens F, Deviere J, Eisendrath P, et al. Carbon dioxide for gut distension during digestive endoscopy: technique and practice survey. World J Gastroenterol. 2009; 15:1475–1479.

20. Bretthauer M, Kalager M, Adami HO, et al. Who is for CO2?: slow adoption of carbon dioxide insufflation in colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med. 2016; 165:145–146.

21. Rogers AC, Van De Hoef D, Sahebally SM, et al. A meta-analysis of carbon dioxide versus room air insufflation on patient comfort and key performance indicators at colonoscopy. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020; 35:455–464.

22. Bassan MS, Holt B, Moss A, et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation reduces number of postprocedure admissions after endoscopic resection of large colonic lesions: a prospective cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013; 77:90–95.

23. Hilzenrat N, Fich A, Odes HS, et al. Does insertion of a rectal tube after colonoscopy reduce patient discomfort and improve satisfaction? Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 57:54–57.

24. East JE, Bassett P, Arebi N, et al. Dynamic patient position changes during colonoscope withdrawal increase adenoma detection: a randomized, crossover trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73:456–463.

25. Vergis N, McGrath AK, Stoddart CH, et al. Right or left in colonoscopy (ROLCOL)?: a randomized controlled trial of right- versus left-sided starting position in colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015; 110:1576–1581.

26. Yoshikawa I, Honda H, Nagata K, et al. Variable stiffness colonoscopes are associated with less pain during colonoscopy in unsedated patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002; 97:3052–3055.

27. Othman MO, Bradley AG, Choudhary A, et al. Variable stiffness colonoscope versus regular adult colonoscope: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endoscopy. 2009; 41:17–24.

28. Peter S, Reddy NB, Naseemuddin M, et al. Outcomes of use of electromagnetic guidance with responsive insertion technology (RIT) during colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Endosc Int Open. 2019; 7:E225–E231.

29. Shah SG, Saunders BP, Brooker JC, et al. Magnetic imaging of colonoscopy: an audit of looping, accuracy and ancillary maneuvers. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000; 52:1–8.

30. Repici A, Spadaccini M, Vespa E, et al. Endorail add-on device for solving colon loops: proof of concept in a phantom colon. Endoscopy. 2022; 54:S171–S172.

31. Leung FW, Amato A, Ell C, et al. Water-aided colonoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 76:657–666.

32. Hsieh YH, Koo M, Leung FW. A patient-blinded randomized, controlled trial comparing air insufflation, water immersion, and water exchange during minimally sedated colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014; 109:1390–1400.

33. Leung FW, Harker JO, Jackson G, et al. A proof-of-principle, prospective, randomized, controlled trial demonstrating improved outcomes in scheduled unsedated colonoscopy by the water method. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 72:693–700.

34. Jiao TX, Hu Y, Guo SB. Clinical value of sigmoid colon water exchange colonoscopy: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Sci Rep. 2023; 13:13704.

35. Leung F. Insights into water exchange colonoscopy. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2022; 18:664–666.

36. Trecca A, Catalano F, Bella A, et al. Robotic colonoscopy: efficacy, tolerability and safety: preliminary clinical results from a pilot study. Surg Endosc. 2020; 34:1442–1450.

37. Kim HG. Painless colonoscopy: available techniques and instruments. Clin Endosc. 2016; 49:444–448.

38. Cosentino F, Tumino E, Passoni GR, et al. Functional evaluation of the endotics system, a new disposable self-propelled robotic colonoscope: in vitro tests and clinical trial. Int J Artif Organs. 2009; 32:517–527.

39. Eickhoff A, van Dam J, Jakobs R, et al. Computer-assisted colonoscopy (the NeoGuide Endoscopy System): results of the first human clinical trial (“PACE study”). Am J Gastroenterol. 2007; 102:261–266.

40. Rösch T, Adler A, Pohl H, et al. A motor-driven single-use colonoscope controlled with a hand-held device: a feasibility study in volunteers. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67:1139–1146.

41. Vucelic B, Rex D, Pulanic R, et al. The aer-o-scope: proof of concept of a pneumatic, skill-independent, self-propelling, self-navigating colonoscope. Gastroenterology. 2006; 130:672–677.

42. Shike M, Fireman Z, Eliakim R, et al. Sightline ColonoSight system for a disposable, power-assisted, non-fiber-optic colonoscopy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 68:701–710.

43. Tumino E, Parisi G, Bertoni M, et al. Use of robotic colonoscopy in patients with previous incomplete colonoscopy. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017; 21:819–826.

44. Tumino E, Sacco R, Bertini M, et al. Endotics system vs colonoscopy for the detection of polyps. World J Gastroenterol. 2010; 16:5452–5456.

45. Fernández-Landa MJ, Aginagalde AH, Arana-Arri E, et al. Quality indicators and patient satisfaction in colonoscopy. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 42:73–81.