J Korean Soc Emerg Med.  2024 Aug;35(4):321-329.

Comparison of emergency department utilization between the emergency medical center and local emergency medical agency for patients with a critical illness code

• Hong J
• Ko E
• Pak YS
• Jeong J
• Chae B
• Kim WY

Abstract

Objective
Emergency medical system reform is an important part of the 4th Emergency Medical Care 5-year plan in Korea, published in 2023. However, little is known about the current emergency department (ED) utilization status of local emergency medical agencies (EMAs). We sought to compare the ED utilization code between the emergency medical centers (EMCs) (n=58) and the local EMAs (n=152) based on parameters such as the admission rate or transfer rate in patients with a critical illness.
Methods
Consecutive emergency patients registered on the National Emergency Department Information System from January 2022 to December 2022 were included in this study and their records were analyzed. The study included critically ill patients who were defined as having a critical illness code.
Results
Among 590,878 (EMC of 450,007; local EMA of 140,871) critical illness code patients, the admission rate was 76.2% for EMCs and 52.9% for local EMAs. Of the critical illness code patients who visited local EMAs, 89.4% were Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS) grade 3-5 patients. The hospitalization volume of critical illness code patients in the local EMAs was 74,571, mostly major trauma (47.5%) and ischemic stroke (11.5%). If KTAS grade 1 or 2 patients could not be transferred to the local EMAs, the EMCs covered up to 14,989 ED patients and 74,571 admitted patients additionally.
Conclusion
If the local EMAs maintain their current roles in the areas of major trauma and ischemic stroke, and take charge of the admission of patients with critical illness codes transferred from the EMC after emergency treatment, then the local EMAs can still maintain their functions even after the proposed emergency medical system reform.

Keyword

Emergency medicine; Emergency service; Hospitals; Critical illness