Nucl Med Mol Imaging.  2024 Aug;58(4):246-254. 10.1007/s13139-024-00861-6.

Clinical Performance Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence‑Powered Amyloid Brain PET Quantification Method

Affiliations
  • 1Brightonix Imaging Inc., Seoul, Korea
  • 2Institute of Radiation Medicine, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 3Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Chosun University and Chosun University Hospital, 365 Pilmun‑Daero, Dong‑Gu, Gwangju, South Korea
  • 4Interdisciplinary Program of Bioengineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
  • 5Artificial Intelligence Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
  • 6Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak‑Ro, Jongno‑Gu, Seoul 03080, Korea
  • 7Department of Nuclear Medicine, College of Medicine, Chosun University and Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea

Abstract

Abstract Purpose This study assesses the clinical performance of BTXBrain-Amyloid, an artificial intelligence-powered software for quantifying amyloid uptake in brain PET images.
Methods
150 amyloid brain PET images were visually assessed by experts and categorized as negative and positive. Standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) was calculated with cerebellum grey matter as the reference region, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and precision-recall (PR) analysis for BTXBrain-Amyloid were conducted. For comparison, same image processing and analysis was performed using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) program. In addition, to evaluate the spatial normalization (SN) performance, mutual information (MI) between MRI template and spatially normalized PET images was calculated and SPM group analysis was conducted.
Results
Both BTXBrain and SPM methods discriminated between negative and positive groups. However, BTXBrain exhibited lower SUVR standard deviation (0.06 and 0.21 for negative and positive, respectively) than SPM method (0.11 and 0.25). In ROC analysis, BTXBrain had an AUC of 0.979, compared to 0.959 for SPM, while PR curves showed an AUC of 0.983 for BTXBrain and 0.949 for SPM. At the optimal cut-off, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.983 and 0.921 for BTXBrain and 0.917 and 0.921 for SPM12, respectively. MI evaluation also favored BTXBrain (0.848 vs. 0.823), indicating improved SN. In SPM group analysis, BTXBrain exhibited higher sensitivity in detecting basal ganglia differences between negative and positive groups.
Conclusion
BTXBrain-Amyloid outperformed SPM in clinical performance evaluation, also demonstrating superior SN and improved detection of deep brain differences. These results suggest the potential of BTXBrain-Amyloid as a valuable tool for clinical amyloid PET image evaluation.

Keyword

Amyloid; Alzheimer dementia; Spatial normalization; Deep learning; Quantification
Full Text Links
  • NMMI
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr