Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.  2024 Aug;28(3):344-349. 10.14701/ahbps.24-034.

Feasibility, safety and effectiveness of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients undergoing liver resection

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India
  • 2Department of General Surgery, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India
  • 3Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India

Abstract

Backgrounds/Aims
The implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols has demonstrated significant advantages for patients by mitigating surgical stress and expediting recovery across a spectrum of surgical procedures worldwide. This investigation seeks to assess the effectiveness of the ERAS protocol specifically in the context of major liver resections within our geographical region.
Methods
Our department conducted retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data, gathered from consenting individuals who underwent liver resections from January 2018 to December 2023. The assessment encompassed baseline characteristics, preoperative indications, surgical outcomes, and postoperative complications among patients undergoing liver surgery.
Results
Among the included 184 patients (73 standard care, 111 ERAS program), the baseline characteristics were similar. Median postoperative hospital stay differed significantly: 5 days (range: 3–13 days) in ERAS, and 11 days (range: 6–22 days) in standard care (p < 0.001). Prophylactic abdominal drainage was less in ERAS (54.9%) than in standard care (86.3%, p < 0.001). Notably, in ERAS, 88.2% initiated enteral feeding orally on postoperative day 1, significantly higher than in standard care (47.9%, p < 0.001). Early postoperative mobilization was more common in ERAS (84.6%) than in standard care (36.9%, p < 0.001). Overall complication rates were 21.9% in standard care, and 8.1% in ERAS (p = 0.004).
Conclusions
Our investigation highlights the merits of ERAS protocol; adherence to its diverse components results in significant reduction in hospital length of stay, and reduced occurrence of postoperative complications, improving short-term recovery post liver resection

Keyword

Enhanced recovery after surgery; Postoperative complications; Hepatectomy

Reference

References

1. Basse L, Hjort Jakobsen D, Billesbølle P, Werner M, Kehlet H. 2000; A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg. 232:51–57. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200007000-00008. PMID: 10862195. PMCID: PMC1421107.
2. Moor D, Aggarwal G, Quiney N. 2017; Systemic response to surgery. Surgery (Oxf). 35:220–223. DOI: 10.1016/j.mpsur.2017.01.013.
3. Giannoudis PV, Dinopoulos H, Chalidis B, Hall GM. 2006; Surgical stress response. Injury. 37 Suppl 5:S3–S9. Erratum in: Injury 2007;38: 1224. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-1383(07)70005-0. PMID: 17338909.
4. Damania R, Cocieru A. 2017; Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols on postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing routine hepatectomy: review of the current evidence. Ann Transl Med. 5:341. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2017.07.04. PMID: 28936435. PMCID: PMC5599294.
5. van Dam RM, Hendry PO, Coolsen MM, Bemelmans MH, Lassen K, Revhaug A, et al. 2008; Initial experience with a multimodal enhanced recovery programme in patients undergoing liver resection. Br J Surg. 95:969–975. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6227. PMID: 18618897.
6. Ripollés-Melchor J, Abad-Motos A, Díez-Remesal Y, Aseguinolaza-Pagola M, Padin-Barreiro L, Sánchez-Martín R, et al. 2020; Association between use of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and postoperative complications in total hip and knee arthroplasty in the postoperative outcomes within enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in elective total hip and knee arthroplasty study (POWER2). JAMA Surg. 155:e196024. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.6024. PMID: 32049352. PMCID: PMC7042927.
7. Koea JB, Young Y, Gunn K. 2009; Fast track liver resection: the effect of a comprehensive care package and analgesia with single dose intrathecal morphine with gabapentin or continuous epidural analgesia. HPB Surg. 2009:271986. DOI: 10.1155/2009/271986. PMID: 20029637. PMCID: PMC2796218.
8. He F, Lin X, Xie F, Huang Y, Yuan R. 2015; The effect of enhanced recovery program for patients undergoing partial laparoscopic hepatectomy of liver cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. 17:694–701. DOI: 10.1007/s12094-015-1296-9. PMID: 25997686.
9. Zhou J, He X, Wang M, Zhao Y, Zhang N, Wang L, et al. 2021; Enhanced recovery after surgery in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy. Front Surg. 8:764887. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.764887. PMID: 34881286. PMCID: PMC8645578.
10. Yang R, Tao W, Chen YY, Zhang BH, Tang JM, Zhong S, et al. 2016; Enhanced recovery after surgery programs versus traditional perioperative care in laparoscopic hepatectomy: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 36(Pt A):274–282. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.11.017. PMID: 27840308.
11. Page AJ, Gani F, Crowley KT, Lee KH, Grant MC, Zavadsky TL, et al. 2016; Patient outcomes and provider perceptions following implementation of a standardized perioperative care pathway for open liver resection. Br J Surg. 103:564–571. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10087. PMID: 26859713.
12. Ni CY, Wang ZH, Huang ZP, Zhou H, Fu LJ, Cai H, et al. 2018; Early enforced mobilization after liver resection: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg. 54(Pt A):254–258. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.060. PMID: 29753000.
13. Lewis SJ, Egger M, Sylvester PA, Thomas S. 2001; Early enteral feeding versus "nil by mouth" after gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. BMJ. 323:773–776. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.323.7316.773. PMID: 11588077. PMCID: PMC57351.
14. Savikko J, Ilmakunnas M, Mäkisalo H, Nordin A, Isoniemi H. 2015; Enhanced recovery protocol after liver resection. Br J Surg. 102:1526–1532. Erratum in: Br J Surg 2016;103:617. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9912. PMID: 26331595.
15. Li L, Chen J, Liu Z, Li Q, Shi Y. 2017; Enhanced recovery program versus traditional care after hepatectomy: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 96:e8052. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008052. PMID: 28930840. PMCID: PMC5617707.
16. Huang H, Zhou P, Li J, Luo H, Yu L. 2023; Enhanced recovery after surgery in primary liver cancer patients undergoing hepatectomy: experience from a large tertiary hospital in China. BMC Surg. 23:185. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02040-4. PMID: 37386393. PMCID: PMC10311806.
Full Text Links
  • AHBPS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr