Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.  2024 Aug;28(3):381-387. 10.14701/ahbps.24-056.

Comparative study of ambulatory versus inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Thailand: Assessing effectiveness and safety with a propensity score matched analysis

Affiliations
  • 1School of Surgery, Institute of Medicine, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
  • 2Department of Surgery, Suranaree University of Technology Hospital, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
  • 3School of Anesthesiology, Institute of Medicine, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
  • 4School of Radiology, Institute of Medicine, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand

Abstract

Backgrounds/Aims
Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is increasingly recognized for its advantages over the inpatient approach, which advantages include cost-effectiveness and faster recovery. However, its acceptance is limited by patient concerns regarding safety, and the potential for postoperative complications. The study aims to compare the operative and postoperative outcomes of ambulatory LC versus inpatient LC, specifically addressing patient hesitations related to early discharge.
Methods
In a retrospective analysis, patients who underwent LC were divided into ambulatory or inpatient groups based on American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, age, and the availability of postoperative care. Propensity score matching was utilized to ensure comparability between the groups. Data collection focused on demographic information, perioperative data, and postoperative follow-up results to identify the safety of both approaches.
Results
The study included a cohort of 220 patients undergoing LC, of which 48 in each group matched post-propensity score matching. The matched analysis indicated that ambulatory LC patients seem to experience shorter operative times and reduced blood loss, but these differences were not statistically significant (35 minutes vs. 46 minutes, p-value = 0.18; and 8.5 mL vs. 23 mL, p-value = 0.14, respectively). There were no significant differences in complication rates or readmission frequencies, compared to the inpatient cohort.
Conclusions
Ambulatory LC does not compromise safety or efficacy, compared to traditional inpatient procedures. The findings suggest that ambulatory LC could be more widely adopted, with appropriate patient education and selection criteria, to alleviate concerns and increase patient acceptance.

Keyword

Cholecystectomy; laparoscopic; Gallstones; Ambulatory surgical procedures; Gallbladder diseases

Reference

References

1. Stinton LM, Shaffer EA. 2012; Epidemiology of gallbladder disease: cholelithiasis and cancer. Gut Liver. 6:172–187. DOI: 10.5009/gnl.2012.6.2.172. PMID: 22570746. PMCID: PMC3343155.
2. Keeratibharat N. 2021; Initial experience of intraoperative fluorescent cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 68:102569. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102569. PMID: 34345426. PMCID: PMC8319025.
3. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Johnson CL. 2002; Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2000. JAMA. 288:1723–1727. DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1723. PMID: 12365955.
4. Tandon A, Sunderland G, Nunes QM, Misra N, Shrotri M. 2016; Day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with high BMI: experience from a UK centre. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 98:329–333. DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0125. PMID: 27087326. PMCID: PMC5227041.
5. Tian WM, Chang D, Pressley M, Muhammed M, Fong P, Webster W, et al. 2023; Development of a prospective biliary dashboard to compare performance and surgical cost. Surg Endosc. 37:8829–8840. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10376-4. PMID: 37626234.
6. MingJun H, Yan D, JiPing L, HongSheng M. 2021; Thirty-day unplanned readmission after ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy in western China: a retrospective study. Cureus. 13:e13932. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.13932. PMID: 33868863. PMCID: PMC8049883.
7. Kim JY, Lee BD, Kim GS, Park SH, Kim YI. 2013; Day surgery in Korea, a single center experience for 15 years. Korean J Anesthesiol. 65(6 Suppl):S101–S102. DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2013.65.6S.S101. PMID: 24478830. PMCID: PMC3903818.
8. Balciscueta I, Barberà F, Lorenzo J, Martínez S, Sebastián M, Balciscueta Z. 2021; Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of predictors of failure. Surgery. 170:373–382. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.12.029. PMID: 33558068.
9. Rosero EB, Joshi GP. 2017; Hospital readmission after ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: incidence and predictors. J Surg Res. 219:108–115. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.071. PMID: 29078868.
10. Lord AC, Hicks G, Pearce B, Tanno L, Pucher PH. 2019; Safety and outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the extremely elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Chir Belg. 119:349–356. DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2019.1658356. PMID: 31437407.
11. Agha R, Abdall-Razak A, Crossley E, Dowlut N, Iosifidis C, Mathew G. 2019; STROCSS 2019 guideline: strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery. Int J Surg. 72:156–165. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.002. PMID: 31704426.
12. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. 2009; The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 250:187–196. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2. PMID: 19638912.
13. Wongyingsinn M, Wittayapairoj A, Thienthong S, Ratanasuwan P, Charoenraj P, Bunchungmongkol N, et al. 2021; [Pre-anesthesia clinic guideline for one day surgery and minimally invasive surgery by the Royal College of Anesthesiologists of Thailand]. Thai J Anesthesiol. 47:388–394. Thai.
14. Palumbo P, Tellan G, Perotti B, Pacilè MA, Vietri F, Illuminati G. 2013; Modified PADSS (Post Anaesthetic Discharge Scoring System) for monitoring outpatients discharge. Ann Ital Chir. 84:661–665.
15. Manzia TM, Quaranta C, Filingeri V, Toti L, Anselmo A, Tariciotti L, et al. 2020; Feasibility and cost effectiveness of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A retrospective cohort study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 55:56–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.04.036. PMID: 32461804. PMCID: PMC7240280.
16. Picard L, Duceau B, Cambriel A, Voron T, Makoudi S, Tsai AS, et al. 2022; Risk factors for prolonged time to hospital discharge after ambulatory cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia. A retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 104:106706. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106706. PMID: 35697325.
17. Aubrun F, Ecoffey C, Benhamou D, Jouffroy L, Diemunsch P, Skaare K, et al. 2019; Perioperative pain and post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) management after day-case surgery: the SFAR-OPERA national study. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 38:223–229. DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2018.08.004. PMID: 30339892.
18. Weibel S, Rücker G, Eberhart LH, Pace NL, Hartl HM, Jordan OL, et al. 2020; Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 10:CD012859. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2. PMID: 33075160. PMCID: PMC8094506.
19. Awad K, Ahmed H, Abushouk AI, Al Nahrawi S, Elsherbeny MY, Mustafa SM, et al. 2016; Dexamethasone combined with other antiemetics versus single antiemetics for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 36(Pt A):152–163. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.10.034. PMID: 27793640.
20. Loizides S, Gurusamy KS, Nagendran M, Rossi M, Guerrini GP, Davidson BR. Wound infiltration with local anaesthetic agents for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (3):CD007049. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007049.pub2. PMID: 24619479. PMCID: PMC11252723.
21. Sarakatsianou C, Perivoliotis K, Baloyiannis I, Georgopoulou S, Tsiaka A, Tzovaras G. 2023; Efficacy of intraoperative intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative opioid consumption after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 408:197. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02937-x. PMID: 37198418. PMCID: PMC10191684.
22. Toleska M, Dimitrovski A, Dimitrovska NT. 2022; Postoperative nausea and vomiting in opioid-free anesthesia versus opioid based anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 43:101–108. DOI: 10.2478/prilozi-2022-0042. PMID: 36473040.
23. Hao C, Xu H, Du J, Zhang T, Zhang X, Zhao Z, et al. 2023; Impact of opioid-free anesthesia on postoperative quality of recovery in patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy-a randomized controlled trial. Drug Des Devel Ther. 17:3539–3547. DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S439674. PMID: 38046284. PMCID: PMC10693280.
24. Wu Q, Fu N, Chen W, Jin X, He L, Mo C, et al. 2022; Risk factors for patient selection in ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single-centre experience. J Minim Access Surg. 18:302–307. DOI: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_25_21. PMID: 35313439. PMCID: PMC8973494.
25. Rupp S, Ahrens E, Rudolph MI, Azimaraghi O, Schaefer MS, Fassbender P, et al. 2023; Development and validation of an instrument to predict prolonged length of stay in the postanesthesia care unit following ambulatory surgery. Can J Anaesth. 70:1939–1949. DOI: 10.1007/s12630-023-02604-1. PMID: 37957439.
26. Subirana Magdaleno H, Caro Tarragó A, Olona Casas C, Díaz Padillo A, Franco Chacón M, Vadillo Bargalló J, et al. 2018; Evaluation of the impact of preoperative education in ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective, double-blind randomized trial. Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 96:88–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2017.10.002. PMID: 29224843.
Full Text Links
  • AHBPS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr