J Korean Med Sci.  2024 Aug;39(30):e215. 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e215.

Coercion Authorship: Ubiquitous and Preventable

• Rivera H

• KMID: 2558517
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e215

Abstract

Coercion authorship (CA), typically enforced by principal investigators, has detrimental effects on graduate students, young researchers, and the entire scientific endeavor. Although CA is ubiquitous, its occurrence and major determinants have been mainly explored among graduate students and junior scientists in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark where the ratio of CA ranged from 13 to 40%. In addition to lacking comparable figures, developing countries usually lack institutional plans for promoting integrity and effective deterrents against CA and other malpractices. Hence, universities and research centers therein must publish their authorship policies and implement specific strategies to instruct graduate students, junior scientists, and experienced researchers on integrity, publishing ethics, and responsible authorship. Finally, I remark that the primary responsibility of principal researchers to promote fair authorship practices and discourage unfair ones is even greater when it comes to CA due to the asymmetrical power relationship between senior authors and novice scientists.

Keyword

Inappropriate Authorship; Coercion Authorship; Coercive Authorship; Graduate Students; Senior Scientists; Principal Investigators

Reference

1. Rennie D, Flanagin A. Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin. JAMA. 1994; 271(6):469–471. PMID: 8295324.

2. Misra DP, Ravindran V, Agarwal V. Integrity of authorship and peer review practices: challenges and opportunities for improvement. J Korean Med Sci. 2018; 33(46):e287. PMID: 30416407.

3. Meursinge Reynders RA, Ter Riet G, Di Girolamo N, Cavagnetto D, Malički M. Honorary authorship is highly prevalent in health sciences: systematic review and meta-analysis of surveys. Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):4385. PMID: 38388672.

4. Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Kitas GD. Authorship problems in scholarly journals: considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors. Rheumatol Int. 2013; 33(2):277–284. PMID: 23124697.

5. Zimba O, Gasparyan AY. Scientific authorship: a primer for researchers. Reumatologia. 2020; 58(6):345–349. PMID: 33456076.

6. Khezr P, Mohan V. The vexing but persistent problem of authorship misconduct in research. Res Policy. 2022; 51(3):104466.

7. Pękacka-Falkowska K, Raj D, Węglorz J. Analysis of the ethical issues in authorship of collaborative research. Observations inspired by the historical case study of Gerard L. Blaes' (Blasius) claim to sole authorship of ‘Anatome medullae spinalis’. Anat Sci Educ. 2024; DOI: 10.1002/ase.2435. Forthcoming.

8. Slone RM. Coauthors' contributions to major papers published in the AJR: frequency of undeserved coauthorship. Am J Roentgenol. 1996; 167(3):571–579. PMID: 8751654.

9. Bennett DM, Taylor DM. Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers. Emerg Med (Fremantle). 2003; 15(3):263–270. PMID: 12786648.

10. Wagena EJ. The scandal of unfair behaviour of senior faculty. J Med Ethics. 2005; 31(5):308. PMID: 15863695.

11. Rohwer A, Young T, Wager E, Garner P. Authorship, plagiarism and conflict of interest: views and practices from low/middle-income country health researchers. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(11):e018467.

12. Ávila M. Bullying in authorship: abusive mentorship and undeserved credit. Medwave. 2014; 14(4):e5950. PMID: 25383765.

13. Beshyah SA, Abdelmanna DK, Elzouki AN, Elkhammas EA. Authorship disputes: do they result from inadvertent errors of judgment or intentional unethical misconduct? Ibnosina J Med Biomed Sci. 2018; 10(5):158–164.

14. Hofmann B, Thoresen M, Holm S. Research integrity attitudes and behaviors are difficult to alter: results from a ten year follow-up study in Norway. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2023; 18(1-2):50–57. PMID: 36604861.

15. Nylenna M, Fagerbakk F, Kierulf P. Authorship: attitudes and practice among Norwegian researchers. BMC Med Ethics. 2014; 15:53. PMID: 24989359.

16. Goddiksen MP, Johansen MW, Armond AC, Clavien C, Hogan L, Kovács N, et al. “The person in power told me to”—European PhD students’ perspectives on guest authorship and good authorship practice. PLoS One. 2023; 18(1):e0280018. PMID: 36634045.

17. Satalkar P, Perneger T, Shaw D. Accommodating an uninvited guest: perspectives of researchers in Switzerland on 'honorary' authorship. Sci Eng Ethics. 2020; 26(2):947–967. PMID: 31784940.

18. O'Brien J, Baerlocher MO, Newton M, Gautam T, Noble J. Honorary coauthorship: does it matter? Can Assoc Radiol J. 2009; 60(5):231–236. PMID: 19819102.

19. Ljubenković AM, Borovečki A, Ćurković M, Hofmann B, Holm S. Survey on the research misconduct and questionable research practices of medical students, PhD students, and supervisors at the Zagreb School of Medicine in Croatia. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2021; 16(4):435–449. PMID: 34310249.

20. Zhaksylyk A, Zimba O, Yessirkepov M, Kocyigit BF. Research integrity: where we are and where we are heading. J Korean Med Sci. 2023; 38(47):e405. PMID: 38050915.

21. Ilarraza-Lomelí H, García-Saldivia M. En un documento científico: ¿quién debe ser el primer autor? [In a scientific paper: who should be the first author?]. Arch Cardiol Mex. 2015; 85(2):93–95. Spanish. PMID: 26022294.

22. Rivera H. Fake peer review and inappropriate authorship are real evils. J Korean Med Sci. 2019; 34(2):e6. PMID: 30636943.

23. Rivera H. Authorship malpractices in developing countries. Cent Asian J Med Hypotheses Ethics. 2020; 1(1):69–74.

24. Kocyigit BF, Zhaksylyk A, Akyol A, Yessirkepov M. Characteristics of retracted publications from Kazakhstan: an analysis using the Retraction Watch Database. J Korean Med Sci. 2023; 38(46):e390. PMID: 38013646.

25. Teixeira da Silva JA. The abuse of authorship in the biomedical literature. Cent Asian J Med Hypotheses Ethics. 2023; 4(2):123–126.

26. Hong ST. Unjustified authorship should not be tolerated. J Korean Med Sci. 2019; 34(45):e310. PMID: 31760715.

27. Shah A, Rajasekaran S, Bhat A, Solomon JM. Frequency and factors associated with honorary authorship in Indian biomedical journals: Analysis of papers published from 2012 to 2013. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018; 13(2):187–195. PMID: 29345178.

28. Escada P, Donato H, Villanueva T. Promoting ethical integrity in authorship attribution: who can help more? Acta Med Port. 2023; 36(6):381–382. PMID: 37145325.

29. Chen S, Macfarlane B. Academic integrity in China. Bretag T, editor. Hanbook of Academic Integrity. Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media Singapore;2016. p. 99–106.

30. Smith E, Master Z. Best practice to order authors in multi/interdisciplinary health sciences research publications. Account Res. 2017; 24(4):243–267. PMID: 28128975.

31. Aliukonis V, Poškutė M, Gefenas E. Perish or publish dilemma: challenges to responsible authorship. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020; 56(3):123. PMID: 32178434.

32. Forsberg EM, Anthun FO, Bailey S, Birchley G, Bout H, Casonato C, et al. Working with research integrity-Guidance for research performing organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER statement. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018; 24(4):1023–1034. PMID: 29855866.

33. Armond ACV, Kakuk P. Research integrity guidelines and safeguards in Brazil. Account Res. 2023; 30(3):133–149. PMID: 34530667.

34. Gasparyan AY. Authorship and contributorship in scholarly journals. J Korean Med Sci. 2013; 28(6):801–802. PMID: 23772140.

35. Mavrogenis AF, Scarlat MM. Writing for "International Orthopaedics": authorship, fraud, and ethical concerns. Int Orthop. 2021; 45(10):2461–2464. PMID: 34625825.