J Korean Soc Radiol.  2024 Jul;85(4):754-768. 10.3348/jksr.2023.0104.

Clinical and MR Predictors of Retro-Odontoid Pseudotumor Regression Following Posterior Fixation in Patients with Atlantoaxial Instability

• Kim J
• Kim Y
• Lee E
• Lee JW

• KMID: 2558418
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2023.0104

Abstract

Purpose
To identify clinical and MR predictors of retro-odontoid pseudotumor (ROP) regression after posterior fixation in patients with atlantoaxial instability.
Materials and Methods
We included patients who had undergone posterior fixation for atlantoaxial instability and preoperative and postoperative MR imaging. Patients were classified into two groups according to the degree of ROP regression after posterior fixation: regression (≥ 10% reduction) and no regression (< 10% reduction). Mann–Whitney and Fisher’s exact tests were performed to identify the clinical (age and sex) and MR predictors (preoperative ROP thickness, ROP type, MR signal homogeneity of the ROP, spinal cord signal change, spinal cord atrophy, ossified posterior longitudinal ligament, os odontoideum, and atlantodental interval) associated with ROP regression.
Results
We retrospectively assessed 11 consecutive patients (7 female; median age, 66 years [range, 31–84 years]). Posterior fixation induced ROP regression in eight (72.7%) patients. Older age and greater preoperative ROP thickness significantly correlated with ROP regression (p = 0.024 and 0.012, respectively). All patients with preoperative ROP thickness > 5 mm exhibited ROP regression. The other variables were not significantly associated with ROP regression.
Conclusion
Older age and thicker preoperative ROP are associated with ROP regression after posterior fixation in patients with atlantoaxial instability.

Keyword

Retro-Odontoid Pseudotumor; Atlantoaxial Instability; Magnetic Resonance Imaging