Clin Orthop Surg.  2024 Aug;16(4):636-640. 10.4055/cios24003.

Midterm Results after Tibiotalar or Tibiotalocalcaneal Fusion Using an Ilizarov External Fixator

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Armed Forces Yangju Hospital, Yangju, Korea
  • 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sree Narayana Institute of Medical Sciences, Ernakulam, India
  • 3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ernakulam Medical Centre, Kochi, India
  • 4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hallym University Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Chuncheon, Korea

Abstract

Background
Ankle fusion is considered a treatment of choice for end-stage ankle arthritis when a total ankle replacement procedure is not indicated. However, the potential risk of secondary arthritis in the adjacent joint after ankle fusion raises arguments on whether preserving the adjacent joint during an isolated tibiotalar (TT) fusion brings about any future benefits with regard to pain and gait discomfort. In this study, we intended to present midterm results following TT or tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) fusion using an Ilizarov external fixator and to investigate whether spontaneous fusion occurred in the subtalar or midtarsal joint.
Methods
This is a retrospective observational study. Medical records of patients who underwent TT or TTC fusion using an Ilizarov external fixator for substantial bone defects around the ankle joint between 1994 and 2018 were manually searched. Fortyone patients were included and the status of the joints adjacent to the fusion site was evaluated in radiographic examinations.
Results
Of the 34 patients who underwent TT fusion, 30 patients (88.3%) had a spontaneous fusion in the adjacent joints. Specifically, 11 patients (29.4%) had subtalar joint fusion and 19 patients (55.9%) had both midtarsal joint and subtalar joint fusion. In TTC fusion, the midtarsal joint was spontaneously fused in all 7 patients.
Conclusions
In this study, we observed spontaneous adjacent joint fusion following TT or TTC fusion using an Ilizarov external fixator for substantial bone defects around the ankle joint. Although a careful approach should be made since patients treated in this study may not represent typical candidates that need primary joint-sacrificing procedures, we believe that this study may draw attention from surgeons concerned about the fate of the adjacent joint status after TT or TTC fusion.

Keyword

Ankle; Arthritis; Arthrodesis
Full Text Links
  • CIOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr