Womens Health Nurs.  2024 Jun;30(2):140-152. 10.4069/whn.2024.06.12.

Postnatal social support experiences in primiparous women in Korea: a phenomenological study

• Lee E
• Hong K

• KMID: 2557361
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4069/whn.2024.06.12

Abstract

Purpose
Social support is essential for postpartum well-being, but little is known about the postpnatal social support preferred by primiparous women. This study aimed to comprehensively understand and describe the meaning of postnatal social support experience in primiparous women.
Methods
The participants were seven primiparous women who were within 1 year after childbirth, recruited through purposive and snowball sampling from an online parenting community. The data were collected through in-depth interviews from November 14 to 28, 2022. Participants were interviewed face-to-face or via phone or online platform, according to their choice. Colaizzi’s phenomenological qualitative research method was applied to analyze the meaning of the participants’ experience.
Results
Five theme clusters and fourteen themes were identified from the data. The five theme clusters are as follows: (1) Shortcomings of the childbirth and postpartum care system I learned through my experience; (2) Government policies focusing on childbirth and child-rearing rather than postpartum recovery; (3) Driving force of postpartum recovery: Shared childbirth process; (4) Childcare on my own; and (5) Conflicted between being a stay-at-home mom and a working mom under inadequate maternity protection policies.
Conclusion
Despite postpartum support from the government that was perceived as inadequate, first-time mothers regained confidence and motivation for parenting with the help of family, peers, and social networks. First-time mothers need support from professionals and reliable online communities for postpartum recovery and parenting.

Keyword

Mothers; Postnatal care; Qualitative research; Social support

Reference

References

1. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO technical consultation on postpartum and postnatal care [Internet]. Geneva: Author;2010. [cited 2023 Sep 23]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK310595/.

2. De Sousa Machado T, Chur-Hansen A, Due C. First-time mothers’ perceptions of social support: recommendations for best practice. Health Psychol Open. 2020; 7(1):2055102919898611. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055102919898611.

3. House JS. Work stress and social support. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley Publishing Company;1981. p. 156.

4. Thoits PA. Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. J Health Soc Behav. 2011; 52(2):145–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510395592.

5. Hidalgo-Fuentes S, Martínez-Álvarez I, Sospedra-Baeza MJ, Martí-Vilar M, Merino-Soto C, Toledano-Toledano F. Emotional intelligence and perceived social support: its relationship with subjective well-being. Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(6):634. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12060634.

6. Donovan J, Chiatti BD, McKeever A, Bloch JR, Gonzales MS, Birati Y. “Yes, I can bond.” Reflections of autistic women’s mothering experiences in the early postpartum period. Womens Health (Lond). 2023; 19:17455057231175312. https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057231175312.

7. Al Hadi A, Dawson J, Paliwoda M, Walker K, New K. Healthcare providers’ views of information, support, and services offered to women in the postnatal follow-up care period in Oman: a qualitative study. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2023; 11(1):2–13. https://doi.org/10.30476/IJCBNM.2022.96663.2140.

8. McLeish J, Harvey M, Redshaw M, Alderdice F. A qualitative study of first time mothers’ experiences of postnatal social support from health professionals in England. Women Birth. 2021; 34(5):e451–e460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2020.10.012.

9. Im MY. The experience of ceserean delivery in primiparous mothers [master’s thesis]. Chungju: Korea National University of Transportation;2015. 21–22.

10. Schobinger E, Vanetti M, Ramelet AS, Horsch A. Social support needs of first-time parents in the early-postpartum period: a qualitative study. Front Psychiatry. 2022; 13:1043990. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1043990.

11. Song JE, Chae HJ, Park BL. Experiences of Sanhujori facility use among the first time mothers by the focus group interview. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2015; 21(3):184–196. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2015.21.3.184.

12. Kim Y, Lee H, Park GS. Experience of Korean primipara women’s induction of labor. J Qual Res. 2017; 18(2):209–219. https://doi.org/10.22284/qr.2017.18.2.209.

13. Kim DY. Experiences of pregnancy and childbearing in primipara with advanced age [master’s thesis]. Seoul: Hanyang University;2018. 34–86.

14. Colaizzi PF. Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In : Valle RS, King M, editors. Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology. New York: Oxford University Press;1978. p. 48–71.

15. Jang HJ. First-time mothers’ experience in postpartum care center. Early Child Edu Care. 2021; 16(1):5–27. https://doi.org/10.16978/ecec.2021.16.1.001.

16. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19(6):349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.

17. Park SY, Wee H. Subjectivity on ‘Sanhujori’ of pregnant women: Q methodological approach. J Korea Soc Wellness. 2018; 13(1):151–164. https://doi.org/10.21097/ksw.2018.02.13.1.151.

18. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publication;1985. p. 289–331.

19. Slomian J, Emonts P, Vigneron L, Acconcia A, Glowacz F, Reginster JY, et al. Identifying maternal needs following childbirth: a qualitative study among mothers, fathers and professionals. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017; 17(1):213. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1398-1.

20. McLeish J, Redshaw M. Peer support during pregnancy and early parenthood: a qualitative study of models and perceptions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015; 15:257. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0685-y.

21. Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2021 case studies of local government support policies for birth rate increase [Internet]. Sejong: Author; 2023 [cited 2024 Mar 9]. Available from: http://www.mohw.go.kr/board.es?mid=a10411010100&bid=0019&act=view&list_no=371008&tag=&nPage=13.

22. Park HR. Verifying effectiveness of local governments’ childbirth policies and policy implication. Tax Issue Pap. 2023; (97):1–11.

23. Lee SY. Policy monitoring and tasks for pregnancy and childbirth support. Health Welf Forum. 2023; 317:7–20. https://doi.org/10.23062/2023.03.2.

24. Kim YH, Lee KS, Hong SJ. A qualitative study on psychosocial characteristics of husbands having wives with postpartum depression. Korean J Women Psychol. 2017; 22(4):593–621.

25. Min HY, Jeong GH. Advanced aged women’s needs for pregnancy and childbirth care. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2015; 21(4):332–341. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2015.21.4.332.

26. Do YR. Care-related topic trends during COVID-19 on an online parenting forum: topic modeling by family life cycle. J Fam Better Life. 2023; 41(1):29–47. https://doi.org/10.7466/JFBL.2023.41.1.29.

27. Xiao X, Ngai FW, Zhu SN, Loke AY. The experiences of early postpartum Shenzhen mothers and their need for home visit services: a qualitative exploratory study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019; 20(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2686-8.

28. Kim EJ, Song HJ, Bae HJ, Sun BY, Choi JH, Hwang JM. Paradigm shift in policy responses to low birthrates (I): an analysis of the gendered life perspective and policy validation of youth. Report No.: 2019-20. Seoul: Korean Women’s Development Institute;2019. p. 221–225.