J Korean Neurosurg Soc.  2024 Jul;67(4):467-476. 10.3340/jkns.2023.0178.

Clinical Safety and Efficiency of the H-Port for Treatment of Leptomeningeal Metastasis

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Department of Cancer Control, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
  • 3Neuro-Oncology Clinic, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea

Abstract


Objective
: To evaluate the usefulness of a cranial implantable chemoport, the H-port, as an alternative to the Ommaya reservoir for intraventricular chemotherapy/cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) access in patients with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM).
Methods
: One hundred fifty-two consecutive patients with a diagnosis of LM and who underwent H-port installation between 2015 and 2021 were evaluated. Adverse events associated with installation and intraventricular chemotherapy, and the rate of increased intracranial pressure (ICP) control via the port were evaluated for safety and efficacy. These indices were compared with published data of Ommaya (n=89), from our institution.
Results
: Time-to-install and installation-related complications of intracranial hemorrhage (n=2) and catheter malposition (n=5) were not significantly different between the two groups. Intraventricular chemotherapy-related complications of CSF leakage occurred more frequently in the Ommaya than in the H-port group (13/89 vs. 3/152, respectively, p<0.001). Intracranial hemorrhage during chemotherapy occurred only in the Ommaya group (n=4). The CSF infection rate was not statistically different between groups (14/152 vs. 12/89, respectively). The ICP control rate according to reservoir type revealed a significantly higher ICP control rate with the H-port (40/67), compared with the Ommaya result (12/58, p<0.001). Analyzing the ICP control rate based on the CSF drainage method, continuous extraventricular drainage (implemented only with the H-port), found a significantly higher ICP control rate than with intermittent CSF drainage (33/40 vs. 6/56, respectively, p<0.0001).
Conclusion
: The H-port for intraventricular chemotherapy in patients with LM was superior for ICP control; it had equal or lower complication rates than the Ommaya reservoir.

Keyword

Chemoport; Intraventricular chemotherapy; Leptomeningeal metastasis; Ommaya reservoir

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Photographs of H-port and installation process. The composition (A) and dimension of H-port (B), and that of Ommaya reservoir for comparison (C), operative side view of burrhole and side outlet port connected to ventricular catheter (D), and photo takne from above of periosteal apron closure (E).

  • Fig. 2. Medical illustration of H-port used for continuous extraventricular drainage of cerebrospinal fluid drawn by medical illustrator.


Reference

References

1. Bleyer WA, Pizzo PA, Spence AM, Platt WD, Benjamin DR, Kolins CJ, et al. The Ommaya reservoir: newly recognized complications and recommendations for insertion and use. Cancer. 41:2431–2437. 1978.
Article
2. Byun YH, Gwak HS, Kwon JW, Kim KG, Shin SH, Lee SH, et al. A novel implantable cerebrospinal fluid reservoir : a pilot study. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 61:640–644. 2018.
Article
3. Chamberlain MC. Leptomeningeal metastases: a review of evaluation and treatment. J Neurooncol. 37:271–284. 1998.
4. Chamberlain MC. Radioisotope CSF flow studies in leptomeningeal metastases. J Neurooncol. 38:135–140. 1998.
5. Chamberlain MC, Kormanik P. Carcinoma meningitis secondary to nonsmall cell lung cancer: combined modality therapy. Arch Neurol. 55:506–512. 1998.
Article
6. Chamberlain MC, Kormanik PA. Prognostic significance of 111 indiumDTPA CSF flow studies in leptomeningeal metastases. Neurology. 46:1674–1677. 1996.
Article
7. Chamberlain MC, Kormanik PA, Barba D. Complications associated with intraventricular chemotherapy in patients with leptomeningeal metastases. J Neurosurg. 87:694–699. 1997.
Article
8. Chen Y, Liu L, Zhu M. Intraventricular administration of antibiotics by ommaya reservoir for patients with multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii central nervous system infection. Br J Neurosurg. 35:170–173. 2021.
Article
9. Gwak HS, Joo J, Kim S, Yoo H, Shin SH, Han JY, et al. Analysis of treatment outcomes of intraventricular chemotherapy in 105 patients for leptomeningeal carcinomatosis from non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 8:599–605. 2013.
Article
10. Gwak HS, Lee CH, Yang HS, Joo J, Shin SH, Yoo H, et al. Chemoport with a non-collapsible chamber as a replacement for an Ommaya reservoir in the treatment of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 153:1971–1978. discussion 1978. 2011.
Article
11. Hitchins RN, Bell DR, Woods RL, Levi JA. A prospective randomized trial of single-agent versus combination chemotherapy in meningeal carcinomatosis. J Clin Oncol. 5:1655–1662. 1987.
Article
12. Jacobs A, Clifford P, Kay HE. The Ommaya reservoir in chemotherapy for malignant disease in the CNS. Clin Oncol. 7:123–129. 1981.
13. Jung TY, Chung WK, Oh IJ. The prognostic significance of surgically treated hydrocephalus in leptomeningeal metastases. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 119:80–83. 2014.
Article
14. Kim HS, Park JB, Gwak HS, Kwon JW, Shin SH, Yoo H. Clinical outcome of cerebrospinal fluid shunts in patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. World J Surg Oncol. 17:59. 2019.
Article
15. Lee TL, Kumar A, Baratham G. Intraventricular morphine for intractable craniofacial pain. Singapore Med J. 31:273–276. 1990.
16. Lemann W, Wiley RG, Posner JB. Leukoencephalopathy complicating intraventricular catheters: clinical, radiographic and pathologic study of 10 cases. J Neurooncol. 6:67–74. 1988.
Article
17. Lishner M, Perrin RG, Feld R, Messner HA, Tuffnell PG, Elhakim T, et al. Complications associated with Ommaya reservoirs in patients with cancer. The Princess Margaret Hospital experience and a review of the literature. Arch Intern Med. 150:173–176. 1990.
Article
18. Liu HG, Liu DF, Zhang K, Meng FG, Yang AC, Zhang JG. Clinical application of a neurosurgical robot in intracranial ommaya reservoir implantation. Front Neurorobot. 15:638633. 2021.
Article
19. Obbens EA, Leavens ME, Beal JW, Lee YY. Ommaya reservoirs in 387 cancer patients: a 15-year experience. Neurology. 35:1274–1278. 1985.
20. Ommaya AK. Subcutaneous reservoir and pump for sterile access to ventricular cerebrospinal fluid. Lancet. 2:983–984. 1963.
Article
21. Ongerboer de Visser BW, Somers R, Nooyen WH, van Heerde P, Hart AA, McVie JG. Intraventricular methotrexate therapy of leptomeningeal metastasis from breast carcinoma. Neurology. 33:1565–1572. 1983.
Article
22. Rogers LR, Barnett G. Percutaneous aspiration of brain tumor cysts via the Ommaya reservoir system. Neurology. 41(2_part_1):279–282. 1991.
Article
23. Sandberg DI, Bilsky MH, Souweidane MM, Bzdil J, Gutin PH. Ommaya reservoirs for the treatment of leptomeningeal metastases. Neurosurgery. 47:49–54. discussion 54-55. 2000.
Article
24. Taillibert S, Laigle-Donadey F, Chodkiewicz C, Sanson M, Hoang-Xuan K, Delattre JY. Leptomeningeal metastases from solid malignancy: a review. J Neurooncol. 75:85–99. 2005.
Article
25. Takahashi M, Yamada R, Tabei Y, Nakamura O, Shinoura N. Navigationguided Ommaya reservoir placement: implications for the treatment of leptomeningeal metastases. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 50:340–345. 2007.
Article
26. Vinchurkar KM, Maste P, Togale MD, Pattanshetti VM. Chemoportassociated complications and its management. Indian J Surg Oncol. 11:394–397. 2020.
Article
27. Wasserstrom WR, Glass JP, Posner JB. Diagnosis and treatment of leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors: experience with 90 patients. Cancer. 49:759–772. 1982.
Article
28. Zubair A, De Jesus O. Ommaya Reservoir. StatPearls. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing;2022.
Full Text Links
  • JKNS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr