J Korean Med Sci.  2024 Jun;39(21):e178. 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e178.

Lessons From the Household Humidifier Disinfectant Tragedy (HHDT) With Focus on the Chemical Poisoning Surveillance System: Review and Recommendation

• Park DU
• Gassert TH
• Zoh KE
• Lee DY
• Sesana F
• Park S
• Yoon SY

• KMID: 2556292
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e178

Abstract

Background
Lessons learned from the Household Humidifier Disinfectant Tragedy (HHDT) in Korea, which poisoned thousands of citizens over a period of years, necessitated an examination of national poison prevention and surveillance systems. The objectives of this study are to identify essential changes needed in chemical poisoning prevention regulations and surveillance systems for effective poison control by comparing recent trends in international poison control center (PCC) operations, and to delineate the critical elements for establishing a state-of-the-art poison control surveillance system in Korea based on recent advances in PCCs with toxicovigilance.
Methods
A comprehensive review of Korea’s regulatory and surveillance systems for chemical health hazards, with a focus on household products under the HHDT, was conducted. A review of toxicovigilance systems in major countries shows that creating an effective national PCC requires key elements: a centralized database of toxic substances and poisoning cases, mandatory or voluntary reporting of poisoning cases, real-time alerts, collaboration among health organizations, and targeted follow-up of poisoned individuals.
Results
Significant deficiencies in Korea’s legislation, toxicological data management, and poisoning surveillance systems, explained the inadequate response of the Korean government to the HHDT for nearly 17 years until the end of 2011. Based on a review of PCC toxicovigilance systems in major countries, a national framework with five core components is recommended for establishing a modern comprehensive Korea PCC system with toxicovigilance capacity. The core components include establishment of a centralized database of toxic substances information and clinical poisoning cases, implementation of mandatory or permissive reporting of poisoning cases, real-time alert mechanisms, collaborative systems among health-related organizations, and clinical follow-up of poisoned sub-groups.
Conclusion
A rationale and framework for a state-of-the-art national Korean PCC with toxicovigilance is justified and offered. This proposed system could assist neighboring countries in establishing their own sophisticated, globally integrated PCC networks.

Keyword

Poison Control Center (PCC); Chemical Poisoning; Toxicovigilance Systems; Household Humidifier Disinfectant Tragedy (HHDT)

Reference

1. Park DU, Lee S, Lim HK, Kim SY, Kim J, Park J, et al. Comprehensive review on humidifier disinfectant (HD) products, focusing on the number of products and their disinfectant type. J Environ Health Sci. 2020; 46(5):481–494.

2. Cho DH, Zoh KE, Park T, Choi Y, Park DU. Critical review of the former Korean regulations for consumer chemicals and the humidifier disinfectant disaster. J Environ Health Sci. 2022; 48(3):183–194.

3. Park DU, Park S, Park JH, Park J, Hong SJ, Paek D. Abrupt rise of humidifier disinfectant associated health problems since 2008: was it chance or inevitable? J Environ Health Sci. 2020; 46(2):128–135.

4. Ryu SH, Park DU, Lee E, Park S, Lee SY, Jung S, et al. Humidifier disinfectant and use characteristics associated with lung injury in Korea. Indoor Air. 2019; 29(5):735–747. PMID: 31278778.

5. Korea Environmental Industry and Technology Institute (KEITI). A portal dedicated to supporting victims of the humidifier disinfectant tragedy in South Korea: statical status. Updated 2024. Accessed February 23, 2024. https://healthrelief.or.kr/home/content/stats01/view.do .

6. Kim HJ, Lee MS, Hong SB, Huh JW, Do KH, Jang SJ, et al. A cluster of lung injury cases associated with home humidifier use: an epidemiological investigation. Thorax. 2014; 69(8):703–708. PMID: 24488371.

7. Kim WY, Hong SB. Humidifier disinfectant-associated lung injury: six years after the tragic event. Tuberc Respir Dis. 2017; 80(4):351–357.

8. Korea Ministry of Environment (KMOE). Financial Support Report for Victims Associated with Humidifier Disinfectant Use. Sejong, Korea: KMOE;2023.

9. Kim KW, Ahn K, Yang HJ, Lee S, Park JD, Kim WK, et al. Humidifier disinfectant-associated children’s interstitial lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014; 189(1):48–56. PMID: 24199596.

10. Hong SB, Kim HJ, Huh JW, Do KH, Jang SJ, Song JS, et al. A cluster of lung injury associated with home humidifier use: clinical, radiological and pathological description of a new syndrome. Thorax. 2014; 69(8):694–702. PMID: 24473332.

11. National Poisons Information Service (NPIS). The NPIS’ homepage. Updated 2024. Accessed December 18, 2023. https://www.npis.org/ .

12. World Health Organization (WHO). Programme for the Promotion of Chemical Safety. International Programme on Chemical Safety. International Labour Organization. United Nations Environment Programme. User’s Manual for the IPCS INTOX Poisons Information Management System. Version 3.0 ed. New York, NY, USA: WexTech Systems;1994.

13. World Health Organization (WHO). Guidelines for Establishing a Poison Centre. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO;2020.

14. National Poisons Information Service (NPIS). National Poisons Information Service report 2021 to 2022. Updated 2023. Accessed December 18, 2023. https://www.npis.org/Download/NPIS%20report%202021-22.pdf .

15. Gummin DD, Mowry JB, Beuhler MC, Spyker DA, Rivers LJ, Feldman R, et al. 2021 Annual report of the National Poison Data System^© (NPDS) from America’s poison centers: 39th annual report. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2022; 60(12):1381–1643. PMID: 36602072.

16. Descotes J, Testud F. Toxicovigilance: a new approach for the hazard identification and risk assessment of toxicants in human beings. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005; 207(2):Suppl. 599–603. PMID: 15979670.

17. University of Ulsan College of Medicine; Asan Medical Center. Hospital based case-control study on lung injury with unknown causes. Public Health Wkly Rep. 2011; 4(45):825–829.

18. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA). Interim report of epidemiologic investigation of lung injury with unknown causes in Korea. Public Health Wkly Rep. 2011; 4(45):817–820.

19. Korea Ministry of Environment (KMOE). Toxic Chemicals Control Act [Enforcement Date 01. Jul, 1997.] [Act No.5221, 30. Dec, 1996., Whole Amendment]. Sejong, Korea: Korea Law Information Center;2024.

20. Korea Ministry of Environment (KMOE). Pharmaceutical Affairs Act [Enforcement Date 02. Dec, 2016.] [Act No.14328, 02. Dec, 2016., Partial Amendment]. Sejong, Korea: Korea Law Information Center;2023.

21. Federal Government of the United States. Title 40/Chapter I/Subchapter R: Toxic Substances Control Act. US Code of Federal Regulations. Washington, D.C., USA: U.S. Government Publishing Office;2024.

22. European Commission (EC). The Regulation on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH). EC 1907/2006. Brussels, Belgium: EC;2006.

23. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Polymer Exemption Guidance Manual. Washington, D.C., USA: US EPA;1997.

24. Korea Ministry of Environment (KMOE). Act on Registration and Evaluation of Chemical Substances [Enforcement Date 04. Jan, 2024.] [Act No. 19172, 03. Jan, 2023., Partial Amendment]. Sejong, Korea: Korea Law Information Center;2023.

25. Korea Ministry of Environment (KMOE). Consumer Chemical Products and Biocides Safety Control Act [Enforcement Date 31. Dec, 2021.] [Act No.18170, 18. May, 2021., Partial Amendment]. Sejong, Korea: Korea Law Information Center;2024.

26. Park DU, Kim J, Nam M, Mun E, Lee Y, Ha K, et al. Recommendation for the establishment of a poison control center at the Korea disease control and prevention agency. Environ Anal Health Toxicol. 2020; 35(3):e2020017. PMID: 32979902.

27. Seoul Poison Control Center (SPCC). SPCC’s homepage. Updated 2023. Accessed December 12, 2023. https://www.seoulpcc.or.kr/skill/info/centerInfo.do .

28. World Health Organization (WHO). Poison control and unintentional poisoning: world directory of poisons centres. Updated 2023. Accessed February 21, 2024. https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/topics/indicator-groups/poison-control-and-unintentional-poisoning .

29. National Assembly (KR). Proposed Act No. 19482. Prevention and Control of Health Hazard Act. Seoul, Korea: National Assembly;2023.

30. Litovitz T. The TESS database. Use in product safety assessment. Drug Saf. 1998; 18(1):9–19. PMID: 9466085.

31. Vermette AÉ, Dubé P, Gosselin S. Toxicovigilance: the monitoring of chemical health threats. Bulletin d’information Toxicologique. 2014; 30(1):14–37.

32. Hahn A, Michalak H, Begemann K, Meyer H, Burger R. Expert judgement of poisonings and human biomonitoring--the BfR three-level and matrix model. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2012; 215(2):242–246. PMID: 22227178.

33. National Poisons Centre (NPC). NPC’s homepage. Updated 2024. Accessed December 23, 2023. https://poisons.co.nz/ .

34. New Zealand Ministry of Health (NZMOH). The investigation and surveillance of poisoning and hazardous-substance injuries: guidelines for public health officers. Updated 2024. Accessed May 17, 2024. https://www.tewhatuora.govt.nz/assets/Publications/Environmental-health/The-Investigation-and-Surveillance-of-Poisoning-and-Hazardous-Substance-Injuries-Guidelines-for-public-health-officers .

35. Kumpula EK, Shieffelbien LM, Pomerleau AC. Enquiries to the New Zealand National Poisons Centre in 2018. Emerg Med Australas. 2021; 33(1):45–51. PMID: 32562367.

36. National Poisons Information Service (NPIS). Industry: CLP Regulation. Updated 2023. Accessed December 23, 2023. https://www.npis.org/Industry.html .

37. Cooper G, Dyas J, Thompson J.. United Kingdom Poisons Information Database (UKPID) - a centralised national database. Clin Toxicol. 2009; 47(7):743.

38. Korea Ministry of Environment (KMOE). Act on Registration and Evaluation of Chemicals [Enforcement Date 14. Oct, 2021.] [Act No.18034, 13. Apr, 2021., Partial Amendment]. Sejong, Korea: Korea Law Information Center;2023.

39. America’s Poison Centers (APC). National poison data system. Updated 2024. Accessed February 23, 2024. https://www.aapcc.org/national-poison-data-system .

40. Carpenter JE, Chang AS, Bronstein AC, Thomas RG, Law RK. Identifying incidents of public health significance using the national poison data system, 2013–2018. Am J Public Health. 2020; 110(10):1528–1531. PMID: 32816555.

41. Watson WA, Litovitz TL, Belson MG, Wolkin AB, Patel M, Schier JG, et al. The Toxic Exposure Surveillance System (TESS): risk assessment and real-time toxicovigilance across United States poison centers. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005; 207(2):Suppl. 604–610. PMID: 16023159.

42. Bateman DN, Good AM, Laing WJ, Kelly CA. TOXBASE: poisons information on the internet. Emerg Med J. 2002; 19(1):31–34. PMID: 11777868.

43. Geiderman JM, Marco CA. Mandatory and permissive reporting laws: obligations, challenges, moral dilemmas, and opportunities. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020; 1(1):38–45. PMID: 33000012.

44. German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR). Poisoning reports according to the National Chemicals Act and the Poison Information Regulation. Updated 2024. Accessed February 24, 2023. https://www.bfr.bund.de/en/poisoning_reports_according_to_the_national_chemicals_act_and_the_poison_information_regulation-10143.html .

45. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Injury in Australia: accidental poisoning. Updated 2023. Accessed December 12, 2023. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/injury/accidental-poisoning .

46. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). About the pesticide surveillance program. Updated 2022. Accessed February 23, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/pesticides/overview.html .

47. Foldy SL, Biedrzycki PA, Baker BK, Swain GR, Howe DS, Gieryn D, et al. The public health dashboard: a surveillance model for bioterrorism preparedness. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2004; 10(3):234–240. PMID: 15253519.

48. Wolkin AF, Patel M, Watson W, Belson M, Rubin C, Schier J, et al. Early detection of illness associated with poisonings of public health significance. Ann Emerg Med. 2006; 47(2):170–176. PMID: 16431230.

49. Laborde A. New roles for poison control centres in the developing countries. Toxicology. 2004; 198(1-3):273–277. PMID: 15138052.

50. Drug Information and Alerts Aotearoa New Zealand (DIANZ). DIANZ’s homepage. Updated 2024. Accessed February 23, 2024. https://www.highalert.org.nz/ .

51. Bertrand PG, Ahmed HA, Ngwafor R, Frazzoli C. Toxicovigilance systems and practices in Africa. Toxics. 2016; 4(3):13. PMID: 29051419.

52. Waring WS, Palmer SR, Bateman DN. Alerting and Surveillance Using Poisons Information Systems (ASPIS): outcomes from an international working group. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2007; 45(5):543–548. PMID: 17503264.

53. World Health Organization (WHO). International health regulations and chemical events. Updated 2024. Accessed February 24, 2024. https://www.who.int/teams/environment-climate-change-and-health/chemical-safety-and-health/incidents-poisonings/chemicals-and-the-ihr .