Obstet Gynecol Sci.  2024 May;67(3):279-285. 10.5468/ogs.23128.

A randomized controlled study comparing oral misoprostol with intramuscular oxytocin in active management of third stage of labour

• Sambo AA
• Ijaiya MA
• Nwachukwu D
• Nwosu IC
• Idris H
• Abdullateef RM
• Adewale FB

• KMID: 2555511
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.23128

Abstract

Objective
The study aimed to compare the effectiveness and side effects of 600 μg of oral Misoprostol with 10 international units (IU) intramuscular oxytocin in managing the third stage of labor.
Methods
This open-label, randomized controlled trial included 260 low-risk women in the second stage of labor with anticipated vaginal delivery. They were randomly assigned, to receive either 600 μg of misoprostol orally or 10 IU of oxytocin intramuscularly. The primary outcomes were blood loss during delivery and incidence of postpartum hemorrhage, evaluated using intention-to-treat analysis. Significance was set at P≤0.05.
Results
Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups (P>0.05). The misoprostol group had a significantly lower blood loss than that of the oxytocin group (306.57±176.44 mL vs. 349.37±135.50 mL; relative difference, -12.251 [95% confidence intervals [CI], -22.528 to -1.575]; P=0.012). Incidence of postpartum hemorrhage was similar in both the groups (relative risk [RR], 0.952 [95% CI, 0.543 to 0.671]; P=0.865). Additional oxytocic therapy requirement was also comparable (RR, 1.143 [95% CI, 0.671 to 1.947]; P=0.623). Nausea, shivering, and mean increase in temperature were significantly more common in the misoprostol group than in the oxytocin-parturient group.
Conclusion
In this study, 600 μg oral misoprostol was superior to intramuscular 10 IU oxytocin in reducing blood loss at birth, and equally effective in preventing postpartum hemorrhage. However, misoprostol exhibited more side effects compared to that of oxytocin.

Keyword

Postpartum haemorrhage; Misoprostol; Oxytocin; Nigeria

Reference

References

1. Escobar MF, Nassar AH, Theron G, Barnea ER, Nicholson W, Ramasauskaite D, et al. FIGO recommendations on the management of postpartum hemorrhage 2022. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022; 157(Suppl 1):3–50.

2. Bu SW, Alas-Pineda C, Aguilar-Andino D, Norwood DA, Gaitán-Zambrano K, Pinto-Romero M. Intraumbilical versus intramuscular oxytocin in the management of the third stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2023; 66:76–83.

3. Kumar A. Monument of love or symbol of maternal death: the story behind the Taj Mahal. CRWH. 2014; 1:4–7.

4. Gallos ID, Coomarasamy A. Carbetocin: worth the extra expense? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019; 61:55–65.

5. Sheldon WR, Blum J, Vogel JP, Souza JP, Gülmezoglu AM, Winikoff B. Postpartum haemorrhage management, risks, and maternal outcomes: findings from the World Health Organization Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health. BJOG. 2014; 121(Suppl 1):5–13.

6. United Nation. Sustainable development summit [Internet]. New York: WHO;c2015. [cited 2016 May 9]. Available from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org .

7. Sultana N, Begum F, Shermin S. Active management of the third stage of labour: a brief review and update. Bangladesh J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018; 33:149–56.

8. Vogel JP, Williams M, Gallos I, Althabe F, Oladapo OT. WHO recommendations on uterotonics for postpartum haemorrhage prevention: what works, and which one? BMJ Glob Health. 2019; 4:e001466.

9. Weeks AD, Baskett TF. Postpartumhaemorrhage. Anukumaran S, Robson M, editors. Munro kerr’s operative obstetrics e-book. 13th ed. New York: Elsevier;2019. p. 225–33.

10. Musa AO, Ijaiya MA, Saidu R, Aboyeji AP, Jimoh AA, Adesina KT, et al. Double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing misoprostol and oxytocin for management of the third stage of labor in a Nigerian hospital. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015; 129:227–30.

11. Charan J, Biswas T. How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research? Indian J Psychol Med. 2013; 35:121–6.

12. Ambardekar S, Shochet T, Bracken H, Coyaji K, Winikoff B. Calibrated delivery drape versus indirect gravimetric technique for the measurement of blood loss after delivery: a randomized trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14:276.

13. Uthman SG, Garba MA, Danazumi AG, Mandara MU, Sylvester NH. Comparative study of the side effect profiles of oral misoprostol and parenteral oxytocin used in prevention of postpartum haemorrhage in Maiduguri Nigeria. Open J Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 3:208–11.

14. Pangeni PR, Dhungana PR, Adhikari R. A comparative study: is misoprostol as effective as oxytocin in active management of third stage of labor? MJPAHS. 2020; 3:272–6.

15. Abd Allah WA, Hassan FI, Mohamed MF. Oral misoprostol versus intramuscular oxytocin in the active management of the third stage of labour. AMJ. 2021; 50:367–76.

16. Mishra S, Tirkey S, Prasad A, Trivedi K. A comparative study of sublingual misoprostol versus intramuscular oxytocin in the active management of third stage of labor. Cureus. 2023; 15:e33339.

17. Torloni MR, Gomes Freitas C, Kartoglu UH, Metin Gülmezoglu A, Widmer M. Quality of oxytocin available in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of the literature. BJOG. 2016; 123:2076–86.

18. Torloni MR, Bonet M, Betrán AP, Ribeiro-do-Valle CC, Widmer M. Quality of medicines for life-threatening pregnancy complications in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2020; 15:e0236060.

19. Kaudel S, Rana A, Ojha N. Comparison of oral misoprostol with intramuscular oxytocin in the active management of third stage of labour. NJOG. 2015; 10:76–80.

20. Lumbiganon P, Villar J, Piaggio G, Gülmezoglu AM, Adetoro L, Carroli G. Side effects of oral misoprostol during the first 24 hours after administration in the third stage of labour. BJOG. 2002; 109:1222–6.