Womens Health Nurs.  2024 Mar;30(1):9-17. 10.4069/whn.2024.03.08.1.

Discrete choice experiment for dyadic data collection: eliciting preferences of couple-based smoking cessation interventions

• Choi SH
• Templin T

• KMID: 2554186
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4069/whn.2024.03.08.1

Figure

• 

  Figure 1. Choice set, attributes, attribute levels, and profiles.

• 

  Figure 2. Sample choice set from the discrete choice experiment regarding the format and content of a couple-based smoking cessation intervention.

• 

  Figure 3. Flowchart of participant recruitment.

Reference

References

1. Phillips KA, Johnson FR, Maddala T. Measuring what people value: a comparison of “attitude” and “preference” surveys. Health Serv Res. 2002; 37(6):1659–1679. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.01116.

2. Soekhai V, de Bekker-Grob EW, Ellis AR, Vass CM. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: past, present and future. pharmacoeconomics. 2019; 37(2):201–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-018-0734-2.

3. Regmi K, Kaphle D, Timilsina S, Tuha NA. Application of discrete-choice experiment methods in tobacco control: a systematic review. Pharmacoecon Open. 2018; 2(1):5–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-017-0025-4.

4. Katz DA, Hamlin C, Vander Weg MW, Grant KM, Stewart Steffensmeier KR, Paez M, et al. Veterans’ preferences for tobacco treatment in primary care: a discrete choice experiment. Patient Educ Couns. 2020; 103(3):652–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.10.002.

5. Salloum RG, Abbyad CW, Kohler RE, Kratka AK, Oh L, Wood KA. Assessing preferences for a university-based smoking cessation program in Lebanon: a discrete choice experiment. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015; 17(5):580–585. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntu188.

6. Pesko MF, Kenkel DS, Wang H, Hughes JM. The effect of potential electronic nicotine delivery system regulations on nicotine product selection. Addiction. 2016; 111(4):734–744. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13257.

7. Scholz U, Stadler G, Ochsner S, Rackow P, Hornung R, Knoll N. Examining the relationship between daily changes in support and smoking around a self-set quit date. Health Psychol. 2016; 35(5):514–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000286.

8. Lüscher J, Stadler G, Scholz U. A daily diary study of joint quit attempts by dual-smoker couples: the role of received and provided social support. Nicotine Tob Res. 2017; 20(1):100–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntx079.

9. Powers MB, Vedel E, Emmelkamp PM. Behavioral couples therapy (BCT) for alcohol and drug use disorders: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2008; 28(6):952–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.02.002.

10. Porter LS, Gao X, Lyna P, Kraus W, Olsen M, Patterson E, et al. Pilot randomized trial of a couple-based physical activity videoconference intervention for sedentary cancer survivors. Health Psychol. 2018; 37(9):861–865. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000608.

11. Westmaas JL, Bontemps-Jones J, Bauer JE. Social support in smoking cessation: reconciling theory and evidence. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010; 12(7):695–707. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntq077.

12. Choi SH. A systematic review and narrative summary of couple-based smoking cessation interventions. J Soc Pers Relat. 2022; 39(7):1901–1916. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211070272.

13. Shoham V, Butler EA, Rohrbaugh MJ, Trost SE. Symptom-system fit in couples: emotion regulation when one or both partners smoke. J Abnorm Psychol. 2007; 116(4):848–853. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.116.4.848.

14. Rohrbaugh MJ, Shoham V, Skoyen JA, Jensen M, Mehl MR. We-talk, communal coping, and cessation success in a couple-focused intervention for health-compromised smokers. Fam Process. 2012; 51(1):107–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2012.01388.x.

15. Choi SH, Templin T, Marrocco A. Development of an online discrete choice experiment to elicit preferences for tobacco treatment among college students. J Am Coll Health. 2023; Jul. 12. [Epub]. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2023.2227715.

16. Faseru B, Richter KP, Scheuermann TS, Park EW. Enhancing partner support to improve smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 8(8):CD002928. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002928.pub4.

17. Cohen S, Lichtenstein E, Kingsolver K, Mermelstein R, Baer JS, Kamarck TW. Social support interventions for smoking cessation. In : Gottlieb BH, editor. Marshaling social support: formats, processes, and effects. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc;1988. p. 211–240.

18. SAS Institute Inc. JMP® 14 design of experiments guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc;2018.

19. Orme BK. Chapter 7. Sample size issues for conjoint analysis. In : Orme BK, editor. Getting started with conjoint analysis: strategies for product design and pricing research. 4th ed. Madison, WI: Research Publishers LLC;2019.

20. Veldwijk J, Determann D, Lambooij MS, van Til JA, Korfage IJ, de Bekker-Grob EW, et al. Exploring how individuals complete the choice tasks in a discrete choice experiment: an interview study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016; 16:45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0140-4.