Obstet Gynecol Sci.  2024 Mar;67(2):153-159. 10.5468/ogs.23231.

Potential applications of ChatGPT in obstetrics and gynecology in Korea: a review article

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MizMedi Hospital, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

The use of chatbot technology, particularly chat generative pre-trained transformer (ChatGPT) with an impressive 175 billion parameters, has garnered significant attention across various domains, including Obstetrics and Gynecology (OBGYN). This comprehensive review delves into the transformative potential of chatbots with a special focus on ChatGPT as a leading artificial intelligence (AI) technology. Moreover, ChatGPT harnesses the power of deep learning algorithms to generate responses that closely mimic human language, opening up myriad applications in medicine, research, and education. In the field of medicine, ChatGPT plays a pivotal role in diagnosis, treatment, and personalized patient education. Notably, the technology has demonstrated remarkable capabilities, surpassing human performance in OBGYN examinations, and delivering highly accurate diagnoses. However, challenges remain, including the need to verify the accuracy of the information and address the ethical considerations and limitations. In the wide scope of chatbot technology, AI systems play a vital role in healthcare processes, including documentation, diagnosis, research, and education. Although promising, the limitations and occasional inaccuracies require validation by healthcare professionals. This review also examined global chatbot adoption in healthcare, emphasizing the need for user awareness to ensure patient safety. Chatbot technology holds great promise in OBGYN and medicine, offering innovative solutions while necessitating responsible integration to ensure patient care and safety.

Keyword

Chatbots; Natural language processing; Obstetrics; Deep learning; Artificial intelligence

Reference

References

1. Haug CJ, Drazen JM. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in clinical medicine, 2023. N Engl J Med. 2023; 388:1201–8.
2. Lee P, Bubeck S, Petro J. Benefits, limits, and risks of GPT-4 as an AI chatbot for medicine. N Engl J Med. 2023; 388:1233–9.
3. Li SW, Kemp MW, Logan SJS, Dimri PS, Singh N, Mattar CNZ, et al. ChatGPT outscored human candidates in a virtual objective structured clinical examination in obstetrics and gynecology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023; 229:172e1–12.
4. Gilson A, Safranek CW, Huang T, Socrates V, Chi L, Taylor RA, et al. How does ChatGPT perform on the United States medical licensing examination? The implications of large language models for medical education and knowledge assessment. JMIR Med Educ. 2023; 9:e45312.
5. Waisberg E, Ong J, Masalkhi M, Kamran SA, Zaman N, Sarker P, et al. GPT-4: a new era of artificial intelligence in medicine. Ir J Med Sci. 2023; 192:3197–200.
6. Garg RK, Urs VL, Agarwal AA, Chaudhary SK, Paliwal V, Kar SK. Exploring the role of ChatGPT in patient care (diagnosis and treatment) and medical research: a systematic review. Health Promot Perspect. 2023; 13:183–91.
7. Biswas S. ChatGPT and the future of medical writing. Radiology. 2023; 307:e223312.
8. Takagi S, Watari T, Erabi A, Sakaguchi K. Performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on the Japanese medical licensing examination: comparison study. JMIR Med Educ. 2023; 9:e48002.
9. Eggmann F, Weiger R, Zitzmann NU, Blatz MB. Implications of large language models such as ChatGPT for dental medicine. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023; 35:1098–102.
10. Khan RA, Jawaid M, Khan AR, Sajjad M. ChatGPT - reshaping medical education and clinical management. Pak J Med Sci. 2023; 39:605–7.
11. Veras M, Dyer JO, Rooney M, Barros Silva PG, Rutherford D, Kairy D. Usability and efficacy of artificial intelligence chatbots (ChatGPT) for health sciences students: protocol for a crossover randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2023; 12:e51873.
12. Atlas S. ChatGPT for higher education and professional development: a guide to conversational AI [Internet]. College of Business Faculty Publications;c2023. [cited 2024 Jan 5]. Available from: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cba_facpubs/548/.
13. Suhag A, Kidd J, McGath M, Rajesh R, Gelfinbein J, Cacace N, et al. ChatGPT: a pioneering approach to complex prenatal differential diagnosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023; 5:101029.
14. Grünebaum A, Chervenak J, Pollet SL, Katz A, Chervenak FA. The exciting potential for ChatGPT in obstetrics and gynecology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023; 228:696–705.
15. Santo DSE, Joviano-Santos JV. Exploring the use of ChatGPT for guidance during unexpected labour. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023; 285:208–9.
16. Allahqoli L, Ghiasvand MM, Mazidimoradi A, Salehiniya H, Alkatout I. Diagnostic and management performance of ChatGPT in obstetrics and gynecology. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2023; 88:310–3.
17. Arslan S. Exploring the potential of Chat GPT in personalized obesity treatment. Ann Biomed Eng. 2023; 51:1887–8.
18. Sorin V, Klang E, Sklair-Levy M, Cohen I, Zippel DB, Balint Lahat N, et al. Large language model (ChatGPT) as a support tool for breast tumor board. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2023; 9:44.
19. Jeblick K, Schachtner B, Dexl J, Mittermeier A, Stüber AT, Topalis J, et al. Chatgpt makes medicine easy to swallow: an exploratory case study on simplified radiology reports. Eur Radiol. 2023. Oct. 5. [Epub]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-10213-1.
20. Park SH, Do KH, Kim S, Park JH, Lim YS. What should medical students know about artificial intelligence in medicine? J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2019; 16:18.
21. Huh S. Are ChatGPT’s knowledge and interpretation ability comparable to those of medical students in Korea for taking a parasitology examination?: a descriptive study. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2023; 20:1.
22. Oh N, Choi GS, Lee WY. ChatGPT goes to the operating room: evaluating GPT-4 performance and its potential in surgical education and training in the era of large language models. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2023; 104:269–73.
23. Chung K, Cho HY, Park JY. A chatbot for perinatal women’s and partners’ obstetric and mental health care: development and usability evaluation study. JMIR Med Inform. 2021; 9:e18607.
24. Dwivedi YK, Kshetri N, Hughes L, Slade EL, Jeyaraj A, Kar AK, et al. “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. Int J Inf Manage. 2023; 71:102642.
25. Liu J, Wang C, Liu S. Utility of ChatGPT in clinical practice. J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e48568.
26. Chavez MR, Butler TS, Rekawek P, Heo H, Kinzler WL. Chat generative pre-trained transformer: why we should embrace this technology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023; 228:706–11.
Full Text Links
  • OGS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr