Yonsei Med J.  2024 Mar;65(3):174-180. 10.3349/ymj.2023.0341.

Smartphone AI vs. Medical Experts: A Comparative Study in Prehospital STEMI Diagnosis

Affiliations
  • 1National Fire Agency Pre-hospital Emergency Medical Research TF, Sejong, Korea
  • 2National Emergency Medical Center, National Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
  • 3Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
  • 4Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
  • 5ARPI Inc., Seongnam, Korea
  • 6Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea

Abstract

Purpose
Prehospital telecardiology facilitates early ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) detection, yet its widespread implementation remains challenging. Extracting digital STEMI biomarkers from printed electrocardiograms (ECGs) using phone cameras could offer an affordable and scalable solution. This study assessed the feasibility of this approach with real-world prehospital ECGs.
Materials and Methods
Patients suspected of having STEMI by emergency medical technicians (EMTs) were identified from a policy research dataset. A deep learning-based ECG analyzer (QCGTM analyzer) extracted a STEMI biomarker (qSTEMI) from prehospital ECGs. The biomarker was compared to a group of human experts, including five emergency medical service directors (boardcertified emergency physicians) and three interventional cardiologists based on their consensus score (number of participants answering “yes” for STEMI). Non-inferiority of the biomarker was tested using a 0.100 margin of difference in sensitivity and specificity.
Results
Among 53 analyzed patients (24 STEMI, 45.3%), the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of qSTEMI and consensus score were 0.815 (0.691–0.938) and 0.736 (0.594–0.879), respectively (p=0.081). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of qSTEMI were 0.750 (0.583–0.917), 0.862 (0.690–0.966), 0.826 (0.679– 0.955), and 0.813 (0.714–0.929), respectively. For the consensus score, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 0.708 (0.500– 0.875), 0.793 (0.655–0.966), 0.750 (0.600–0.941), and 0.760 (0.655–0.880), respectively. The 95% confidence interval of sensitivity and specificity differences between qSTEMI and consensus score were 0.042 (-0.099–0.182) and 0.103 (-0.043–0.250), respectively, confirming qSTEMI’s non-inferiority.
Conclusion
The digital STEMI biomarker, derived from printed prehospital ECGs, demonstrated non-inferiority to expert consensus, indicating a promising approach for enhancing prehospital telecardiology.

Keyword

Prehospital emergency care; emergency medical service; STEMI; deep learning; ECG
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr