Clin Exp Reprod Med.  2024 Mar;51(1):85-90. 10.5653/cerm.2023.06233.

Preferred strategy for euploid single embryo transfer in advanced maternal age: Fresh versus frozen

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey
  • 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kayseri System Hospital, In Vitro Fertilisation Center, Kayseri, Turkey
  • 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sisli Memorial Hospital, In Vitro Fertilisation Center, Istanbul, Turkey

Abstract


Objective
The purpose of this study was to compare fresh and frozen-thawed euploid blastocyst transfer protocols following preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) in cases of advanced maternal age.
Methods
A total of 330 patients were examined retrospectively. PGS was performed on the embryos of 146 patients for whom fresh transfers were chosen. In contrast, frozen-thawed euploid single embryo transfer (ET) was selected after PGS for 184 patients, and their embryos were vitrified. The percentage of euploid embryos and rates of implantation, pregnancy, and pregnancy continuity, as well as clinical and biochemical abortion rates, were compared.
Results
The numbers of retrieved oocytes, metaphase II oocytes, and fertilized ova were greater in the frozen-thawed group. The percentages of euploid embryos were comparable between the fresh and frozen-thawed groups (32% vs. 34.8%, respectively). The rates of implantation (46.6%vs. 62.5%), pregnancy (50% vs. 66.8%), ongoing pregnancy (38.4% vs. 53.8%), and live birth percentage (37.0% vs. 53.8%) were significantly higher in the frozen-thawed group. However, no significant differences were found in the clinical and biochemical abortion rates.
Conclusion
The use of frozen-thawed single euploid ET is associated with increased implantation and pregnancy rates compared to fresh single euploid ET with PGS.

Keyword

Euploidy; Frozen-thawed transfer; Preimplantation genetic screening
Full Text Links
  • CERM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr