Anesth Pain Med.  2024 Jan;19(1):68-69. 10.17085/apm.23121.

Reply to letter to the editor: Inter-transverse process blocks: caution about difference in methods

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan


Cited by  1 articles

Inter-transverse process blocks-clarifications
Raghuraman M Sethuraman
Anesth Pain Med. 2024;19(2):169-170.    doi: 10.17085/apm.24017.


Reference

1. Sethuraman RM. Inter-transverse process blocks: caution about difference in methods. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2023; 18:325–6.
Article
2. El-Boghdadly K, Wolmarans M, Stengel AD, Albrecht E, Chin KJ, Elsharkawy H, et al. Standardizing nomenclature in regional anesthesia: an ASRA-ESRA Delphi consensus study of abdominal wall, paraspinal, and chest wall blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021; 46:571–80.
Article
3. Yamamoto Y, Tanaka N, Kadoya Y, Umehara M, Suzuka T, Kawaguchi M. Bolus intertransverse process block and continuous erector spinae plane block for perioperative analgesic management of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: three cases report. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2023; 18:198–203.
Article
4. Kampitak W, Shibata Y. In response: new name, no novelty. Pain Physician. 2020; 23:E738–9.
5. Kim SH. Anatomical classification and clinical application of thoracic paraspinal blocks. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2022; 75:295–306.
Article
Full Text Links
  • APM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr