Korean J Women Health Nurs.  2023 Dec;29(4):274-290. 10.4069/kjwhn.2023.11.22.

Prevalence and associated factors of prenatal depression in pregnant Korean women during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study

• Kim ME
• Jung HN

• KMID: 2550992
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2023.11.22

Abstract

Purpose
This study investigated the effects of prenatal education characteristics, pandemic-related pregnancy stress, and health behaviors during pregnancy on prenatal depression in pregnant women during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: The participants were 180 pregnant Korean women, recruited from internet communities for pregnancy preparation, childbirth, and childcare, from July 5 to 15, 2022. The collected data were analyzed using the t-test, analysis of variance, the Mann-Whitney U-test, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and multiple regression analysis. Results: The scores for pandemic-related pregnancy stress (24.50±6.37) and health behaviors during pregnancy (67.07±9.20) were high. Nearly half of the participants (n=89, 49.4%) presented with prenatal depression, with scores of 10 or greater. Prenatal depression had a positive correlation with gestational age (r=.18, p=.019) and pandemic-related pregnancy stress (r=.27, p<.001), and a negative correlation with health behaviors during pregnancy (r=–.42, p<.001). The factors associated with prenatal depression were pandemic-related pregnancy stress (t=4.70, p<.001), marital satisfaction (dissatisfied) (t=3.66, p<.001), pregnancy healthcare practice behaviors (t=–3.31, p=.001), family type (weekend couple) (t=2.84, p=.005), and gestational age (t=2.32, p=.022). The explanatory power of these variables was 38.2%. Conclusion: Since participants had a high level of prenatal depression during the pandemic, and infectious diseases such as COVID-19 may recur, strategies should be developed to improve pregnant women’s mental health with consideration of the unique variables that are relevant in a pandemic. It is also necessary to develop efficient online prenatal education programs that can be implemented even in special circumstances such as social distancing, and to evaluate their effectiveness.

Keyword

COVID-19; Depression; Pregnancy; Prenatal education

Reference

References

1. Biaggi A, Conroy S, Pawlby S, Pariante CM. Identifying the women at risk of antenatal anxiety and depression: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2016; 191:62–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.11.014.

2. Berthelot N, Lemieux R, Garon-Bissonnette J, Drouin-Maziade C, Martel É, Maziade M. Uptrend in distress and psychiatric symptomatology in pregnant women during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020; 99(7):848–855. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13925.

3. Zhao T, Zuo H, Campbell SM, Jhangri GS, Dobson KS, Li JY, et al. The impacts of prenatal mental health issues on birth outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(13):7670. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137670.

4. Filippetti ML, Clarke ADF, Rigato S. The mental health crisis of expectant women in the UK: effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on prenatal mental health, antenatal attachment and social support. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022; 22(1):68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04387-7.

5. Ding X, Liang M, Wu Y, Zhao T, Qu G, Zhang J, et al. The impact of prenatal stressful life events on adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2021; 287:406–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.03.083.

6. King LS, Feddoes DE, Kirshenbaum JS, Humphreys KL, Gotlib IH. Pregnancy during the pandemic: the impact of COVID-19-related stress on risk for prenatal depression. Psychol Med. 2023; 53(1):170–180. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329172100132X.

7. Chen J, Cross WM, Plummer V, Lam L, Sun M, Qin C, et al. The risk factors of antenatal depression: a cross-sectional survey. J Clin Nurs. 2019; 28(19-20):3599–3609. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14955.

8. Omidvar S, Faramarzi M, Hajian-Tilak K, Nasiri Amiri F. Associations of psychosocial factors with pregnancy healthy life styles. PLoS One. 2018; 13(1):e0191723. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191723.

9. Kim EG, Park SK, Nho JH. Associated factors of depression in pregnant women in Korea based on the 2019 Korean Community Health Survey: a cross-sectional study. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2022; 28(1):38–45. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2022.02.03.1.

10. Yirmiya K, Yakirevich-Amir N, Preis H, Lotan A, Atzil S, Reuveni I. Women’s depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic: the role of pregnancy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(8):4298. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084298.

11. Shorey S, Loh DNL, Chan V, Chua C, Choolani MA. Parents’ perceptions of antenatal educational programs: a meta-synthesis. Midwifery. 2022; 113:103432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2022.103432.

12. Çankaya S, Şimşek B. Effects of antenatal education on fear of birth, depression, anxiety, childbirth self-efficacy, and mode of delivery in primiparous pregnant women: a prospective randomized controlled study. Clin Nurs Res. 2021; 30(6):818–829. https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773820916984.

13. Chen YL, Tseng CH, Cheong ML, Lien YJ, Wang SH, Chang CM, et al. Associations between antenatal education program and mental health outcomes in Taiwan: a population-based cohort study. Psychiatry Res. 2023; 322:115128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115128.

14. Artieta-Pinedo I, Paz-Pascual C, Grandes G, Espinosa M. Framework for the establishment of a feasible, tailored and effective perinatal education programme. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017; 17(1):58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1234-7.

15. Zhang Y, Ma ZF. Psychological responses and lifestyle changes among pregnant women with respect to the early stages of COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2021; 67(4):344–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764020952116.

16. Seok DB, Ju HO. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on depression during pregnancy: a cross-sectional study. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2023; 29(1):44–54. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2023.02.21.2.

17. Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW), Korea. Announcement of the results of the National Mental Health Survey on COVID-19 in the second quarter of 2022 [Internet]. Sejong: MOHW;2022. [cited 2022 Dec 10]. https://www.mohw.go.kr/board.es?mid=a10503010100&bid=0027&cg_code=.

18. Kang DI, Park E. Do taegyo practices, self-esteem, and social support affect maternal-fetal attachment in high-risk pregnant women? A cross-sectional survey. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2022; 28(4):338–347. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2022.12.16.

19. Han K, Kim M, Park JM. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, Korean version: reliability and validity. J Korean Soc Biol Ther Psychiatry. 2004; 10(2):201–207.

20. Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1987; 150:782–786. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.150.6.782.

21. Kim YK, Hur JW, Kim KH, Oh KS, Shin YC. Clinical application of Korean version of Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. J Korean Neuropsych Assoc. 2008; 47(1):36–44.

22. Preis H, Mahaffey B, Lobel M. Psychometric properties of the Pandemic-Related Pregnancy Stress Scale (PREPS). J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2020; 41(3):191–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2020.1801625.

23. Kim ME, Heo ML. Evaluating the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Pandemic-Related Pregnancy Stress Scale. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2023; 16:655–666. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S401210.

24. Wang HJ, Park HS, Kim IO. Comparison of prenatal health management state and educational needs for pregnant women with advanced maternal age and under the age of 35. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2013; 19(4):230–241. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2013.19.4.230.

25. Wang HJ, Kim IO. Effects of a mobile web-based pregnancy health care educational program for mothers at an advanced maternal age. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2015; 45(3):337–346. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2015.45.3.337.

26. Claridge AM, Beeson T, Wojtyna A, Hoxmeier J. Pregnant women’s experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed method exploration of prenatal depression. Couple Fam Psychol: Res Pract. 2021; 10(3):168–178. https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000178.

27. Baek SJ, Yun J, Nam J, Seo EY, Kwon SY, Lee CH, et al. Antenatal depressive symptoms and associated risk factors among pregnant women. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 2019; 58(4):346–352. https://doi.org/10.4306/jknpa.2019.58.4.346.

28. Kim M, Kim Y. The mediating effect of fatigue on the relationship between pregnancy stress and depression during the third trimester of pregnancy. J East-West Nurs Res. 2018; 24(1):81–89. https://doi.org/10.14370/jewnr.2018.24.1.81.

29. Kim M, Kim Y. Relationships between pregnancy stress, depression, and pregnancy outcome in pregnant women. J Learn-Cent Curric Instr. 2018; 18(21):1015–1532.

30. López-Morales H, Del-Valle MV, Andrés ML, Gelpi Trudo R, Canet-Juric L, Urquijo S. Longitudinal study on prenatal depression and anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2021; 24(6):1027–1036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-021-01152-1.

31. Nguyen LH, Nguyen LD, Ninh LT, Nguyen HT, Nguyen AD, Dam VAT, et al. COVID-19 and delayed antenatal care impaired pregnant women's quality of life and psychological well-being: what supports should be provided? Evidence from Vietnam. J Affect Disord. 2022; 298(Pt A):119–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.102.

32. Javaid S, Barringer S, Compton SD, Kaselitz E, Muzik M, Moyer CA. The impact of COVID-19 on prenatal care in the United States: qualitative analysis from a survey of 2519 pregnant women. Midwifery. 2021; 98:102991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2021.102991.

33. Penengo C, Colli C, Garzitto M, Driul L, Sala A, Degano M, et al. Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Pandemic-Related Pregnancy Stress Scale (PREPS) and its correlation with anxiety and depression. J Affect Disord. 2021; 294:48–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.076.

34. Ilska M, Kołodziej-Zaleska A, Brandt-Salmeri A, Preis H, Lobel M. Pandemic-related pregnancy stress assessment-Psychometric properties of the Polish PREPS and its relationship with childbirth fear. Midwifery. 2021; 96:102940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2021.102940.

35. Ilska M, Kołodziej-Zaleska A, Brandt-Salmeri A, Preis H, Lobel M. Pandemic stress and its correlates among pregnant women during the second wave of COVID-19 in Poland. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(21):11140. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111140.

36. Lablanche O, Salle B, Perie MA, Labrune E, Langlois-Jacques C, Fraison E. Psychological effect of COVID-19 pandemic among women undergoing infertility care, a French cohort - PsyCovART Psychological effect of COVID-19: PsyCovART. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2022; 51(1):102251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102251.

37. Li R, Yin T, Fang F, Li Q, Chen J, Wang Y, et al. Potential risks of SARS-CoV-2 infection on reproductive health. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020; 41(1):89–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.04.018.

38. Zhang JY, Cui YX, Zhou YQ, Li YL. Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on prenatal stress, anxiety and depression. Psychol Health Med. 2019; 24(1):51–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2018.1468028.

39. Pasha H, Faramarzi M, Chehrazi M, et al. Health-promotion and health-harming behaviours in pregnant women: role of coping strategies, anxiety, and depression. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022; 42(3):410–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2021.1910634.

40. Fathnezhad-Kazemi A, Aslani A, Hajian S. Association between perceived social support and health-promoting lifestyle in pregnant women: a cross-sectional study. J Caring Sci. 2021; 10(2):96–102. https://doi.org/10.34172/jcs.2021.018.

41. Matvienko-Sikar K, Pope J, Cremin A, Carr H, Leitao S, Olander EK, et al. Differences in levels of stress, social support, health behaviours, and stress-reduction strategies for women pregnant before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, and based on phases of pandemic restrictions, in Ireland. Women Birth. 2021; 34(5):447–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2020.10.010.

42. Kim TW, Lee JM. The increasing income inequality in times of COVID-19 and its policy implications. Health Welf Policy Forum. 2020; (290):20–33. https://doi.org/10.23062/2020.12.3.

43. Silva-Jose C, Nagpal TS, Coterón J, Barakat R, Mottola MF. The ‘new normal’ includes online prenatal exercise: exploring pregnant women’s experiences during the pandemic and the role of virtual group fitness on maternal mental health. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022; 22(1):251. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04587-1.

44. McNeil A, Hicks L, Yalcinoz-Ucan B, Browne DT. Prevalence & correlates of intimate partner violence during COVID-19: a rapid review. J Fam Violence. 2023; 38(2):241–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-022-00386-6.

45. Penengo C, Colli C, Cesco M, Croccia V, Degano M, Ferreghini A, et al. Stress, coping, and psychiatric symptoms in pregnant women in outpatient care during the 2021 second-wave COVID-19 pandemic. Front Psychiatry. 2022; 12:775585. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.775585.

46. Felsenthal E. deaths—and why its border is black for the second time in history [Internet]. New York: Time;2020. [cited 2022 Dec 30]. Available from: https://time.com/5887436/time-black-border-coronavirus/.

47. Graupensperger S, Calhoun BH, Patrick ME, Lee CM. Longitudinal effects of COVID-19-related stressors on young adults’ mental health and wellbeing. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2022; 14(3):734–756. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12344.

48. Łaskawiec D, Grajek M, Szlacheta P, Korzonek-Szlacheta I. Post-pandemic stress disorder as an effect of the epidemiological situation related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare (Basel). 2022; 10(6):975. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10060975.

49. Huang X, Sun W, Wang R, Wu H, Yu S, Fang X, et al. Present situation and the future development of web-based prenatal education in China: cross-sectional web-based survey. J Med Internet Res. 2022; 24(6):e28637. https://doi.org/10.2196/28637.

50. Kim MY, Kim GS, Kim S, Lee HJ. Participation in prenatal education, knowledge and attitude related to delivery, postpartum care, newborn care in nulliparous women. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2016; 22(3):139–150. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2016.22.3.139.

51. Min HY, Jeong GH. Advanced aged women’s needs for pregnancy and childbirth care. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2015; 21(4):332–341. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2015.21.4.332.

52. Kang SJ, Yang MJ. Factors influencing pregnancy stress in pregnant women in Korea: a cross-sectional study. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2022; 28(1):27–37. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2022.02.03.

53. Yoon KJ. Changes and tasks in Korea’s healthcare system in times of the COVID-19 pandemic. Health Welf Policy Forum. 2020; 2020(12):34–49. https://doi.org/10.23062/2020.12.4.

54. Narumoto K, Miyazaki K, Inoue M, Kaneko M, Okada T, Sugimura M. Investigating women’s health issues and help-seeking intentions in primary care in Japan: a cross-sectional study. BMC Primary Care. 2022; 23(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01862-0.

55. Spiby H, Stewart J, Watts K, Hughes AJ, Slade P. The importance of face to face, group antenatal education classes for first time mothers: a qualitative study. Midwifery. 2022; 109:103295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2022.103295.

56. Choi EJ, Ryu S, Chun H, Kwak W, Choi SK. Personal competence factors associated with better access to digital health. Sejong: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affiars;2022. p. 185.

57. Ciochoń A, Apanasewicz A, Danel DP, Galbarczyk A, Klimek M, Ziomkiewicz A, et al. Antenatal classes in the context of prenatal anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(9):5073. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095073.