Anesth Pain Med.  2023 Oct;18(4):349-356. 10.17085/apm.23031.

Spinal anesthesia in elective lumbar spinal surgery

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
  • 2Department of Anesthesiology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA

Abstract

Spinal anesthesia (SA) is gaining recognition as a safe and efficacious regional alternative to general anesthesia for elective lumbar surgery. However, unfamiliarity with management issues related to its use has limited the adoption of awake spine surgery, despite its benefits. Few centers in the United States routinely offer SA for elective lumbar surgery, and a comprehensive workflow to standardize SA for lumbar surgery is lacking. In this article, we examine recent literature on the use of SA in lumbar surgery, review the experience of our institution with SA in lumbar surgery, and provide a cohesive outline to streamline the implementation of SA from the perspective of the anesthesiologist. We review the critical features of SA in contemporary lumbar surgery, including selection of patients, methods of SA, intraoperative sedation, and management of several important technical considerations. We aimed to flatten the learning curve to improve the availability and accessibility of the technique for eligible patients.

Keyword

Spinal anesthesia; Neuroanesthesia; Spine surgery; Awake spine surgery; Intrathecal bupivacaine

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Patient selection and optimization algorithm for SA. SA: spinal anesthesia, BMI: body mass index, GEA: general endotracheal anesthesia, OSA: obstructive sleep apnea, CPAP: continuous positive airway pressure.


Reference

1. Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI, Kreuter W, Goodman DC, Jarvik JG. Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA. 2010; 303:1259–65.
2. Dietz N, Sharma M, Adams S, Alhourani A, Ugiliweneza B, Wang D, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for spine surgery: a systematic review. World Neurosurg. 2019; 130:415–26.
3. Hernandez NS, Rogers JL, Pham MH. Brachioradial pruritus caused by cervical disc herniation precipitated by trauma treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: report of two cases and review of the literature. Asian J Neurosurg 2003. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1772760. [Epub ahead of print].
4. De Biase G, Gruenbaum SE, West JL, Chen S, Bojaxhi E, Kryzanski J, et al. Spinal versus general anesthesia for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: implications on operating room time, pain, and ambulation. Neurosurg Focus. 2021; 51:E3.
Article
5. Olmos M, Hernandez NS, Kanter M, Liu P, Riesenburger RI, Kryzanski J. Periprocedural polypharmacy in lumbar fusions performed under spinal anesthesia compared with general anesthesia. Neurosurgery. 2023; 92:632–8.
Article
6. Hernandez NS, Wang AY, Kanter M, Olmos M, Ahsan T, Liu P, et al. Assessing the impact of spinal versus general anesthesia on postoperative urinary retention in elective spinal surgery patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2022; 222:107454.
Article
7. Brouwer TA, Van Roon EN, Rosier P, Kalkman CJ, Veeger N. Postoperative urinary retention: risk factors, bladder filling rate and time to catheterization: an observational study as part of a randomized controlled trial. Perioper Med (Lond). 2021; 10:2.
Article
8. Monk TG, Weldon BC, Garvan CW, Dede DE, Van der Aa MT, Heilman KM, et al. Predictors of cognitive dysfunction after major noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2008; 108:18–30.
Article
9. Weinstein SM, Poultsides L, Baaklini LR, Mörwald EE, Cozowicz C, Saleh JN, et al. Postoperative delirium in total knee and hip arthroplasty patients: a study of perioperative modifiable risk factors. Br J Anaesth. 2018; 120:999–1008.
Article
10. West JL, De Biase G, Bydon M, Bojaxhi E, Mendhi M, Quiñones-Hinojosa A, et al. What is the learning curve for lumbar spine surgery under spinal anesthesia? World Neurosurg. 2022; 158:e310–e6.
Article
11. Stewart J, Gasanova I, Joshi GP. Spinal anesthesia for ambulatory surgery: current controversies and concerns. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2020; 33:746–52.
Article
12. Rattenberry W, Hertling A, Erskine R. Spinal anaesthesia for ambulatory surgery. BJA Educ. 2019; 19:321–8.
Article
13. Nolte H, Schikor K, Gergs P, Meyer J, Stark P. [On spinal anaesthesia with isobaric bupivacaine 0,5% (author's transl)]. Anaesthesist. 1977; 26:33–7. German.
14. Uppal V, Retter S, Shanthanna H, Prabhakar C, McKeen DM. Hyperbaric versus isobaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia: systematic review and meta-analysis for adult patients undergoing noncesarean delivery surgery. Anesth Analg. 2017; 125:1627–37.
Article
15. Schnider TW, Minto CF, Bruckert H, Mandema JW. Population pharmacodynamic modeling and covariate detection for central neural blockade. Anesthesiology. 1996; 85:502–12.
Article
16. De Cassai A, Geraldini F, Boscolo A, Pasin L, Pettenuzzo T, Persona P, et al. General Anesthesia Compared to Spinal Anesthesia for Patients Undergoing Lumbar Vertebral Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Clin Med. 2020; 10:102.
Article
17. Perez-Roman RJ, Govindarajan V, Bryant JP, Wang MY. Spinal anesthesia in awake surgical procedures of the lumbar spine: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 3709 patients. Neurosurg Focus. 2021; 51:E7.
Article
18. Waguia R, Touko EK, Sykes DAW, Kelly-Hedrick M, Hijji FY, Sharan AD, et al. How to start an awake spine program: Protocol and illustrative cases. IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2022; 13:69–77.
Article
19. Zhang N, He L, Ni JX. Level of sensory block after spinal anesthesia as a predictor of hypotension in parturient. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96:e7184.
Article
20. Białowolska K, Horosz B, Sękowska A, Malec-Milewska M. Fixed dose versus height-adjusted conventional dose of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine for caesarean delivery: a prospective, double-blinded randomised trial. J Clin Med. 2020; 9:3600.
Article
21. Sng BL, Han NLR, Leong WL, Sultana R, Siddiqui FJ, Assam PN, et al. Hyperbaric vs. isobaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section: a Cochrane systematic review. Anaesthesia. 2018; 73:499–511.
Article
22. Helmi M, Uyun Y, Suwondo BS, Widodo U. Comparison of intrathecal use of isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine during lower abdomen surgery. Journal of Anesthesiology. 2014; 2014:141324.
Article
23. Tecklenburg-Weier E, Quest F, Nolte H, Meyer J. [The effect of patient positioning on the spread of sensory blockade in hyperbaric and isobaric spinal anesthesia using bupivacaine]. Reg Anaesth. 1990; 13:163–7. German.
24. Russell IF. Posture and isobaric subarachnoid anaesthesia. The influence on spread of spinal anaesthesia with 'isobaric' 0.5% bupivacaine plain. Anaesthesia. 1984; 39:865–7.
25. Hocking G, Wildsmith JA. Intrathecal drug spread. Br J Anaesth. 2004; 93:568–78.
Article
26. Stienstra R, Van Poorten F. Speed of injection does not affect subarachnoid distribution of plain bupivacaine 0.5%. Reg Anesth. 1990; 15:208–10.
27. Mancuso CA, Duculan R, Cammisa FP, Sama AA, Hughes AP, Lebl DR, et al. Concordance Between Patients' and Surgeons' Expectations of Lumbar Surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021; 46:249–58.
Article
28. Letchuman V, Agarwal N, Mummaneni VP, Wang MY, Shabani S, Patel A, et al. Awake spinal surgery: simplifying the learning curve with a patient selection algorithm. Neurosurg Focus. 2021; 51:E2.
Article
29. Ko JY, Leffert LR. Clinical implications of neuraxial anesthesia in the parturient with scoliosis. Anesth Analg. 2009; 109:1930–4.
Article
30. Tharion JG, Kale S. Patient satisfaction through an immersive experience using a Mobile Phone-Based Head-Mounted Display During Arthroscopic Knee Surgery Under spinal anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial. Anesth Analg. 2021; 133:940–8.
Article
31. Lamon AM, Einhorn LM, Cooter M, Habib AS. The impact of body mass index on the risk of high spinal block in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study. J Anesth. 2017; 31:552–8.
Article
32. Lim H, Oh M, Chung YH, Ki H, Lee JJ. Effects of continuous positive airway pressure in patients at high risk of obstructive sleep apnea during propofol sedation after spinal anesthesia. J Clin Monit Comput. 2019; 33:657–63.
Article
33. Practice guidelines for moderate procedural sedation and analgesia 2018: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Moderate Procedural Sedation and Analgesia, the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Dental Association, American Society of Dentist Anesthesiologists, and Society of Interventional Radiology. Anesthesiology. 2018; 28:437–79.
34. Arain SR, Ebert TJ. The Efficacy, Side effects, and recovery characteristics of dexmedetomidine versus propofol when used for intraoperative sedation. Anesth Analg. 2002; 95:461–6.
Article
35. Candiotti KA, Bergese SD, Bokesch PM, Feldman MA, Wisemandle W, Bekker AY, et al. Monitored anesthesia care with dexmedetomidine: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial. Anesth Analg. 2010; 110:47–56.
Article
36. Shin HJ, Woo Nam S, Kim H, Yim S, Han SH, Hwang JW, et al. Postoperative delirium after dexmedetomidine versus propofol sedation in healthy older adults undergoing orthopedic lower limb surgery with spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2023; 138:164–71.
37. Park JW, Kim EK, Lee HT, Park S, Do SH. The effects of propofol or dexmedetomidine sedation on postoperative recovery in elderly patients receiving lower limb surgery under spinal anesthesia: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis. J Clin Med. 2021; 10:135.
Article
38. Abdallah FW, Abrishami A, Brull R. The facilitatory effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine on the duration of spinal anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2013; 117:271–8.
39. Jeong J, Jin SH, Kim DY, Cho S, Lee H, Han JI. Effects of various methods of dexmedetomidine administration for sedation in elderly patients undergoing spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled study. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2020; 15:297–304.
Article
40. Zhao TY, Chen D, Sun H, Xu ZX, Lyu S, Wang T, et al. Moderate sedation with single-dose remimazolam tosilate in elderly male patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate with spinal anesthesia: a prospective, single-arm, single-centre clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022; 22:247.
Article
41. Kilpatrick GJ. Remimazolam: non-clinical and clinical profile of a new sedative/anesthetic agent. Front Pharmacol. 2021; 12:690875.
Article
42. Kumar AR, Guilleminault C, Certal V, Li D, Capasso R, Camacho M. Nasopharyngeal airway stenting devices for obstructive sleep apnoea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Laryngol Otol. 2015; 129:2–10.
Article
43. Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Connis RT, Abdelmalak BB, Agarkar M, Dutton RP, et al. 2022 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for management of the fifficult airway. Anesthesiology. 2022; 136:31–81.
Article
44. Olsen KS, Petersen JT, Pedersen NA, Rovsing L. Self-positioning followed by induction of anaesthesia and insertion of a laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal intubation and subsequent positioning for spinal surgery in the prone position: a randomised clinical trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014; 31:259–65.
45. Abrishami A, Zilberman P, Chung F. Brief review: airway rescue with insertion of laryngeal mask airway devices with patients in the prone position. Can J Anaesth. 2010; 57:1014–20.
Article
46. Hung MH, Fan SZ, Lin CP, Hsu YC, Shih PY, Lee TS. Emergency airway management with fiberoptic intubation in the prone position with a fixed flexed neck. Anesth Analg. 2008; 107:1704–6.
Article
47. Kramer DC, Lo JC, Gilad R, Jenkins A. Fiberoptic scope as a rescue device in an anesthetized patient in the prone position. Anesth Analg. 2007; 105:890.
Article
48. Southerland WA, Tollinche LE, Shapiro FE. Decision aids: the role of the patient in perioperative safety. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2019; 57:4–11.
Article
49. Marcantonio ER, Juarez G, Goldman L, Mangione CM, Ludwig LE, Lind L, et al. The relationship of postoperative delirium with psychoactive medications. JAMA. 1994; 272:1518–22.
Article
50. Breton JM, Ludwig CG, Yang MJ, Nail TJ, Riesenburger RI, Liu P, et al. Spinal anesthesia in contemporary and complex lumbar spine surgery: experience with 343 cases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2022; 36:534–41.
Article
51. Kanter M, Hernandez NS, Olmos M, Karimi H, Riesenburger RI, Kryzanski JT. Intraoperative triggered electromyography for pedicle screw placement under spinal anesthesia: a preliminary report. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2023; 24:651–5.
Article
52. Yang MJ, Riesenburger RI, Kryzanski JT. The use of intra-operative navigation during complex lumbar spine surgery under spinal anesthesia. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2022; 215:107186.
Article
53. Kathirvel S, Sadhasivam S, Saxena A, Kannan TR, Ganjoo P. Effects of intrathecal ketamine added to bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2000; 55:899–904.
Article
54. Adhikari P, Subedi A, Sah BP, Pokharel K. Analgesic effects of intravenous ketamine after spinal anaesthesia for non-elective caesarean delivery: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2021; 11:e044168.
Article
55. Wang AY, Olmos M, Ahsan T, Kanter M, Liu P, Balonov K, et al. A second prone dose algorithm for patients undergoing spinal anesthesia during thoracolumbar surgeries. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2023; 24:283–90.
Article
Full Text Links
  • APM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr