J Korean Med Sci.  2024 Jan;39(2):e28. 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e28.

Combination Analysis of PCDHGA12 and CDO1 DNA Methylation in Bronchial Washing Fluid for Lung Cancer Diagnosis

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, Konyang University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
  • 2Myunggok Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine, Konyang University, Daejeon, Korea
  • 3Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 4Genomictree, Inc., Daejeon, Korea
  • 5Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Konyang University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea

Abstract

Background
When suspicious lesions are observed on computer-tomography (CT), invasive tests are needed to confirm lung cancer. Compared with other procedures, bronchoscopy has fewer complications. However, the sensitivity of peripheral lesion through bronchoscopy including washing cytology is low. A new test with higher sensitivity through bronchoscopy is needed. In our previous study, DNA methylation of PCDHGA12 in bronchial washing cytology has a diagnostic value for lung cancer. In this study, combination of PCDHGA12 and CDO1 methylation obtained through bronchial washing cytology was evaluated as a diagnostic tool for lung cancer.
Methods
A total of 187 patients who had suspicious lesions in CT were enrolled. PCDHGA12 methylation test, CDO1 methylation test, and cytological examination were performed using 3-plex LTE-qMSP test.
Results
Sixty-two patients were diagnosed with benign diseases and 125 patients were diagnosed with lung cancer. The sensitivity of PCDHGA12 was 74.4% and the specificity of PCDHGA12 was 91.9% respectively. CDO1 methylation test had a sensitivity of 57.6% and a specificity of 96.8%. The combination of both PCDHGA12 methylation test and CDO1 methylation test showed a sensitivity of 77.6% and a specificity of 90.3%. The sensitivity of lung cancer diagnosis was increased by combining both PCDHGA12 and CDO1 methylation tests.
Conclusion
Checking DNA methylation of both PCDHGA12 and CDO1 genes using bronchial washing fluid can reduce the invasive procedure to diagnose lung cancer.

Keyword

Lung Cancer; DNA Methylation; PCDHGA12; CDO1; Bronchial Washing Fluid

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Flowchart of the combined analysis of protocadherin gamma subfamily A12 and cysteine dioxygenase type 1 DNA methylation for lung cancer.LTE-qMSP = Linear Target Enrichment-quantitative methylation specific real-time polymerase chain reaction, LC = lung cancer.aExcluded due to insufficient specimen quantity; bexcluded due to unclear diagnosis or metastatic cancer.

  • Fig. 2 The DNA methylation level of PCDHGA12 gene (A) and CDO1 (B) in lung cancer patients and non-LC patients. PCDHGA12 = protocadherin gamma subfamily A12, CDO1 = cysteine dioxygenase type 1, LC = lung cancer.

  • Fig. 3 Receiver operating characteristic curve for PCDHGA12 gene (A) and CDO1 (B) for diagnosing lung cancer in bronchial washing fluids. PCDHGA12 = protocadherin gamma subfamily A12, CDO1 = cysteine dioxygenase type 1, AUC = area under receiver operating characteristic.


Reference

1. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365(5):395–409. PMID: 21714641.
2. Tukey MH, Wiener RS. Population-based estimates of transbronchial lung biopsy utilization and complications. Respir Med. 2012; 106(11):1559–1565. PMID: 22938740.
3. Detterbeck FC, Lewis SZ, Diekemper R, Addrizzo-Harris D, Alberts WM. Executive summary: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013; 143(5 ):Suppl. 7S–37S. PMID: 23649434.
4. Kulis M, Esteller M. DNA methylation and cancer. Adv Genet. 2010; 70:27–56. PMID: 20920744.
5. Kandimalla R, van Tilborg AA, Zwarthoff EC. DNA methylation-based biomarkers in bladder cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2013; 10(6):327–335. PMID: 23628807.
6. Wang Y, Zhang M, Hu X, Qin W, Wu H, Wei M. Colon cancer-specific diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers based on genome-wide abnormal DNA methylation. Aging (Albany NY). 2020; 12(22):22626–22655. PMID: 33202377.
7. Darılmaz Yüce G, Ortaç Ersoy E. Lung cancer and epigenetic modifications. Tuberk Toraks. 2016; 64(2):163–170. PMID: 27481083.
8. Langevin SM, Kratzke RA, Kelsey KT. Epigenetics of lung cancer. Transl Res. 2015; 165(1):74–90. PMID: 24686037.
9. Mehta A, Dobersch S, Romero-Olmedo AJ, Barreto G. Epigenetics in lung cancer diagnosis and therapy. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2015; 34(2):229–241. PMID: 25939322.
10. Zhang C, Yu W, Wang L, Zhao M, Guo Q, Lv S, et al. DNA methylation analysis of the SHOX2 and RASSF1A panel in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for lung cancer diagnosis. J Cancer. 2017; 8(17):3585–3591. PMID: 29151944.
11. Dang Z, Shangguan J, Zhang C, Hu P, Ren Y, Lv Z, et al. Loss of protocadherin-17 (PCDH-17) promotes metastasis and invasion through hyperactivation of EGFR/MEK/ERK signaling pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2016; 37(2):2527–2535. PMID: 26386721.
12. Chen T, Long B, Ren G, Xiang T, Li L, Wang Z, et al. Protocadherin20 acts as a tumor suppressor gene: epigenetic inactivation in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Cell Biochem. 2015; 116(8):1766–1775. PMID: 25736877.
13. Taylor KH, Pena-Hernandez KE, Davis JW, Arthur GL, Duff DJ, Shi H, et al. Large-scale CpG methylation analysis identifies novel candidate genes and reveals methylation hotspots in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Res. 2007; 67(6):2617–2625. PMID: 17363581.
14. Lu Y, Lemon W, Liu PY, Yi Y, Morrison C, Yang P, et al. A gene expression signature predicts survival of patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS Med. 2006; 3(12):e467. PMID: 17194181.
15. Jeong IB, Yoon YS, Park SY, Cha EJ, Na MJ, Kwon SJ, et al. PCDHGA12 methylation biomarker in bronchial washing specimens as an adjunctive diagnostic tool to bronchoscopy in lung cancer. Oncol Lett. 2018; 16(1):1039–1045. PMID: 29963180.
16. Brait M, Ling S, Nagpal JK, Chang X, Park HL, Lee J, et al. Cysteine dioxygenase 1 is a tumor suppressor gene silenced by promoter methylation in multiple human cancers. PLoS One. 2012; 7(9):e44951. PMID: 23028699.
17. Harada H, Hosoda K, Moriya H, Mieno H, Ema A, Ushiku H, et al. Cancer-specific promoter DNA methylation of cysteine dioxygenase type 1 (CDO1) gene as an important prognostic biomarker of gastric cancer. PLoS One. 2019; 14(4):e0214872. PMID: 30934021.
18. Meller S, Zipfel L, Gevensleben H, Dietrich J, Ellinger J, Majores M, et al. CDO1 promoter methylation is associated with gene silencing and is a prognostic biomarker for biochemical recurrence-free survival in prostate cancer patients. Epigenetics. 2016; 11(12):871–880. PMID: 27689475.
19. Nishizawa N, Harada H, Kumamoto Y, Kaizu T, Katoh H, Tajima H, et al. Diagnostic potential of hypermethylation of the cysteine dioxygenase 1 gene (CDO1) promoter DNA in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Sci. 2019; 110(9):2846–2855. PMID: 31325200.
20. Ushiku H, Yamashita K, Ema A, Minatani N, Kikuchi M, Kojo K, et al. DNA diagnosis of peritoneal fluid cytology test by CDO1 promoter DNA hypermethylation in gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2017; 20(5):784–792. PMID: 28243814.
21. Wang P, Zhao H, Shi R, Liu X, Liu J, Ren F, et al. The role of plasma CDO1 methylation in the early diagnosis of lung cancer. Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2020; 23(5):314–320. PMID: 32317090.
22. Chung W, Bondaruk J, Jelinek J, Lotan Y, Liang S, Czerniak B, et al. Detection of bladder cancer using novel DNA methylation biomarkers in urine sediments. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011; 20(7):1483–1491. PMID: 21586619.
23. Kneip C, Schmidt B, Seegebarth A, Weickmann S, Fleischhacker M, Liebenberg V, et al. SHOX2 DNA methylation is a biomarker for the diagnosis of lung cancer in plasma. J Thorac Oncol. 2011; 6(10):1632–1638. PMID: 21694641.
24. Zhai X, Li SJ. Methylation of RASSF1A and CDH13 genes in individualized chemotherapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014; 15(12):4925–4928. PMID: 24998565.
25. An S, Oh T. Method for multiplex detection of methylated DNA. United States patent US11186866B2. Updated 2021. Accessed November 30, 2021. https://patents.google.com/patent/US11186866B2/en .
26. Funahashi A, Browne TK, Houser WC, Hranicka LJ. Diagnostic value of bronchial aspirate and postbronchoscopic sputum in fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Chest. 1979; 76(5):514–517. PMID: 498821.
27. Li W, Liu JB, Hou LK, Yu F, Zhang J, Wu W, et al. Liquid biopsy in lung cancer: significance in diagnostics, prediction, and treatment monitoring. Mol Cancer. 2022; 21(1):25. PMID: 35057806.
28. Rolfo C, Mack P, Scagliotti GV, Aggarwal C, Arcila ME, Barlesi F, et al. Liquid biopsy for advanced NSCLC: a consensus statement from the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2021; 16(10):1647–1662. PMID: 34246791.
29. Girard P, Caliandro R, Seguin-Givelet A, Lenoir S, Gossot D, Validire P, et al. Sensitivity of cytology specimens from bronchial aspirate or washing during bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of lung malignancies: an update. Clin Lung Cancer. 2017; 18(5):512–518. PMID: 28007409.
30. Villalba M, Exposito F, Pajares MJ, Sainz C, Redrado M, Remirez A, et al. TMPRSS4: a novel tumor prognostic indicator for the stratification of stage IA tumors and a liquid biopsy biomarker for NSCLC patients. J Clin Med. 2019; 8(12):2134. PMID: 31817025.
31. Topaloglu O, Hoque MO, Tokumaru Y, Lee J, Ratovitski E, Sidransky D, et al. Detection of promoter hypermethylation of multiple genes in the tumor and bronchoalveolar lavage of patients with lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2004; 10(7):2284–2288. PMID: 15073103.
32. Schnabel RM, van der Velden K, Osinski A, Rohde G, Roekaerts PM, Bergmans DC. Clinical course and complications following diagnostic bronchoalveolar lavage in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients. BMC Pulm Med. 2015; 15(1):107. PMID: 26420333.
33. Zhang H, Wang S, Zhong F, Liao M. Risk factors for air embolism following computed tomography-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2023; 29(3):478–491. PMID: 36994842.
34. Polat G, Özdemir Ö, Serçe Unat D, Karadeniz G, Ayrancı A, Unat OS, et al. Pneumothoraxes after CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy of the lung: a single-center experience with 3426 patients. Tuberk Toraks. 2023; 71(1):67–74. PMID: 36912411.
35. Na KJ, Park IK, Park S, Kang CH, Kim YT. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of surgical biopsy for histologic diagnosis of indeterminate nodules suspected for early stage lung cancer: comparison with percutaneous needle biopsy. J Korean Med Sci. 2020; 35(28):e261. PMID: 32686374.
36. Ji XY, Li H, Chen HH, Lin J. Diagnostic performance of RASSF1A and SHOX2 methylation combined with EGFR mutations for differentiation between small pulmonary nodules. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023; 149(11):8557–8571. PMID: 37097393.
37. Hulbert A, Jusue-Torres I, Stark A, Chen C, Rodgers K, Lee B, et al. Early detection of lung cancer using DNA promoter hypermethylation in plasma and sputum. Clin Cancer Res. 2017; 23(8):1998–2005. PMID: 27729459.
38. Marmor HN, Zorn JT, Deppen SA, Massion PP, Grogan EL. Biomarkers in lung cancer screening: a narrative review. Curr Chall Thorac Surg. 2023; 5:5. PMID: 37016707.
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr