Cancer Res Treat.  2024 Jan;56(1):272-279. 10.4143/crt.2023.616.

Risk Factors for Distant Metastasis in Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer after Curative Resection (KROG 1814)

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Center for Proton Therapy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
  • 3Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 4Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 5Department of Radiation Oncology, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
  • 6Department of Radiation Oncology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 7Department of Radiation Oncology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 8Department of Radiation Oncology, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
  • 9Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
  • 10Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Korea
  • 11Department of Radiation Oncology, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
  • 12Department of Radiation Oncology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 13Department of Radiation Oncology, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
  • 14Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Purpose
Risk factors predicting distant metastasis (DM) in extrahepatic bile duct cancer (EHBDC) patients treated with curative resection were investigated.
Materials and Methods
Medical records of 1,418 EHBDC patients undergoing curative resection between Jan 2000 and Dec 2015 from 14 institutions were reviewed. After resection, 924 patients (67.6%) were surveilled without adjuvant therapy, 297 (21.7%) were treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and 148 (10.8%) with CCRT followed by chemotherapy. To exclude the treatment effect from innate confounders, patients not treated with adjuvant therapy were evaluated.
Results
After a median follow-up of 36.7 months (range, 2.7 to 213.2 months), the 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rate was 57.7%. On multivariate analysis, perihilar or diffuse tumor (hazard ratio [HR], 1.391; p=0.004), poorly differentiated histology (HR, 2.014; p < 0.001), presence of perineural invasion (HR, 1.768; p < 0.001), positive nodal metastasis (HR, 2.670; p < 0.001) and preoperative carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 ≥ 37 U/mL (HR, 1.353; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with inferior DMFS. The DMFS rates significantly differed according to the number of these risk factors. For validation, patients who underwent adjuvant therapy were evaluated. In patients with ≥ 3 factors, additional chemotherapy after CCRT resulted in a superior DMFS compared with CCRT alone (5-year rate, 47.6% vs. 27.7%; p=0.001), but the benefit of additional chemotherapy was not observed in patients with 0-2 risk factors.
Conclusion
Tumor location, histologic differentiation, perineural invasion, lymph node metastasis, and preoperative CA 19-9 level predicted DM risk in resected EHBDC. These risk factors might help identifying a subset of patients who could benefit from additional chemotherapy after resection.

Keyword

Extrahepatic bile duct cancer; Distant metastasis; Risk factors

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Flow diagram of patient selection. CCRT, concurrent chemoradiotherapy; EHBDC, Extrahepatic bile duct cancer; RT, radiotherapy.

  • Fig. 2. Kaplan-Meier curves for overall, locoregional recurrence-free, and distant metastasis-free survival in patients undergoing surgery alone.

  • Fig. 3. Kaplan-Meier curves for distant metastasis-free survival according to the number of risk factors in patients undergoing surgery alone.

  • Fig. 4. Kaplan-Meier curves for distant metastasis-free survival according to the receipt of chemotherapy after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with 0-2 risk factors (A) and 3-5 risk factors (B).


Reference

References

1. Henson DE, Albores-Saavedra J, Corle D. Carcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts. Histologic types, stage of disease, grade, and survival rates. Cancer. 1992; 70:1498–501.
2. Kopelson G, Galdabini J, Warshaw AL, Gunderson LL. Patterns of failure after curative surgery for extra-hepatic biliary tract carcinoma: implications for adjuvant therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1981; 7:413–7.
3. Launois B, Reding R, Lebeau G, Buard JL. Surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: French experience in a collective survey of 552 extrahepatic bile duct cancers. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2000; 7:128–34.
4. Spolverato G, Bagante F, Ethun CG, Poultsides G, Tran T, Idrees K, et al. Defining the chance of statistical cure among patients with extrahepatic biliary tract cancer. World J Surg. 2017; 41:224–31.
5. Jang JY, Kim SW, Park DJ, Ahn YJ, Yoon YS, Choi MG, et al. Actual long-term outcome of extrahepatic bile duct cancer after surgical resection. Ann Surg. 2005; 241:77–84.
6. Koo TR, Eom KY, Kim IA, Cho JY, Yoon YS, Hwang DW, et al. Patterns of failure and prognostic factors in resected extrahepatic bile duct cancer: implication for adjuvant radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol J. 2014; 32:63–9.
7. Kim TH, Han SS, Park SJ, Lee WJ, Woo SM, Moon SH, et al. Role of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resected extrahepatic biliary tract cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011; 81:e853–9.
8. Kim K, Chie EK, Jang JY, Kim SW, Han SW, Oh DY, et al. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after curative resection for extrahepatic bile duct cancer: a long-term single center experience. Am J Clin Oncol. 2012; 35:136–40.
9. Rizzo A, Brandi G. Pitfalls, challenges, and updates in adjuvant systemic treatment for resected biliary tract cancer. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021; 15:547–54.
10. Anderson C, Kim R. Adjuvant therapy for resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a review of the literature and future directions. Cancer Treat Rev. 2009; 35:322–7.
11. Kim K, Yu JI, Jung W, Kim TH, Seong J, Kim WC, et al. Role of adjuvant radiotherapy in extrahepatic bile duct cancer: a multicenter retrospective study (Korean Radiation Oncology Group 18-14). Eur J Cancer. 2021; 157:31–9.
12. McNamara MG, Walter T, Horgan AM, Amir E, Cleary S, McKeever EL, et al. Outcome of adjuvant therapy in biliary tract cancers. Am J Clin Oncol. 2015; 38:382–7.
13. Krasnick BA, Jin LX, Davidson JT 4th, Sanford DE, Ethun CG, Pawlik TM, et al. Adjuvant therapy is associated with improved survival after curative resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A multi-institution analysis from the U.S. extrahepatic biliary malignancy consortium. J Surg Oncol. 2018; 117:363–71.
14. Glazer ES, Liu P, Abdalla EK, Vauthey JN, Curley SA. Neither neoadjuvant nor adjuvant therapy increases survival after biliary tract cancer resection with wide negative margins. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012; 16:1666–71.
15. Ebata T, Hirano S, Konishi M, Uesaka K, Tsuchiya Y, Ohtsuka M, et al. Randomized clinical trial of adjuvant gemcitabine chemotherapy versus observation in resected bile duct cancer. Br J Surg. 2018; 105:192–202.
16. Primrose JN, Fox RP, Palmer DH, Malik HZ, Prasad R, Mirza D, et al. Capecitabine compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer (BILCAP): a randomised, controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019; 20:663–73.
17. Shroff RT, Kennedy EB, Bachini M, Bekaii-Saab T, Crane C, Edeline J, et al. Adjuvant therapy for resected biliary tract cancer: ASCO clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37:1015–27.
18. Bridgewater J, Fletcher P, Palmer DH, Malik HZ, Prasad R, Mirza D, et al. Long-term outcomes and exploratory analyses of the randomized phase III BILCAP study. J Clin Oncol. 2022; 40:2048–57.
19. Kim K, Chie EK, Jang JY, Kim SW, Han SW, Oh DY, et al. Distant metastasis risk stratification for patients undergoing curative resection followed by adjuvant chemoradiation for extrahepatic bile duct cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012; 84:81–7.
20. Lim KH, Oh DY, Chie EK, Jang JY, Im SA, Kim TY, et al. Adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) alone versus CCRT followed by adjuvant chemotherapy: which is better in patients with radically resected extrahepatic biliary tract cancer?: a non-randomized, single center study. BMC Cancer. 2009; 9:345.
21. Im JH, Seong J, Lee IJ, Park JS, Yoon DS, Kim KS, et al. Surgery alone versus surgery followed by chemotherapy and radiotherapy in resected extrahepatic bile duct cancer: treatment outcome analysis of 336 patients. Cancer Res Treat. 2016; 48:583–95.
22. Ecker BL, Vining CC, Roses RE, Maggino L, Lee MK, Drebin JA, et al. Identification of patients for adjuvant therapy after resection of carcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts: a propensity score-matched analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017; 24:3926–33.
23. Choi SH, Rim CH, Shin IS, Yoon WS, Koom WS, Seong J. Adjuvant radiotherapy for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a quality assessment-based meta-analysis. Liver Cancer. 2021; 10:419–32.
Full Text Links
  • CRT
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr