Anat Cell Biol.  2023 Dec;56(4):456-462. 10.5115/acb.23.109.

The use of precontoured plates for midshaft clavicle fractures is not always the best course of treatment

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India
  • 2Department of Anatomy, NSCB Medical College, Jabalpur, India
  • 3Department of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India

Abstract

Plate fixation has become the preferred approach for treating displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. However, plate fixation of the clavicle presents several unique challenges, including its complex bony architecture and its immediate subcutaneous location. In many cases, we have observed that precontoured implants do not conform to the clavicular anatomy, and many patients complain of postoperative implant-related discomfort. A total of 111 clavicles, both left and right sides, were examined to match two commonly used designs of anatomical pre-contoured superior anterior clavicle plates, with and without lateral extension. The anteroposterior (AP) plane congruence of the plate to the underlying bone, the vertical gap between the bone and plate, and the length of the plate that was off the bone either anteriorly and/or posteriorly at both ends of the clavicle were measured. The scoring system was used to determine the fit of the implant on the clavicle as anatomic, good, or poor. We found that the maximum superior bow of the clavicle was lateral to the midline by 30.75 mm and 30.5 mm on the right and left sides, respectively. The magnitude of the bow was 4.28 mm and 4.46 mm on the right and left sides, respectively. We also found that the plate was a poor fit in 75.86% of cases on the left side and 73.5% of cases on the right side. Manipulating the plates during surgery was very difficult in the AP plane.

Keyword

Clavicle; Bone plate; Fracture malunion; Fracture fixation; Orthopedic procedures

Figure

  • Fig. 1 (A) Showing anatomical pre-countered superior anterior clavicle plate (SACP) without lateral extension (B) anatomical pre-countered SACP, with lateral extension.

  • Fig. 2 Showing the mismatch of congruence of length/distance at the medial end of clavicle marked by black dotted line and red arrow indicating the gap between clavicle and plate. At arrow 1, ther is minimum gap while at arrow 3 the gap is maximum.

  • Fig. 3 Showing the measurement of anteroposterior congruence of plate to the underlying clavicle at lateral end with reference to anterior margin. If the plate is directed backwards as direction of red arrow, the value noted in positive number and if it extends beyond the border of bone, the value noted as negative as directed by yellow arrow.

  • Fig. 4 Showing vertical gap between the bone and plate at the medial end of the clavicle. The gap is indicated by red arrow.


Reference

References

1. Wijdicks FJ, Van der Meijden OA, Millett PJ, Verleisdonk EJ, Houwert RM. 2012; Systematic review of the complications of plate fixation of clavicle fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 132:617–25. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-011-1456-5. PMID: 22237694. PMCID: PMC3332382.
Article
2. Amer KM, Congiusta DV, Suri P, Choudhry A, Otero K, Adams M. 2020; Clavicle fractures: associated trauma and morbidity. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 13:53–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.08.020. PMID: 33717875. PMCID: PMC7919969.
Article
3. VanBeek C, Boselli KJ, Cadet ER, Ahmad CS, Levine WN. 2011; Precontoured plating of clavicle fractures: decreased hardware-related complications? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 469:3337–43. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-1868-0. PMID: 21416203. PMCID: PMC3210289.
Article
4. Andersen JR, Willis MP, Nelson R, Mighell MA. 2011; Precontoured superior locked plating of distal clavicle fractures: a new strategy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 469:3344–50. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-2009-5. PMID: 21866422. PMCID: PMC3210290.
Article
5. Kabak S, Halici M, Tuncel M, Avsarogullari L, Karaoglu S. 2004; Treatment of midclavicular nonunion: comparison of dynamic compression plating and low-contact dynamic compression plating techniques. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 13:396–403. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.01.033. PMID: 15220879.
Article
6. Collinge C, Devinney S, Herscovici D, DiPasquale T, Sanders R. 2006; Anterior-inferior plate fixation of middle-third fractures and nonunions of the clavicle. J Orthop Trauma. 20:680–6. DOI: 10.1097/01.bot.0000249434.57571.29. PMID: 17106378.
Article
7. Coupe BD, Wimhurst JA, Indar R, Calder DA, Patel AD. 2005; A new approach for plate fixation of midshaft clavicular fractures. Injury. 36:1166–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2005.03.007. PMID: 16076467.
Article
8. Hulsmans MH, van Heijl M, Houwert RM, Hammacher ER, Meylaerts SA, Verhofstad MH, Dijkgraaf MG, Verleisdonk EJ. 2017; High irritation and removal rates after plate or nail fixation in patients with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 475:532–9. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-5113-8. PMID: 27830484. PMCID: PMC5213945.
Article
9. Fontana AD, Hoyen HA, Blauth M, Galm A, Schweizer M, Raas C, Jaeger M, Jiang C, Nijs S, Lambert S. 2020; The variance of clavicular surface morphology is predictable: an analysis of dependent and independent metadata variables. JSES Int. 4:413–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.05.004. PMID: 32939461. PMCID: PMC7479165.
Article
10. Malhas AM, Skarparis YG, Sripada S, Soames RW, Jariwala AC. 2016; How well do contoured superior midshaft clavicle plates fit the clavicle? A cadaveric study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 25:954–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.10.020. PMID: 26776945.
Article
11. Huang JI, Toogood P, Chen MR, Wilber JH, Cooperman DR. 2007; Clavicular anatomy and the applicability of precontoured plates. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 89:2260–5. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200710000-00022. PMID: 17908904.
Article
12. Fang CX, Liu R, Yee DKH, Chau J, Lau TW, Chan R, Woo SB, Wong TM, Fang E, Leung F. 2020; Comparison of radiological and clinical outcomes, complications, and implant removals in anatomically pre-contoured clavicle plates versus reconstruction plates - a propensity score matched retrospective cohort study of 106 patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 21:413. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03445-5. PMID: 32600366. PMCID: PMC7325088. PMID: e8c3cc91e3e44f7095ad674a789b0b8f.
Article
13. Zhao B, Zhao W, Assan I, Bi R. 2022; Conoid tubercle angle: attention should be paid to supraclavicular plate fixation. J Orthop Surg Res. 17:105. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03003-w. PMID: 35183198. PMCID: PMC8858468. PMID: d5262b19db3b4d3282ce22971dea8290.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ACB
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr