Anesth Pain Med.  2023 Jul;18(3):260-269. 10.17085/apm.23016.

Appropriateness of the anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for Koreans to measure preoperative anxiety and the effect of preoperative anxiety on postoperative quality of recovery

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
  • 2Department of Medical Education, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea

Abstract

Background
The reliability and validity of the anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for Koreans (K-HADS-A) has not been studied in Korean surgical patients. This study aimed to validate the usefulness of K-HADS-A for measuring preoperative anxiety in Korean surgical patients. Additionally, the effect of preoperative anxiety on postoperative quality of recovery was evaluated.
Methods
Preoperative anxiety in 126 inpatients with planned elective surgery was measured using the K-HADS-A. The postoperative quality of recovery was measured using the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15. The validity and reliability of the K-HADS-A were evaluated. The differences in quality of recovery on the first and seventh day postoperatively were then compared between the anxious and non-anxious groups.
Results
There was a statistical correlation between the K-HADS-A and Anxiety Likert Scale. The goodness-of-fit indices of the structural equation model showed how well the data from the K-HADS-A match their concept. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value was 0.848, and the P value of Bartlett’s test of sphericity was < 0.001. Cronbach’s alpha was high at 0.872. The K-HADS-A had an acceptable level of validity and reliability. Postoperative quality of recovery was significantly lower in the anxious group (postoperative day 1: t = 2.058, P = 0.042; postoperative day 7: t = 3.430, P = 0.002).
Conclusions
The K-HADS-A is an acceptable tool for appropriately assessing preoperative anxiety in Korean surgical patients. Assessing preoperative anxiety is valuable, because preoperative anxiety affects the postoperative quality of mental and physical recovery.

Keyword

Preoperative anxiety; Postoperative recovery; Surgery; Anesthesia; K-HADS-A; QoR-15K

Figure

  • Fig. 1. CONSORT flow diagram. CONSORT: Consolidated Standards for Reporting of Trials, QoR-15K: Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15.

  • Fig. 2. Structural equation model for Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for Koreans (K-HADS-A). Latent variables are theoretical concepts that are not directly observed, and this refers to what K-HADS-A represents. Meanwhile, observed variables are directly measured variables and represent the seven questions of the K-HADS-A. Given that the seven items in the K-HADS-A measure a single latent variable, the modeling focuses on the relationship between these items and the latent variable.


Reference

1. Mavridou P, Dimitriou V, Manataki A, Arnaoutoglou E, Papadopoulos G. Patient’s anxiety and fear of anesthesia: effect of gender, age, education, and previous experience of anesthesia. A survey of 400 patients. J Anesth. 2013; 27:104–8.
Article
2. Maranets I, Kain ZN. Preoperative anxiety and intraoperative anesthetic requirements. Anesth Analg. 1999; 89:1346–51.
Article
3. Klopfenstein CE, Forster A, Van Gessel E. Anesthetic assessment in an outpatient consultation clinic reduces preoperative anxiety. Can J Anaesth. 2000; 47:511–5.
Article
4. Segal DL. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV-TR). The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. 2010; 1-3.
5. Woldegerima YB, Fitwi GL, Yimer HT, Hailekiros AG. Prevalence and factors associated with preoperative anxiety among elective surgical patients at University of Gondar Hospital. Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia, 2017. A cross-sectional study. Int J Surg Open. 2018; 10:21–9.
Article
6. Balasubramaniyan N, Rayapati DK, Puttiah RH, Tavane P, Singh SE, Rangan V, et al. Evaluation of anxiety induced cardiovascular response in known hypertensive patients undergoing exodontia-a prospective study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016; 10:ZC123–7.
7. Ip HYV, Abrishami A, Peng PW, Wong J, Chung F. Predictors of postoperative pain and analgesic consumption: a qualitative systematic review. Anesthesiology. 2009; 111:657–77.
8. Kalkman C, Visser K, Moen J, Bonsel G, Grobbee D, Moons K. Preoperative prediction of severe postoperative pain. Pain. 2003; 105:415–23.
Article
9. Rymaszewska J, Kiejna A, Hadryś T. Depression and anxiety in coronary artery bypass grafting patients. Eur Psychiatry. 2003; 18:155–60.
Article
10. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983; 67:361–70.
Article
11. Oh SM, Min KJ, Park DB. A study on the standardization of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for Koreans. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 1999; 38:289–96.
12. Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Page GG, Marucha PT, MacCallum RC, Glaser R. Psychological influences on surgical recovery: perspectives from psychoneuroimmunology. Am Psychol. 1998; 53:1209–18.
Article
13. Kopp M, Bonatti H, Haller C, Rumpold G, Söllner W, Holzner B, et al. Life satisfaction and active coping style are important predictors of recovery from surgery. J Psychosom Res. 2003; 55:371–7.
Article
14. Székely A, Balog P, Benkö E, Breuer T, Székely J, Kertai MD, et al. Anxiety predicts mortality and morbidity after coronary artery and valve surgery—a 4-year follow-up study. Psychosom Med. 2007; 69:625–31.
Article
15. Myles PS, Hunt JO, Nightingale CE, Fletcher H, Beh T, Tanil D, et al. Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults. Anesth Analg. 1999; 88:83–90.
Article
16. Stark PA, Myles PS, Burke JA. Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15. Anesthesiology. 2013; 118:1332–40.
17. Lee JH, Ki M, Choi S, Woo CJ, Kim D, Lim H, et al. Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2021; 74:142–9.
Article
18. Lee JH, Kim D, Seo D, Son JS, Kim DC. Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-40 questionnaire. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2018; 71:467–75.
Article
19. Berth H, Petrowski K, Balck F. The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS)-the first trial of a German version. Psychosoc Med. 2007; 4:Doc01.
20. Amit K, Prakash K, Alok R. Assessment of anxiety in surgical patients: an observational study. Anesth Essays Res. 2019; 13:503–8.
21. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociol Methods Res. 1992; 21:230–58.
Article
22. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990; 107:238–46.
Article
23. Lisa SE, Kate WT, Bunmi O. Measurement of anxious traits: a contemporary review and synthesis. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2012; 25:647–66.
Article
24. Myles PS, Myles DB, Galagher W, Chew C, MacDonald N, Dennis A. Minimal clinically important difference for three quality of recovery scales. Anesthesiology. 2016; 125:39–45.
Article
25. De Groot KI, Boeke S, Van Den Berge HJ, Duivenvoorden HJ, Bonke B, Passchier J. The influence of psychological variables on postoperative anxiety and physical complaints in patients undergoing lumbar surgery. Pain. 1997; 69:19–25.
Article
Full Text Links
  • APM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr