Korean J Pain.  2023 Oct;36(4):450-457. 10.3344/kjp.23200.

Comparison of the efficacy of genicular nerve phenol neurolysis and radiofrequency ablation for pain management in patients with knee osteoarthritis

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Algology, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

Abstract

Background
Genicular nerve neurolysis with phenol and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are two interventional techniques for treating chronic refractory knee osteoarthritis (KOA) pain. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and adverse effects of both techniques.
Methods
Sixty-four patients responding to diagnostic blockade of the superior medial, superior lateral, and inferior medial genicular nerve under ultrasound guidance were randomly divided into two groups: Group P (2 mL phenol for each genicular nerve) and Group R (RFA 80°C for 60 seconds for each genicular nerve). The numeric rating scale (NRS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions.
Results
RFA and phenol neurolysis of the genicular nerves provided effective analgesia within groups at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months compared to baseline. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of NRS and WOMAC scores at all measurement times. At the 3rd month follow-up, 50% or more pain relief was observed in 53.1% of patients in Group P and 50% of patients in Group R. The rate of transient paresthesia was 34.4% in Group P and 6.3% in Group R, and this was significantly higher in Group P.
Conclusions
Neurolysis of the genicular nerves with both RFA and phenol is effective in the management of KOA pain. Phenol may be a good alternative to RFA. Further studies are needed on issues such as dose adjustment to prevent transient paresthesia response.

Keyword

Analgesia; Chronic Pain; Nerve Block; Neuritis; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Paresthesia; Phenol; Radiofrequency Ablation

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Probe placement for superior medial genicular nerve, superior lateral genicular nerve, and inferior medial genicular nerve. SMGA: superior medial genicular artery, SLGA: superior lateral genicular artery, IMGA: inferior medial genicular artery.

  • Fig. 2 Patients flow chart.

  • Fig. 3 (A) Numeric rating scale (NRS) and (B) Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores of the groups before and after the treatment. The NRS is shown as the median (min-max range), and WOMAC score is shown as the mean ± standard deviation. aP < 0.001 for NRS-1st week, 1st month and 3rd month compared to NRS-baseline. bP < 0.001 for WOMAC-1st week, WOMAC-1st month and WOMAC-3rd month compared to WOMAC-baseline.


Cited by  2 articles

Optimizing genicular nerve chemical ablation
Andrés Rocha-Romero, Tony Kwun Tung Ng, King Hei Stanley Lam
Korean J Pain. 2024;37(3):275-279.    doi: 10.3344/kjp.24021.

Is conventional radiofrequency ablation of the superolateral branch, one of the three genicular nerves targeted as standard, necessary or not? A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
Osman Albayrak, Canan Sanal Toprak, Osman Hakan Gunduz, Savas Sencan
Korean J Pain. 2024;37(3):264-274.    doi: 10.3344/kjp.24098.


Reference

1. Neogi T. 2013; The epidemiology and impact of pain in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 21:1145–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.03.018. PMID: 23973124. PMCID: PMC3753584.
Article
2. Haider MZ, Bhuiyan R, Ahmed S, Zahid-Al-Quadir A, Choudhury MR, Haq SA, et al. 2022; Risk factors of knee osteoarthritis in Bangladeshi adults: a national survey. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 23:333. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05253-5. PMID: 35395747. PMCID: PMC8991964. PMID: a54da1b08f0548bbb9f781b0aec68291.
Article
3. Risso RC, Ferraro LHC, Nouer Frederico T, Peng PWH, Luzo MV, Debieux P, et al. 2021; Chemical ablation of genicular nerve with phenol for pain relief in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a prospective study. Pain Pract. 21:438–44. DOI: 10.1111/papr.12972. PMID: 33277760.
Article
4. Conger A, Gililland J, Anderson L, Pelt CE, Peters C, McCormick ZL. 2021; Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of painful knee osteoarthritis: current evidence and future directions. Pain Med. 22(Suppl 1):S20–3. DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnab129. PMID: 34308957.
Article
5. Choi WJ, Hwang SJ, Song JG, Leem JG, Kang YU, Park PH, et al. 2011; Radiofrequency treatment relieves chronic knee osteoarthritis pain: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Pain. 152:481–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.029. PMID: 21055873.
Article
6. Guven Kose S, Kirac Unal Z, Kose HC, Celikel F, Akkaya OT. 2023; Ultrasound-guided genicular nerve radiofrequency treatment: prospective randomized comparative trial of a 3-nerve protocol versus a 5-nerve protocol. Pain Med. 24:758–67. DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnad025. PMID: 36869680.
Article
7. Salehi R, Valizadeh L, Negahban H, Karimi M, Goharpey S, Shahali S. 2023; The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis, Lequesne Algofunctional index, Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale-short form, and Visual Analogue Scale in patients with knee osteoarthritis: responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences. Disabil Rehabil. 45:2185–91. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2084776. PMID: 35695001.
Article
8. Sarı S, Aydın ON, Turan Y, Özlülerden P, Efe U, Kurt Ömürlü İ. 2018; Which one is more effective for the clinical treatment of chronic pain in knee osteoarthritis: radiofrequency neurotomy of the genicular nerves or intra-articular injection? Int J Rheum Dis. 21:1772–8. DOI: 10.1111/1756-185X.12925. PMID: 27515095.
Article
9. Fogarty AE, Burnham T, Kuo K, Tate Q, Sperry BP, Cheney C, et al. 2022; The effectiveness of fluoroscopically guided genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of chronic knee pain due to osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 101:482–92. DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001813. PMID: 35006653.
Article
10. Cosman ER Jr, Dolensky JR, Hoffman RA. 2014; Factors that affect radiofrequency heat lesion size. Pain Med. 15:2020–36. DOI: 10.1111/pme.12566. PMID: 25312825.
Article
11. Cushman DM, Monson N, Conger A, Kendall RW, Henrie AM, McCormick ZL. 2019; Use of 0.5 mL and 1.0 mL of local anesthetic for genicular nerve blocks. Pain Med. 20:1049–52. DOI: 10.1093/pm/pny277. PMID: 30590798.
Article
12. González Sotelo V, Maculé F, Minguell J, Bergé R, Franco C, Sala-Blanch X. 2017; Ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block for pain control after total knee replacement: preliminary case series and technical note. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 64:568–76. DOI: 10.1016/j.redar.2017.04.001. PMID: 28554709.
Article
13. Walega DR, McCormick ZL. 2018; Chemical neurolysis of the genicular nerves for chronic knee pain: reviving an old dog and an old trick. Pain Med. 19:1882–4. DOI: 10.1093/pm/pny023. PMID: 29514315.
Article
14. Kidd VD, Strum SR, Strum DS, Shah J. 2019; Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation for painful knee arthritis: the why and the how. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 9:e10. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00016. PMID: 31333900. PMCID: PMC6635137.
Article
15. D'Souza RS, Warner NS. 2023. Phenol nerve block. StatPearls Publishing;DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-28753-4_101374.
16. Dass RM, Kim E, Kim HK, Lee JY, Lee HJ, Rhee SJ. 2019; Alcohol neurolysis of genicular nerve for chronic knee pain. Korean J Pain. 32:223–7. DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2019.32.3.223. PMID: 31257831. PMCID: PMC6615444.
Article
17. Tan YL, Neo EJR, Wee TC. 2022; Ultrasound-guided genicular nerve blockade with pharmacological agents for chronic knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Pain Physician. 25:E489–502. PMID: 35793174.
18. Tran J, Peng PWH, Lam K, Baig E, Agur AMR, Gofeld M. 2018; Anatomical study of the innervation of anterior knee joint capsule: implication for image-guided intervention. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 43:407–14. DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000778. PMID: 29557887.
19. Kose SG, Kose HC, Celikel F, Akkaya OT. 2022; Predictive factors associated with successful response to utrasound guided genicular radiofrequency ablation. Korean J Pain. 35:447–57. DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2022.35.4.447. PMID: 36175344. PMCID: PMC9530687.
Article
20. Tran J, Peng P, Agur A. 2020; Evaluation of nerve capture using classical landmarks for genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation: 3D cadaveric study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 45:898–906. DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101894. PMID: 32928998.
Article
21. Kim DH, Lee MS, Lee S, Yoon SH, Shin JW, Choi SS. 2019; A prospective randomized comparison of the efficacy of ultrasound- vs fluoroscopy-guided genicular nerve block for chronic knee osteoarthritis. Pain Physician. 22:139–46. DOI: 10.36076/ppj/2019.22.139. PMID: 30921977.
22. Sarı S, Aydın ON, Turan Y, Şen S, Özlülerden P, Ömürlü İK, et al. 2017; Which imaging method should be used for genicular nerve radio frequency thermocoagulation in chronic knee osteoarthritis? J Clin Monit Comput. 31:797–803. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-016-9886-9. PMID: 27142099.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr