Investig Clin Urol.  2023 Sep;64(5):474-479. 10.4111/icu.20220395.

Radiation exposure during different percutaneous renal puncture techniques: A YAU endourology & urolithiasis study

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Urology, Marmara University, School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye
  • 2Young Academic Urologists, Endourology and Urolithiasis Working Party, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, Netherlands
  • 3Department of Radiation Oncology, Unit of Radiation Health, Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye
  • 4Department of Radiology, Unit of Radiation Health, Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye
  • 5Department of Urology, NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton University Hospital, Southampton, UK
  • 6Department of Urology, Fundación Puigvert. Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  • 7European Association of Urology Section of Uro-Technology, Arnhem, Netherlands
  • 8European Association of Urology Section of Urolithiasis (EULIS), Arnhem, Netherlands
  • 9European School of Urology (ESU), Arnhem, Netherlands

Abstract

Purpose
Radiation exposure is affected by C-arm fluoroscopy device positioning during percutaneous renal puncture. Our aim was to compare the exposure of surgeon's lens, hand and chest with a fluoroscopy protocol replicated in different C-arm positions.
Materials and Methods
A standardized fluoroscopy protocol was created using water-equivalent solid phantoms to replicate a surgeon and patient. 111 mGy radiation (360 s) was applied in standard fluoroscopy mode (91 kVp, 2.7 mA/mAs). Dosimeters were placed on lens, chest and hand of surgeon and patient phantom models. 7 different C-arm positions were created: 0°, mediolateral (ML) +90°, ML -90°, ML +30°, ML -15°, craniocaudal (CC) +30°, CC +15°. Measurements were evaluated separately for different positions.
Results
The highest radiation exposure was measured on patient dosimeter (2.97 mSv). The highest exposure on surgeon was recorded on finger dosimeter in all C-arm positions; highest dose was recorded in ML +90° position (2.88 mSv). In finger dosimeters, lowest exposure was recorded in 0° position (0.51 mSv). The lowest exposure of all positions was measured in chest dosimeter in ML -90° position (0.24 mSv).
Conclusions
In positions where X-ray generator of the C-arm was facing towards the surgeon, radiation exposure measured in all dosimeters was higher compared to positions where the generator was facing away. The hand radiation exposure in all positions was higher than chest and lens. Special care must be taken to avoid facing the X-ray generator tube and hands should be as wellprotected as chest and eyes with special protective gear.

Keyword

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Radiation exposure
Full Text Links
  • ICU
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr