J Korean Med Sci.  2023 Sep;38(35):e286. 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e286.

Prepregnancy Glucose Levels Within Normal Range and Its Impact on Obstetric Complications in Subsequent Pregnancy: A Population Cohort Study

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Background
We sought to identify the influence of prepregnancy glucose levels on obstetric complications in subsequent pregnancy.
Methods
Women in Republic of Korea who had given birth between January 1st, 2007 and December 31st, 2010 were enrolled. The database of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service and data from a national health screening program for infants and children were used. Subjects were divided into seven groups according to their fasting glucose levels.
Results
59,619 women were included for analysis, and 10.4%, 13.7%, 19.1%, 21.5%, 16.0%, 11.6%, and 7.5% women had glucose levels of < 75, 75–79, 80–84, 85–89, 90–94, 95–100 and > 100 mg/dL. Each 5 mg/dL increase in prepregnancy fasting glucose levels was associated with increased risk of gestational diabetes and macrosomia in subsequent pregnancy. Adjusted risk ratio for gestational diabetes per standard deviation prepregnancy glucose > 100 mg/dL was 2.015 (95% confidence interval, 1.649–2.462) and for macrosomia an adjusted risk ratio 1.389 (95% confidence interval, 1.147–1.682).
Conclusion
Higher prepregnancy glucose level within normal range was related to gestational diabetes and macrosomia in following pregnancy. Our results may aid in the identification of women at future risk of obstetric complications and may guide to stratify women into normal and intensified care. Tweetable abstract Higher prepregnancy glucose in normal range is associated with gestational diabetes and macrosomia.

Keyword

Prepregnancy; Glucose; Gestational Diabetes; Macrosomia

Reference

1. HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group;. Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Dyer AR, Trimble ER, Chaovarindr U, et al. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358(19):1991–2002. PMID: 18463375.
Article
2. Kim M. Prediction and prevention of large for gestational age in gestational diabetes mellitus. Korean J Perinatol. 2016; 27(1):8–14.
3. Harder T, Rodekamp E, Schellong K, Dudenhausen JW, Plagemann A. Birth weight and subsequent risk of type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2007; 165(8):849–857. PMID: 17215379.
4. Riskin-Mashiah S, Damti A, Younes G, Auslender R. First trimester fasting hyperglycemia as a predictor for the development of gestational diabetes mellitus. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010; 152(2):163–167. PMID: 20579799.
5. Lee KH, Han YJ, Chung JH, Kim MY, Ryu HM, Kim JH, et al. Treatment of gestational diabetes diagnosed by the IADPSG criteria decreases excessive fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020; 63(1):19–26. PMID: 31970124.
6. Hao M, Lin L. Fasting plasma glucose and body mass index during the first trimester of pregnancy as predictors of gestational diabetes mellitus in a Chinese population. Endocr J. 2017; 64(5):561–569. PMID: 28420856.
7. Sesmilo G, Prats P, Garcia S, Rodríguez I, Rodríguez-Melcón A, Berges I, et al. First-trimester fasting glycemia as a predictor of gestational diabetes (GDM) and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Acta Diabetol. 2020; 57(6):697–703. PMID: 31984438.
8. Landon MB, Spong CY, Thom E, Carpenter MW, Ramin SM, Casey B, et al. A multicenter, randomized trial of treatment for mild gestational diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(14):1339–1348. PMID: 19797280.
9. Oh T, Jang HC. Gestational diabetes mellitus: diagnosis and glycemic control. J Korean Diabetes. 2020; 21(2):69–74.
Article
10. Salman L, Arbib N, Shmueli A, Krispin E, Wiznitzer A, Hadar E. The association between pre-pregnancy impaired fasting glucose and adverse perinatal outcome. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018; 140:148–153. PMID: 29601914.
Article
11. Hu CY, Li FL, Jiang W, Hua XG, Zhang XJ. Pre-pregnancy health status and risk of preterm birth: a large, Chinese, rural, population-based study. Med Sci Monit. 2018; 24:4718–4727. PMID: 29982265.
Article
12. Tang J, Zhu X, Li M, Huang D, Zhao Q. The impact of maternal prepregnancy impaired fasting glucose on preterm birth and large for gestational age: a large population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 222(3):265.e1–265.19.
Article
13. Lee SH, Yu J, Han K, Lee SW, You SY, Kim HS, et al. Predicting the risk of insulin-requiring gestational diabetes before pregnancy: a model generated from a nationwide population-based cohort study in Korea. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2023; 38(1):129–138. PMID: 36702473.
Article
14. Innes KE, Byers TE, Marshall JA, Barón A, Orleans M, Hamman RF. Association of a woman’s own birth weight with subsequent risk for gestational diabetes. JAMA. 2002; 287(19):2534–2541. PMID: 12020334.
Article
15. Turner N, Robker RL. Developmental programming of obesity and insulin resistance: does mitochondrial dysfunction in oocytes play a role? Mol Hum Reprod. 2015; 21(1):23–30. PMID: 24923276.
Article
16. Brown J, Alwan NA, West J, Brown S, McKinlay CJ, Farrar D, et al. Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of women with gestational diabetes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 5(5):CD011970. PMID: 28472859.
Article
17. Song C, Li J, Leng J, Ma RC, Yang X. Lifestyle intervention can reduce the risk of gestational diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obes Rev. 2016; 17(10):960–969. PMID: 27417680.
Article
18. Ko JM, Lee JK. Effects of a coaching program on comprehensive lifestyle modification for women with gestational diabetes mellitus. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2014; 44(6):672–681. PMID: 25608545.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr