J Korean Med Sci.  2023 Sep;38(35):e266. 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e266.

Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Gout Impact Scale

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
  • 3Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
  • 4Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
  • 5Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Background
The Gout Impact Scale (GIS), part of the Gout Assessment Questionnaire 2.0, measures gout-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL). This study aimed to translate the GIS into Korean and validate the Korean version (K-GIS) using generic HRQOL measures.
Methods
The GIS was translated into Korean and back-translated into English. We asked patients aged 18 years or older who met the 2015 gout classification criteria to fill out the questionnaires (from January 2022 to June 2022); the K-GIS (5 scales [0–100 scores each]), along with the Korean version of Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ-5D). We investigated the internal consistency, construct validity, and discriminative validity for gout characteristics of K-GIS. The K-GIS form was administrated to patients 4 weeks later to assess the test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
Results
One hundred patients completed the questionnaire. The mean ± standard deviation age of the patients was 53.0 ± 15.1 years, and 99.0% of the patients were men. All scales had high degree of internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.59 to 0.96) and test-retest reliability (n = 18, ICC = 0.83 to 0.94, all P < 0.001), except for unmet gout treatment needs. Weak-to-moderate correlations were observed between the K-GIS scales and HAQ or EQ-5D (r = 0.21 to 0.46). The K-GIS scores were significantly higher in the presence of bone erosion, absence of urate-lowering therapy, serum urate levels > 6 mg/dL, frequent gout flares in the past year, and fewer comorbidities. In contrast, neither the HAQ nor the EQ-5D could discern these subsets of patients.
Conclusion
The K-GIS is a reliable and valid HRQOL measure for patients with gout. Higher K-GIS scores were associated with clinical characteristics leading to unfavorable outcomes, which were not demonstrated by the HAQ and EQ-5D.

Keyword

Gout; Gout Impact Scale; Health-Related Quality of Life; Patient-Reported Outcome

Reference

1. Roddy E, Doherty M. Epidemiology of gout. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010; 12(6):223. PMID: 21205285.
2. Sundy JS, Baraf HS, Yood RA, Edwards NL, Gutierrez-Urena SR, Treadwell EL, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of pegloticase for the treatment of chronic gout in patients refractory to conventional treatment: two randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2011; 306(7):711–720. PMID: 21846852.
Article
3. Doherty M, Jenkins W, Richardson H, Sarmanova A, Abhishek A, Ashton D, et al. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of nurse-led care involving education and engagement of patients and a treat-to-target urate-lowering strategy versus usual care for gout: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018; 392(10156):1403–1412. PMID: 30343856.
Article
4. Aung T, Myung G, FitzGerald JD. Treatment approaches and adherence to urate-lowering therapy for patients with gout. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017; 11:795–800. PMID: 28458524.
Article
5. Singh JA, Taylor WJ, Simon LS, Khanna PP, Stamp LK, McQueen FM, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in chronic gout: a report from OMERACT 10. J Rheumatol. 2011; 38(7):1452–1457. PMID: 21724715.
Article
6. Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, Holman HR. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1980; 23(2):137–145. PMID: 7362664.
Article
7. Mazur W, Kupiainen H, Pitkäniemi J, Kilpeläinen M, Sintonen H, Lindqvist A, et al. Comparison between the disease-specific Airways Questionnaire 20 and the generic 15D instruments in COPD. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011; 9(1):4. PMID: 21235818.
Article
8. Roddy E, Zhang W, Doherty M. Is gout associated with reduced quality of life? A case-control study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007; 46(9):1441–1444. PMID: 17586863.
Article
9. Lee SJ, Hirsch JD, Terkeltaub R, Khanna D, Singh JA, Sarkin A, et al. Perceptions of disease and health-related quality of life among patients with gout. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009; 48(5):582–586. PMID: 19307257.
Article
10. Singh JA, Strand V. Gout is associated with more comorbidities, poorer health-related quality of life and higher healthcare utilisation in US veterans. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008; 67(9):1310–1316. PMID: 18178692.
Article
11. Proudman C, Lester SE, Gonzalez-Chica DA, Gill TK, Dalbeth N, Hill CL. Gout, flares, and allopurinol use: a population-based study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019; 21(1):132. PMID: 31151457.
Article
12. Becker MA, Schumacher HR, Benjamin KL, Gorevic P, Greenwald M, Fessel J, et al. Quality of life and disability in patients with treatment-failure gout. J Rheumatol. 2009; 36(5):1041–1048. PMID: 19332629.
Article
13. Colwell HH, Hunt BJ, Pasta DJ, Palo WA, Mathias SD, Joseph-Ridge N. Gout Assessment Questionnaire: initial results of reliability, validity and responsiveness. Int J Clin Pract. 2006; 60(10):1210–1217. PMID: 16911575.
Article
14. Hirsch JD, Lee SJ, Terkeltaub R, Khanna D, Singh J, Sarkin A, et al. Evaluation of an instrument assessing influence of gout on health-related quality of life. J Rheumatol. 2008; 35(12):2406–2414. PMID: 18925685.
Article
15. Spaetgens B, van der Linden S, Boonen A. The Gout Assessment Questionnaire 2.0: cross-cultural translation into Dutch, aspects of validity and linking to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014; 53(4):678–685. PMID: 24357808.
Article
16. Phrintrakul N, Wongthanee A, Kasitanon N, Louthrenoo W. Translation, internal consistency, reliability and validity of the Thai version of Gout Assessment Questionnaire version 2.0 (GAQ 2.0). Clin Rheumatol. 2022; 41(7):2129–2141. PMID: 35353262.
Article
17. Pao CH, Ko Y. An assessment of the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Gout Impact Scale. Curr Med Res Opin. 2020; 36(1):17–21. PMID: 31476916.
Article
18. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(24):3186–3191. PMID: 11124735.
Article
19. Hirsch JD, Terkeltaub R, Khanna D, Singh J, Sarkin A, Shieh M, et al. Gout disease-specific quality of life and the association with gout characteristics. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2010; 2010:1–8. PMID: 21686040.
Article
20. La-Crette J, Jenkins W, Fernandes G, Valdes AM, Doherty M, Abhishek A. First validation of the gout activity score against gout impact scale in a primary care based gout cohort. Joint Bone Spine. 2018; 85(3):323–325. PMID: 28528279.
Article
21. Neogi T, Jansen TL, Dalbeth N, Fransen J, Schumacher HR, Berendsen D, et al. 2015 Gout Classification Criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67(10):2557–2568. PMID: 26352873.
Article
22. Bae SC, Cook EF, Kim SY. Psychometric evaluation of a Korean Health Assessment Questionnaire for clinical research. J Rheumatol. 1998; 25(10):1975–1979. PMID: 9779853.
23. Kim MH, Cho YS, Uhm WS, Kim S, Bae SC. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the EQ-5D in patients with rheumatic diseases. Qual Life Res. 2005; 14(5):1401–1406. PMID: 16047514.
Article
24. Bruce B, Fries JF. The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire: dimensions and practical applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003; 1(1):20. PMID: 12831398.
25. Lee YK, Nam HS, Chuang LH, Kim KY, Yang HK, Kwon IS, et al. South Korean time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states: modeling with observed values for 101 health states. Value Health. 2009; 12(8):1187–1193. PMID: 19659703.
Article
26. de Vet HC, Mokkink LB, Mosmuller DG, Terwee CB. Spearman-Brown prophecy formula and Cronbach’s alpha: different faces of reliability and opportunities for new applications. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017; 85:45–49. PMID: 28342902.
Article
27. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Pearson/Prentice Hall;2009.
28. Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. London, UK: Psychology Press;2014.
29. Rasmussen AA, Wiggers H, Jensen M, Berg SK, Rasmussen TB, Borregaard B, et al. Patient-reported outcomes and medication adherence in patients with heart failure. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2021; 7(4):287–295. PMID: 32761093.
Article
30. Hershman DL, Neugut AI, Moseley A, Arnold KB, Gralow JR, Henry NL, et al. Patient-reported outcomes and long-term nonadherence to aromatase inhibitors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021; 113(8):989–996. PMID: 33629114.
Article
31. Chung MK, Kim SS, Cheon YH, Hong SJ, Choi HJ, Seo MR, et al. Patient perspectives and preferences regarding gout and gout management: impact on adherence. J Korean Med Sci. 2021; 36(32):e208. PMID: 34402226.
Article
32. Topless R, Noorbaloochi S, Merriman TR, Singh JA. Change in serum urate level with urate-lowering therapy initiation associates in the immediate term with patient-reported outcomes in people with gout. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2022; 56:152057. PMID: 35835008.
Article
33. Alvarado-de la Barrera C, López-López CO, Álvarez-Hernández E, Peláez-Ballestas I, Gómez-Ruiz C, Burgos-Vargas R, et al. Are target urate and remission possible in severe gout? A five-year cohort study. J Rheumatol. 2020; 47(1):132–139. PMID: 31043541.
Article
34. Xuan J, Kirchdoerfer LJ, Boyer JG, Norwood GJ. Effects of comorbidity on health-related quality-of-life scores: an analysis of clinical trial data. Clin Ther. 1999; 21(2):383–403. PMID: 10211540.
Article
35. Khanna D, Sarkin AJ, Khanna PP, Shieh MM, Kavanaugh AF, Terkeltaub RA, et al. Minimally important differences of the gout impact scale in a randomized controlled trial. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011; 50(7):1331–1336. PMID: 21372003.
Article
36. Alvarez-Hernández E, Peláez-Ballestas I, Vázquez-Mellado J, Terán-Estrada L, Bernard-Medina AG, Espinoza J, et al. Validation of the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index in patients with gout. Arthritis Rheum. 2008; 59(5):665–669. PMID: 18438898.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr