J Korean Med Sci.  2023 Jul;38(30):e227. 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e227.

Comparative Analysis on the Policy Approaches in the National Dementia Plans of G7 Countries and Korea and Their Implementation

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Psychiatry, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Department of International Development Cooperation, Graduate school of Pan-pacific International Studies, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, Korea
  • 3Department of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
  • 4Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 5Department of Brain and Cognitive Science, Seoul National University College of Natural Sciences, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Background
The World Health Organization (WHO) proposed a global action plan for dementia and aimed to have 75% of their member states formulating National Dementia Plans (NDPs) by 2025. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) proposed the ten key objectives of dementia policy in 2015. Among previous studies on NDPs, few studies have investigated measures for proper implementation of NDPs. This study aimed to compare the implementation basis and specific action plans of NDPs between the G7 countries and South Korea.
Methods
We investigated the measures for proper implementation of the NDPs of G7 countries and South Korea. To compare the specific policy approaches, the seven action areas of the WHO action plan and the ten key objectives of dementia policy proposed by the OECD were integrated into 11 targets (prevention, diagnosis, awareness, caregiver support, appropriate environments, long-term care, health service, end-of-life care, care coordination, research and technology, information systems).
Results
Although most NDPs included specific action plans of the 11 targets, caregiver support, safe environments, healthcare services, and end-of-life care were lacking in some NDPs. For implementation, some countries reinforced the policy priority of their NDPs by timely updates, evaluation, legislations, or head-of-state leadership. However, only three countries had a legislative basis, and three countries included outcome measures in their latest NDP.
Conclusion
Effective measures for feasible implementation are needed. The WHO should promote not only the establishment of NDPs, but also their proper implementation.

Keyword

Dementia; Public Policy; National Dementia Plan; Dementia Policy; National Health Policy

Reference

1. Alzheimer’s Disease International. World Alzheimer report 2015: the global impact of dementia - an analysis of prevalence, incidence, cost and trends. Updated 2015. Accessed September 21, 2020. https://www.alzint.org/resource/world-alzheimer-report-2015/ .
2. GBD 2016 Dementia Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019; 18(1):88–106. PMID: 30497964.
3. OECD Health Policy Studies. Addressing dementia: the OECD response. Updated 2015. Accessed March 15, 2021. DOI: 10.1787/9789264231726-en.
4. World Health Organization. Global action plan on the public health response to dementia 2017–2025. Updated 2017. Accessed February 14, 2022. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/259615/9789241513487-eng.pdf;jsessionid=80A23EA097237DA6A82CDFEF47F41E05?sequence=1 .
5. World Health Organization. Global status report on the public health response to dementia. Updated 2021. Accessed February 21, 2022. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240033245 .
6. Alzheimer’s Disease International. National dementia action plans: examples for inspiration. Updated 2016. Accessed May 14, 2021. https://s3.amazonaws.com/external_clips/2630980/national-plans-examples-2017.pdf?1513704746 .
7. Alzheimer’s Disease International. From plan to impact: progress towards targets of the global action plan on dementia. Updated 2018. Accessed May 14, 2021. https://www.alz.co.uk/adi/pdf/from-plan-to-impact-2018.pdf .
8. Alzheimer’s Disease International. From plan to impact II: the urgent need for action. Updated 2019. Accessed August 14, 2021. https://www.alz.co.uk/adi/pdf/from-plan-to-impact-2019.pdf .
9. Global Coalition on Aging, Alzheimer’s Disease International. Dementia Innovation Readiness Index 2018. Updated 2018. Accessed May 14, 2021. https://globalcoalitiononaging.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/GCOA-Index2018-web-3.pdf .
10. Global Coalition on Aging, Alzheimer’s Disease International. Dementia innovation readiness index. Updated 2017. Accessed May 14, 2021. https://globalcoalitiononaging.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/gcoa-adi-dementia-index.pdf .
11. Seong SJ, Kim BN, Kim KW. National Dementia Plans of Group of Seven countries and South Korea based on international recommendations. JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(11):e2240027. PMID: 36326766.
12. Cahill S. WHO’s global action plan on the public health response to dementia: some challenges and opportunities. Aging Ment Health. 2020; 24(2):197–199. PMID: 30600688.
13. Alzheimer Europe. National dementia strategies: France. Updated 2022. Accessed November 8, 2022. https://www.alzheimer-europe.org/policy/national-dementia-strategies/france .
14. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. National plan to address Alzheimer’s disease: 2021 update. Updated 2021. Accessed March 15, 2022. https://aspe.hhs.gov/reports/national-plan-2021-update .
15. Government of Canada. Department of Justice. National strategy for Alzheimer's disease and other dementias act. Updated 2023. Accessed September 14, 2021. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/annualstatutes/2017_19/page-1.html .
16. Ministry of Health and Welfare. The 4th National Dementia Plan ('21–'25): creating a dementia-inclusive nation through social solidarity. Updated 2020. Accessed March 17, 2021. https://www.korea.kr/archive/expDocView.do?docId=39215 .
17. National Solidarity Fund for Autonomy. Plan: Alzheimer’s and related diseases 2008–2012. Updated 2008. Accessed October 13, 2021. https://www.cnsa.fr/documentation/plan_alzheimer_2008-2012-2.pdf .
18. Ministry of Social Affairs, Health, and Womens’ Rights. Plan maladies neurodegeneratives 2014–2019. Updated 2021. Accessed September 15, 2020. https://solidarites-sante.gouv.fr/soins-et-maladies/maladies/maladies-neurodegeneratives/article/les-grandes-lignes-du-plan-maladies-neuro-degeneratives-mnd-2014-2019 .
19. Department of Health and Social Care. Prime minister’s challenge on dementia 2020. Updated 2015. Accessed March 29, 2021. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/prime-ministers-challenge-on-dementia-2020 .
20. Alpérovitch A, Amouyel P, Dartigues JF, Ducimetière P, Mazoyer B, Ritchie K, et al. Epidemiological studies on aging in France: from the PAQUID study to the three-city study. C R Biol. 2002; 325(6):665–672. PMID: 12360853.
21. Han JW, Kim TH, Kwak KP, Kim K, Kim BJ, Kim SG, et al. Overview of the Korean longitudinal study on cognitive aging and dementia. Psychiatry Investig. 2018; 15(8):767–774.
22. Alzheimer Europe. National dementia strategies: Italy. Updated 2020. Accessed August 17, 2020. https://www.alzheimer-europe.org/policy/national-dementia-strategies/italy .
23. Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. New orange plan: toward development of dementia-friendly community for people with dementia. Updated 2020. Accessed August 17, 2020. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/file/06-Seisakujouhou-12300000-Roukenkyoku/nop1-2_3.pdf .
24. Awata S. New national health program against dementia in Japan: the medical center for dementia. Psychogeriatrics. 2010; 10(2):102–106. PMID: 20738815.
25. Lee SB. The Community Dementia Reassurance Center (Chime Ansim Center) in South Korea. Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2019; 23(2):43–44. PMID: 32743286.
26. Federal Ministry for Family, Seniors, Women and Youth. Nationale Demenzstrategie. Updated 2020. Accessed September 15, 2021. https://www.nationale-demenzstrategie.de/fileadmin/nds/pdf/2020-07-01_Nationale_Demenzsstrategie.pdf .
27. Public Health Agency of Canada. A dementia strategy for Canada: together we aspire. Updated 2019. Accessed August 17, 2021. https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/publications/diseases-conditions/dementia-strategy.html .
28. Ministry of Health and Welfare. The 3rd National dementia plan: living well with dementia in the community. Updated 2016. Accessed August 17, 2020. https://ansim.nid.or.kr/community/pds_view.aspx?bid=144 .
29. National Institute for Health Research. Join dementia research. Updated 2021. Accessed September 15, 2021. https://www.joindementiaresearch.nihr.ac.uk/ .
30. Le Duff F, Develay AE, Quetel J, Lafay P, Schück S, Pradier C, et al. 2008-2012 French Alzheimer plan: description of the national Alzheimer information system. J Alzheimers Dis. 2012; 29(4):891–902. PMID: 22366771.
31. ONC Tech Lab Standards Coordination. eLTSS home. Updated 2020. Accessed March 30, 2021. https://oncprojectracking.healthit.gov/wiki/display/TechLabSC/eLTSS+Home .
32. Federal Ministry for Family, Seniors, Women and Youth. Wegweiser Demenz. Updated 2021. Accessed October 13, 2021. https://www.wegweiser-demenz.de/ .
33. Schmachtenberg T, Monsees J, Hoffmann W, van den Berg N, Stentzel U, Thyrian JR. Comparing national dementia plans and strategies in Europe - is there a focus of care for people with dementia from a migration background? BMC Public Health. 2020; 20(1):784. PMID: 32456616.
34. Nakanishi M, Nakashima T, Shindo Y, Miyamoto Y, Gove D, Radbruch L, et al. An evaluation of palliative care contents in national dementia strategies in reference to the European Association for Palliative Care white paper. Int Psychogeriatr. 2015; 27(9):1551–1561. PMID: 25678323.
35. Kim YJ, An H, Kim B, Park YS, Kim KW. An international comparative study on driving regulations on people with dementia. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017; 56(3):1007–1014. PMID: 28059784.
36. Teper MH, Godard-Sebillotte C, Vedel I. Achieving the goals of dementia plans: a review of evidence-informed implementation strategies. World Health Popul. 2019; 18(1):37–46. PMID: 31917668.
37. Lin SY, Lewis FM. Dementia friendly, dementia capable, and dementia positive: concepts to prepare for the future. Gerontologist. 2015; 55(2):237–244. PMID: 26035599.
38. Nakanishi M, Nakashima T. Features of the Japanese national dementia strategy in comparison with international dementia policies: How should a national dementia policy interact with the public health- and social-care systems? Alzheimers Dement. 2014; 10(4):468–476.e3. PMID: 23954026.
39. Fortinsky RH, Downs M. Optimizing person-centered transitions in the dementia journey: a comparison of national dementia strategies. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014; 33(4):566–573. PMID: 24711316.
40. World Health Organization. Dementia: a public health priority. Updated 2012. Accessed March 30 2021. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/dementia-a-public-health-priority .
41. Alzheimer’s Disease International. From plan to impact III: maintaining dementia as a priority in unprecedented time. Updated 2020. Accessed December 21, 2021. https://www.alzint.org/u/from-plan-to-impact-2020.pdf .
42. Alzheimer’s Disease International. World Alzheimer report 2020: design, dignity, dementia: dementia-related design and the built environment. Updated 2020. Accessed March 26, 2021. https://www.alzint.org/resource/world-alzheimer-report-2020/ .
43. Sun F, Chima E, Wharton T, Iyengar V. National policy actions on dementia in the Americas and Asia-Pacific: consensus and challenges. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2020; 44(e2):
44. World Health Organization. Ageing and health. Accessed March 21, 2022. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health. Updated 2022.
45. U.K. Department of Health and Social Care. Dementia 2020 challenge: progress review. Updated 2019. Accessed November 19, 2021. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dementia-2020-challenge-progress-review .
46. Chow S, Chow R, Wan A, Lam HR, Taylor K, Bonin K, et al. National dementia strategies: what should Canada learn? Can Geriatr J. 2018; 21(2):173–209. PMID: 29977433.
47. Wright T, O’Connor S. Reviewing challenges and gaps in European and global dementia policy. J Public Ment Health. 2018; 17(4):157–167. PMID: 30581491.
48. Smith AE, Kamm GL, Lai S, Hull MJ, Baker JR, Milte R, et al. A RE-AIM analysis of an Intergenerational Dementia Education Program. Front Public Health. 2020; 8:248. PMID: 32719762.
49. Rosow K, Holzapfel A, Karlawish JH, Baumgart M, Bain LJ, Khachaturian AS. Countrywide strategic plans on Alzheimer’s disease: developing the framework for the international battle against Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011; 7(6):615–621. PMID: 22055978.
50. Engedal K, Laks J. Towards a Brazilian dementia plan? Lessons to be learned from Europe. Dement Neuropsychol. 2016; 10(2):74–78. PMID: 29213437.
51. Wortmann M. Importance of national plans for Alzheimer’s disease and dementia. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2013; 5(5):40. PMID: 24007939.
52. Edick C, Holland N, Ashbourne J, Elliott J, Stolee P. A review of Canadian and international dementia strategies. Healthc Manage Forum. 2017; 30(1):32–39. PMID: 28929900.
53. Barnes DE, Yaffe K. The projected effect of risk factor reduction on Alzheimer’s disease prevalence. Lancet Neurol. 2011; 10(9):819–828. PMID: 21775213.
54. Satizabal CL, Beiser AS, Chouraki V, Chêne G, Dufouil C, Seshadri S. Incidence of dementia over three decades in the Framingham heart study. N Engl J Med. 2016; 374(6):523–532. PMID: 26863354.
55. Farina MP, Zhang YS, Kim JK, Hayward MD, Crimmins EM. Trends in dementia prevalence, incidence, and mortality in the United States (2000–2016). J Aging Health. 2022; 34(1):100–108. PMID: 34233528.
56. Ding M, Qiu C, Rizzuto D, Grande G, Fratiglioni L. Tracing temporal trends in dementia incidence over 25 years in central Stockholm, Sweden. Alzheimers Dement. 2020; 16(5):770–778. PMID: 32270625.
57. Park JE, Kim BS, Kim KW, Hahm BJ, Sohn JH, Suk HW, et al. Decline in the incidence of all-cause and Alzheimer’s disease dementia: a 12-year-later rural Cohort study in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2019; 34(44):e293. PMID: 31726496.
58. Cho SJ, Kang JM. Dementia incidence on the decline in Korea: lessons learned and future directions. J Korean Med Sci. 2019; 34(44):e299. PMID: 31726497.
59. Kim YJ, Han JW, So YS, Seo JY, Kim KY, Kim KW. Prevalence and trends of dementia in Korea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Korean Med Sci. 2014; 29(7):903–912. PMID: 25045221.
60. Lee Y. The recent decline in prevalence of dementia in developed countries: implications for prevention in the Republic of Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2014; 29(7):913–918. PMID: 25045222.
61. Pan American Health Organization, World Health Organization. Strategy and plan of action on dementias in older persons. Updated 2018. Accessed March 29, 2021. https://www.paho.org/en/documents/cd54r11-strategy-and-plan-action-dementias-older-persons-resolution-2015 .
62. World Health Organization. Risk reduction of cognitive decline and dementia: WHO guidelines. Updated 2019. Accessed September 21, 2021. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/risk-reduction-of-cognitive-decline-and-dementia .
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr