Korean Med Educ Rev.  2023 Jun;25(2):174-183. 10.17496/kmer.23.007.

Student Engagement in Student Support System Reform: A Case Study

• Jang Y
• Kim SY
• Kang JY
• Kang D
• Kweon NH
• Kim GY
• Kim N
• Kim SH
• Kim S
• Kim J
• Kim CY
• Park S
• Park JY
• Park JS
• Lee GH
• Im B
• Yoon BY

• KMID: 2543627
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.17496/kmer.23.007

Abstract

Educational evaluation involves data collection and the analysis of various education-related factors to make decisions that improve educational quality. Systematic educational evaluation is essential for enhancing the quality of education. This study reports a case of student-conducted process evaluation of a medical school’s student support system and the procedure for devising improvement plans. Sixteen Inje University College of Medicine students participated in the Education Evaluation Committee (IUCM-EEC) to understand the educational improvement process as learners and actively achieve improvement. The Quality Improvement Committee of the Inje University College of Medicine (IUCM-QIC) decided to reform its student support system based on a previous educational evaluation in 2019. The evaluation of the student support system was conducted for 10 months in 2021 by the student subcommittee, under the guidance of the IUCM-EEC. The CIPP (context-input-process-product) evaluation model was used for a systematic evaluation. Accordingly, the subcommittee developed evaluation criteria and indicators, and analyzed relevant data collected from surveys and the previous literature. For further recommendations and revision ideas, the student subcommittee members interviewed faculty members from six other medical schools and also conducted a focus group interview with the dean and vice deans of IUCM. Finally, the student subcommittee submitted a report to the IUCM-QIC. Communication with various stakeholders is essential for a successful evaluation process. In this case, students, as key stakeholders in education, evaluated the student support system. Their active participation helped improve their understanding of the evaluation process.

Keyword

CIPP model; Educational evaluation; Stakeholders