Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.  2023 May;27(2):211-216. 10.14701/ahbps.22-098.

External pancreatic ductal stenting in minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: How to do it?

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India
  • 2Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Siksha O Anusandhan University Institute of Medical Sciences and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India

Abstract

It has been shown that external pancreatic ductal stenting (EPDS) can reduce the incidence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula. Although studies have described EPDS in open pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), EPDS in minimally invasive PD has not been reported yet. Thus, the objective of this study was to describe the technique of EPDS in minimally invasive PD. The procedure was performed either laparoscopically or using a robot. Once PD was completed, key steps included triple enterotomy, threading of silk-suture through all enterotomies and exteriorization, completing posterior layer of pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ), railroading stent through preplaced silk-suture, intubation of stent into the pancreatic duct, completion of PJ, followed by hepaticojejunostomy and parietalization of jejunum at the stent exit site. EPDS in PD through a minimally invasive approach can be performed safely in selected cases with either a small-sized pancreatic duct or a soft pancreas.

Keyword

Pancreatoduodenctomy; Pancreatic duct; Stenting; Minimal invasive; Pancreatic fistula

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Port positions. (A) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy, (B) Robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy. R1–4, robotic port 1 to 4; A1, 2, assistant port 1, 2.

  • Fig. 2 (A) Triple enterotomy. (B) Threading of suture through hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) and pancreatojejunostomy, (C) Threading of suture through parietalization site and HJ site.

  • Fig. 3 (A) Completion of posterior layer of pancreaticojejunostomy. (B) Completion of posterior duct to mucosa suture layer. (C) Final appearance after external pancreatic ductal stenting.

  • Fig. 4 Lateral view of a patient with external pancreatic ductal stent in situ, showing pancreatic juice within the tubing and bag.


Reference

1. Sharpe SM, Talamonti MS, Wang CE, Prinz RA, Roggin KK, Bentrem DJ, et al. 2015; Early national experience with laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma: a comparison of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy from the national cancer data base. J Am Coll Surg. 221:175–184. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.04.021. PMID: 26095569.
Article
2. Pedrazzoli S. 2017; Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF): a systematic review and analysis of the POPF-related mortality rate in 60,739 patients retrieved from the English literature published between 1990 and 2015. Medicine (Baltimore). 96:e6858. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006858. PMID: 28489778. PMCID: PMC5428612.
3. Crippa S, Salvia R, Falconi M, Butturini G, Landoni L, Bassi C. 2007; Anastomotic leakage in pancreatic surgery. HPB (Oxford). 9:8–15. DOI: 10.1080/13651820600641357. PMID: 18333107. PMCID: PMC2020778.
Article
4. Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, et al. 2017; The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery. 161:584–591. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014. PMID: 28040257.
Article
5. Nahm CB, Connor SJ, Samra JS, Mittal A. 2018; Postoperative pancreatic fistula: a review of traditional and emerging concepts. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 11:105–118. DOI: 10.2147/CEG.S120217. PMID: 29588609. PMCID: PMC5858541.
Article
6. Chen K, Pan Y, Liu XL, Jiang GY, Wu D, Maher H, et al. 2017; Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery. BMC Gastroenterol. 17:120. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-017-0691-9. PMID: 29169337. PMCID: PMC5701376.
Article
7. Hirono S, Kawai M, Okada KI, Miyazawa M, Kitahata Y, Hayami S, et al. 2019; Modified blumgart mattress suture versus conventional interrupted suture in pancreaticojejunostomy during pancreaticoduodenectomy: randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 269:243–251. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002802. PMID: 29697455. PMCID: PMC6325750.
Article
8. Kantor O, Pitt HA, Talamonti MS, Roggin KK, Bentrem DJ, Prinz RA, et al. 2018; Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: is the incidence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula comparable to that after open pancreatoduodenectomy? Surgery. 163:587–593. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.12.001. PMID: 29454444.
Article
9. Olakowski M, Grudzińska E, Mrowiec S. 2020; Pancreaticojejunostomy-a review of modern techniques. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 405:13–22. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01855-6. PMID: 31975148. PMCID: PMC7036071.
Article
10. Hu BY, Wan T, Zhang WZ, Dong JH. 2016; Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula: analysis of 539 successive cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 22:7797–7805. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i34.7797. PMID: 27678363. PMCID: PMC5016380.
Article
11. Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS, Chaikof EL, Vollmer CM Jr. 2013; A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 216:1–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.09.002. PMID: 23122535.
Article
12. McAuliffe JC, Parks K, Kumar P, McNeal SF, Morgan DE, Christein JD. 2013; Computed tomography attenuation and patient characteristics as predictors of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford). 15:709–715. DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12037. PMID: 23458275. PMCID: PMC3948539.
Article
13. Tranchart H, Gaujoux S, Rebours V, Vullierme MP, Dokmak S, Levy P, et al. 2012; Preoperative CT scan helps to predict the occurrence of severe pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 256:139–145. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318256c32c. PMID: 22609844.
Article
14. Yardimci S, Kara YB, Tuney D, Attaallah W, Ugurlu MU, Dulundu E, et al. 2015; A simple method to evaluate whether pancreas texture can be used to predict pancreatic fistula risk after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 19:1625–1631. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-015-2855-7. PMID: 25982120.
Article
15. Kawaida H, Kono H, Hosomura N, Amemiya H, Itakura J, Fujii H, et al. 2019; Surgical techniques and postoperative management to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery. World J Gastroenterol. 25:3722–3737. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i28.3722. PMID: 31391768. PMCID: PMC6676555.
Article
16. Markar SR, Vyas S, Karthikesalingam A, Imber C, Malago M. 2012; The impact of pancreatic duct drainage following pancreaticojejunostomy on clinical outcome. J Gastrointest Surg. 16:1610–1617. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-012-1852-3. PMID: 22383216.
Article
17. Patel K, Teta A, Sukharamwala P, Thoens J, Szuchmacher M, DeVito P. 2014; External pancreatic duct stent reduces pancreatic fistula: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Int J Surg. 12:827–832. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.06.008. PMID: 25003575.
Article
18. Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, Ng KK, Yuen WK, Yeung C, et al. 2007; External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent to reduce leakage rate of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 246:425–433. discussion 433–435. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181492c28. PMID: 17717446. PMCID: PMC1959348.
19. Dong Z, Xu J, Wang Z, Petrov MS. 2016; Stents for the prevention of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016:CD008914. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008914.pub3.
20. Helaly M, iwi D Sr, Alkholaidi WS, Almamlouk R, Elshaer A, Allaboon RM, et al. 2019; Retrograde pancreatic duct stent migration into the biliary tract presenting as a rare early complication of pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple procedure). Am J Case Rep. 20:1864–1868. DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.917297. PMID: 31831724. PMCID: PMC6930705.
Article
21. Jang JY, Chang YR, Kim SW, Choi SH, Park SJ, Lee SE, et al. 2016; Randomized multicentre trial comparing external and internal pancreatic stenting during pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 103:668–675. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10160. PMID: 27040594.
Article
22. Shin YC, Jang JY, Chang YR, Jung W, Kwon W, Kim H, et al. 2019; Comparison of long-term clinical outcomes of external and internal pancreatic stents in pancreaticoduodenectomy: randomized controlled study. HPB (Oxford). 21:51–59. DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.06.1795. PMID: 30093143.
Article
23. Boggi U, Amorese G, Vistoli F, Caniglia F, De Lio N, Perrone V, et al. 2015; Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic literature review. Surg Endosc. 29:9–23. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3670-z. PMID: 25125092.
Article
24. Justo Alonso I, Marcacuzco Quinto A, Caso Maestro O, Jiménez-Romero C. 2018; Anastomotic reconstruction and external drainage of Wirsung's duct as treatment for pancreaticojejunal stenosis following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 96:648–652. DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2018.08.003. PMID: 30448151.
Article
Full Text Links
  • AHBPS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr